Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 May 17

< May 16	May 18 >

May 17

File:PowerSchool (logo).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:32, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused logo, no obvious encyclopedic use FASTILY 00:34, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
weak delete It could have been used on the PowerSchool page that was deleted last year. Logos being out of scope for commons is ridiculous, but irrelevant for keeping it here, so it may as well be deleted here. If it is needed again it can be undeleted without prejudice. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:21, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: relisted on 2019 May 29. MBisanz ^talk 02:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:RCA Bluebird 78 B-11230-B Glenn Miller.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ABRA-logo-FINAL-RBGF.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:33, 24 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:Logo of Alcoholic Beverage Regulation Administration.png. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:06, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Attorney General Ravnsborg discussing the TRACED Act with Senator John Thune.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Poster was not, as he claimed, copyright holder and did not have sufficient permission to enter into license, per this talk page post. Nat Gertler (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - the uploader is obviously not the copyright holder as claimed in the licensing. The permission of the actual copyright holder is does not provide a free license. The uploader has been advised of the procedure for requesting permission. No issue with uploading the image again when proper licensing has been established. -- Whpq (talk) 17:02, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hypothetical typhoon rolando.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:33, 18 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This is obviously not own work, unless the user owned the satellite, but this is quite impossible B dash (talk) 09:34, 10 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, essentially orphaned (not used in the main space) with questionable licensing. Salavat (talk) 04:52, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Invalid^OS (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Salavat. Invalid^OS (talk) 16:59, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.