Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 June 2

< June 1	June 3 >

June 2

File:BuffaloNYSeal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

unused, doesn't represent the official seal, dubious self-work claim FASTILY 05:49, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned with no obvious value. Salavat (talk) 03:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Neither this image nor the present image being used are representations of the present Buffalo seal (see https://www.buffalony.gov/1244/Branding-and-Design-Resources). @Fastily: This image is a colorized photo of the city seal engraved in the facade of Buffalo city hall, taken by myself, colorized by myself, so please stifle your "dubious self-work claim". PAR (talk) 07:34, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Two versions of the seal in the file history make me dubious - the movement of the word "Of" being the most obvious difference. It's been orphaned since 2011, and is unlikely to be used in the future in any of the interesting color schemes presented. ★ Bigr Tex 22:13, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Gruber.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

on Commons with a superior resolution and format: File:John Gruber 2008 by George Del Barrio.tif. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:31, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to Commons file. Salavat (talk) 03:41, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, redundant.--Vulp here 05:22, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Barry J. Gillis at the Calgary International Film Festival in 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:04, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Taken from here, where it is hosted as "Public domain" with no indication of how or why it became PD, or of how the photographer relinquished his/her rights. Obviously not a selfie as the uploader appears to be trying to claim. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:39, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Obviously not a selfie, as the subject's hands are both visible, and obviously not holding a phone, in the larger version that this was cropped from — and since "red carpet at film festival" photos like this are not normally public domain, we would need to see stronger evidence that the real photographer actually released his or her copyright. Just like here, IMDb is also vulnerable to the uploading of non-PD photos under false claims of PD, so the fact that its copyright information on IMDb says it's public domain is not satisfactory proof in and of itself that it really is. Bearcat (talk) 16:15, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Close up of the tombstone of Reverend Joseph Paget.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No evidence of permission — JJMC89 (T·C) 00:06, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No OTRS ticket, statement on the Facebook page doesn't look like a clear release to me after being run through Google Translate AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:48, 2 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.