Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 3

< November 2	November 4 >

November 3

File:Khurshid.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-right violation. It is stated that the image is sourced from [1] which clearly does not release this image under any license. Adamgerber80 (talk) 05:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete as an unambiguous copyvio. Also fails NFCC#1: subject is a living person and a free image could be created. Neil S. Walker (talk) 20:08, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bashir Sogami's Potrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader claims own work in edit summary but dubious, low resolution with no EXIF data. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned file with no obvious use and unclear copyright status. Salavat (talk) 02:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Salavat; orphaned non-free file. Neil S. Walker (talk) 20:11, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ghulam Nabi Wani Sogami's Potrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 07:39, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Author claims own work in edit summary but appears to be a scan. – Train2104 (t • c) 13:20, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned file with no obvious use and unclear copyright status. Salavat (talk) 02:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete ambiguous copyright status; suggestive of a photograph of a printed source. Neil S. Walker (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No valid source information to verify the license. Moreover, as Salavat said, the file is not used on any of the article. So fails to meet the non-free usage criteria. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 13:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tiger Tank Diagram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I nominate these images for deletion as I don't think the edits are enough constitute fair use. The images are claimed as Own work in the license. But they appear to be modified versions of screenshots from the video game "War Thunder". In the game you are able to view a tank's internal layout using an "X-Ray" mode while previewing it. For comparison purposes I started the game and took screenshots of the same vehicles in X-Ray mode: Tiger I (Tiger H1 in-game) : https://i.imgur.com/NOgpQGm.jpg ; Panther A: https://i.imgur.com/fUTzfHy.jpg ; Marder III (Marder III H in-game; image taken from the opposite side, as the gunner is leaning on the gun.) : https://i.imgur.com/eAVIOgC.jpg AcadamaeDood (talk) 19:35, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

delete as copyvios. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe logos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. ℯ xplicit 00:22, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seven non-free files and two questionably licensed free images being used in Ministerial Conference on the Protection of Forests in Europe. All of the files were uploaded by the same editor, an WP:SPA whose only edits were made to this particular article and has not edited since 2015. The files licensed as non-free content, except for possibly "File:Forest Europe Logo.jpg" being used as the primary means of identification at the top of the article, clearly fail WP:NFCC#8 and WP:NFLISTS since they are basically being used in non-notable individual entries of an embedded list. These would probably be OK as the primary means of identification in stand-alone articles about the individual conferences if such existed, but not as they are currenty being used. The two files ("File:Extraordinary Ministerial Conference 2015.png" and "File:Madrid Ministerial Conference 2015.png: Revision history") licensed as {{self}} seem to have been done so in error, and they probably should have been uploaded as non-free content instead like the rest. However, converting their licenses to non-free seems pointless becauce they would have the same NFCCP issues as the other aforementioned logos.

Suggest delete for all of these logos, with the possible exception of "File:Forest Europe Logo.jpg" being used for primary identification. However, this logo appears to be the one technically used by the organization Forest Europe, and FOREST EUROPE redirects to the conference article. If the consensus on this file's non-free use is that the conference article and Forest Europe are one and the same, then the file can be kept and its rationale revised accordingly. If the consensus is that they are not the same, the file should be deleted, unless a stand-alone article is created for the organization and the logo is used there. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.