Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 October 14
October 14
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- File:Democratic Socialists of America.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Vanished 1850 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Deprecated: replaced by a higher-quality (in terms of color and fogging) image in article. Artoria2e5 contrib 05:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete since better picture already exists. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:08, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
- File:Redmi Note 4x Hatsune Miku.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bololabich (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
WP:NFCC#1 Can be replaced by free media. Using the picture on official website is not the only way. Someone who bought this phone can take a picture then upload it to Wikicommons. dqwyy (talk) from zhWiki 11:42, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NFCC#1. Free media should always be preferred. -- Magioladitis (talk) 23:09, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy delete. F9 - uploader admits to license laundering Primefac (talk) 16:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- File:Melissa Roxburgh.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Icem4k (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Pretty confident this is license laundering. It was found on a random blog and the photo itself is all over the Internet and has been for quite some time before the blog post was created. Majora (talk) 15:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- Well I did my research and I found one with the CC BY-SA 4.0 License. So you saying I did a bad thing like really yes image is all over the internet but if you are to do a background on every photo you find on wikipidea that is under the CC BY-SA 4.0 License trust me you will find most of them questionable. So my question as am learning how to use wikipidea dose the source also have to be questioned as to how it obtained that particular image. Am confused. Chabota Kanguya (talk) 16:26, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- So...let me see if I have this right. Judging by your signature, you took an image you found on the Internet, uploaded it to your personal blog, slapped a CC license on it, and then used your own blog as a source. Yeah, no. That isn't going to fly here. You cannot take images you find on the Internet and just use them however you want. That is copyright infringement. Where did you find the original image? Did you take the image yourself? I doubt it. Now I am certain that this is license laundering as you pretty much admitted it.
Oh, and if you find any other "questionable" images on Wikipedia you let me know and I'll take care of them. Thanks. --Majora (talk) 16:44, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
- So...let me see if I have this right. Judging by your signature, you took an image you found on the Internet, uploaded it to your personal blog, slapped a CC license on it, and then used your own blog as a source. Yeah, no. That isn't going to fly here. You cannot take images you find on the Internet and just use them however you want. That is copyright infringement. Where did you find the original image? Did you take the image yourself? I doubt it. Now I am certain that this is license laundering as you pretty much admitted it.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.