Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 November 12

< November 11	November 13 >

November 12

File:CaseoftheVelvetClaws1953paperback.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free book cover. There is no article on the book in question, and this file is not used on any article currently. Softlavender (talk) 10:35, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Softlavender:, unused non-free files should be tagged with {{subst:orfud}} (orphaned non-free images) instead of being listed here at FFD. Orhaned non-free files will then be deleted within seven days. Salavat (talk) 00:20, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, Salavat, I kind of realized something like that after I filed this. What should happen now? This FFD can be closed/removed, etc., if that's appropriate. Softlavender (talk) 00:23, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Could possible be closed, not sure how the admin usually deal with this kind of thing. Salavat (talk) 00:25, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nasir Sogami MoS Home as Chief guest at CTC lethpora.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution, no EXIF, author has history of copyvios – Train2104 (t • c) 15:51, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, orphaned file with potential copyright issues. Salavat (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vijay-puli.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image is a promotional poster for the movie Puli (2015 film). The image comes from Bollywood Hungama which has an OTRS ticket releasing photos taken by their photographers under a free license, but this does not extend to movie posters and other material. This does not appear to be something that would be covered under the ticket 2008030310010794 Whpq (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vijay-rowdyrathore.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image is from Bollywood Hungama, and although some photos from the site have been released under a free license through OTRS ticket 2008030310010794, this does not appear to qualify. This does not look to be a photo of a Bollywood party or event photographed by a Bollywood Hungama photographer. Whpq (talk) 18:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.