Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 19

< November 18	November 20 >

November 19

File:Cabinet Würzig (Full flavour).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per c:COM:PACKAGING this is a derivative work of a likely copyrighted package. Which means it definitely isn't public domain. Majora (talk) 03:37, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Classics Live - The Logical Song (Single) by Roger Hodgson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There is no official artwork for this song.The uploaded graphic image was created by a fan. The song was not released as a single, anyway. Binksternet (talk) 08:08, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file was uploaded after a dispute over an attempt to use the album cover as a fair use cover for the single (though there is nothing to indicate it was a single). The upload claims the image is from the label's website, but I haven't been able to find it there. The extended info for the image says it was created the day it was uploaded, using Photoshop. It appears to be the album cover image with the song title added. It seems likely that it was created by the uploader in an act of an overly zealous fan. They hadn't commented on this xfd prior to being blocked for sock puppetry for a week. I rather expect the file (a copyright violation, I assume) will be gone by the time they are able to return. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:13, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goth Felicity Smoak (Arrow).jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 27#File:Goth Felicity Smoak (Arrow).jpeg. ℯ xplicit 00:23, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A picture of her as "goth" doesn't seem to be fair use to me when another picture of her is in the article. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 17:28, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I added the image as I felt it added context to the understanding of the character (as per NFCC criterion 8), and changes to both her outward appearance and lifestyle choices over a period of time. Daff22 (talk) 10:31, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.