Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 March 22

< March 21	March 23 >

March 22

File:Simmons_University_Seal.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:06, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I am requesting that this image be removed from Wikipedia. I originally posted the seal as part of our institution's renaming from college to University. I posted it using the wrong license and was asked to have it take it down. I removed it from the Simmons University page but they would also like the seal deleted completely for now. I hope I did this right! -- Mikecorreia (talk) 20:37, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Watson Rutherford.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Since we know both the photographer and the publication dates, this image is unquestionably safe on Commons as c:File:Watson Rutherford.jpg. Unless OP has an additional objection to render, we can delete the local version. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 22:05, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please give a publication date. Threehundredeight (talk) 05:18, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:41, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete doesn't include a publication date, so it's not possible to conclude whether this is PD in the US or not. (Additionally, nothing to conclude {{PD-US-unpublished}} by) – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 01:16, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Threehundredeight: It was undoubtedly published soon after it was taken. Photographs in those days were expensive, and I imagine a parliamentary figure would have had his commissioned photograph published. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:16, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

One thing we do know is that this was not a commissioned photograph. There is a higher bar for images legitimately existing on Commons which include dated evidence of publication.Threehundredeight (talk) 17:26, 24 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HRH The Duke of Edinburgh.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:15, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a painting used in the article about the artists. It's not the subject of significant sourced commentary and its removal would not be detrimental to the understanding of the article about the artists. Fails WP:NFCC#8 Whpq (talk) 12:13, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Retro Livery2.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 16:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Credit is given to an Instagram account. No evidence of permission, and the Instagram user does not typically tag their photos with CC-BY-SA. Jc86035 (talk) 16:42, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LACMTA Metro Gold Line at South Pasadena1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I originally nominated this for CSD. However, the article from which the image appears to be sourced claims the image is used under CC BY 2.0; but the image does not appear to be available on Flickr anymore, so the claim is difficult to verify. Jc86035 (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@RHaworth: I removed the CSD tag before you deleted the file, so it could be appropriate to temporarily undelete it. Jc86035 (talk) 17:00, 22 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.