Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2019 August 13

< August 12	August 14 >

August 13

File:Meisterstadt 5-2019.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. No license has been provided for the photo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:33, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A license has not been provided for the photograph itself, only the pictured work. A free image could be taken of the development, so WP:NFCC#1 is not satisfied. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:45, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have read the image policy, but I pretty confused with it too because in one of its rules, it stated that work of architecture has copyright and this image I've got is from website. Therefore, I belived this is a non-free content. So, I put it as fair use image. I also put the source on it. If someone have any thoughts in this, any help would be appreciated. Thank you. Samuelsp15 (talk) 10:31, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
US FoP applies to photographs of buildings, so the photographer holds exclusive copyright under US law. {{FoP-USonly}} applies since buildings are copyright in Indonesia (c:COM:FOP Indonesia). For the photograph to be free, the copyright holder (photographer) must explicitly release it under a free license. There is no evidence that this has been done. Since anyone could photograph the development and freely license it, it is replaceable with a free work. — JJMC89 (T·C) 01:52, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I see. After I checked it again (with your suggestion), this image does not provide any sufficient details. So, I need to photograph and freely licensed it, which means that I have to upload a new version of the file. But, because this file is about the development in May 2019, what about if I take the photo from the official website (account)? Thank you. Samuelsp15 (talk) 12:28, 15 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I doubt that photo would be freely licensed. — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:57, 16 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: After checking all related websites, I pretty sure that this man (here, in https://web.archive.org/web/20190814104828/https://www.skyscrapercity.com/showthread.php?t=1855091&page=14&amp=1) photographed the development. Samuelsp15 (talk) 10:59, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Carnegie Hall Christmas Concert CD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#8. The cover is not used as the primary means of visual identification, contrary to the rationale. Use in A Carnegie Hall Christmas Concert does not satisfy WP:NFCI#1 since the article subject is the film, not the album. — JJMC89 (T·C) 06:08, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. While there might occasionally be circumstances when a supplementary nonfree image might be displayed in an article on an event, here the supplementary image is just a minor variation on the primary identifying image and therefore violates the minimum use principle. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo). Treated like dirt by many administrators since 2006. (talk) 17:07, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ICC World Twenty20 Trophy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:45, 20 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

NFCC not met: (#1) image is clearly replaceable, as this is a current trophy that tours around grounds. (#8) Article is not centred around the trophy, and does not discuss it in depth; instead being about the tournament at which the trophy is awarded. Harrias ^talk 09:12, 13 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.