Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 October 17

< October 16	October 18 >

October 17

File:Rainierlogoforinfobox.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Qualifies for {{PD-textlogo}} Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:04, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then just retag the file, but is it the correct logo? Following the link to the company's website in the infobox, I find a logo which contains the company's full name (Rainier Beer), not just a single letter. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's no set "bar" for threshold of originality. Putting the files to a discussion gives us a chance to obtain consensus and I'm much more comfortable doing that than making potentially controversial changes without consensus.
With respect to which logo to use, I'd prefer the one used on the website. If this image is PD, that file would be as well. Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:14, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Support the change to pd-logo and transfer to Commons. Is there a chance that the "R" was used just to represent the Rainier Brewing Company (now defunct) and the full logo for the beer itself? The website is now only for the beer so a bit hard to tell. Salavat (talk) 04:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Non-free logos in Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics. ℯ xplicit 00:43, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Similiar to Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 October 8#Non-free logos in Bids for the 2020 Summer Olympics, The non-free use of these logos in Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics is decortive and seems unnecessary per WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#3 and WP:NFCC#8 because of WP:NFTABLES, item 6 of WP:NFC#UUI, WP:NFLISTS and MOS:LOGO. Each of these files is used as the primary means of identification in stand-alone articles about the bids themselves and those particular non-free uses seem fine.

Suggest keep for their respective stand-alone articles and remove from "Bids for the 2016 Summer Olympics". -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:16, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:J.Lo - Me Haces Falta.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seemingly random picture. Not discussed critically. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 12:23, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:"Endymion Wilkinson at First Emperor's Palace, Xianyang, Shaanxi, China.jpg".jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a photo of a developed photograph placed on some carpeting and would be a derivative work of the original photograph. Whpq (talk) 13:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned file with no obvious value. Also questionable licensing status. Salavat (talk) 04:09, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matlab surf sinc.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image generated using a copyrighted software Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:53, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file seems to be below the threshold of originality. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:51, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:01, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, the software used to generate an image does not create a copyright on the image. Photographs taken with a Canon camera are not Canon's copyright, and documents written using Word are not Microsoft's copyright. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:52, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Elfyn Llwyd.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incorrectly licensed. The file is a crop from this flickr image which is licensed with CC BY-NC-SA 2.0. This license does not permit commercial use, and is unacceptable here. Verbcatcher (talk) 20:27, 17 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.