Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 January 23

< January 22	January 24 >

January 23

File:1979 Los Angele 9101338 0 0.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file's tags contradict each other. It is simultaneously tagged as {{cc-by-3.0}}, which is obviously incorrect given that it was taken from the NFL/Getty Images, and with a fair use rationale. As for its fair use claim, there is no critical commentary supported by this image. It is simply providing a visual for the 1979 Rams team. Fails WP:NFCC#8. Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 00:42, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If there is another tag that goes better with the image, I will add it, if not, I will not object to its deletion.--MarcusPearl95 (talk) 03:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence that the cc-by-3.0 tag applies. Fails WP:NFCC#2 if it doesn't apply. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:11, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stan Kroenke Rams 2012.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The tags on this file's description page appear to contradict each other. It is tagged as {{cc-by-3.0}}, but this would be obviously incorrect since it was taken from USA Today and CBS Sports, which would make it a non-free image. If it is non-free, it would then qualify under WP:CSD#F7 because it is a commercial source where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary, and it is a picture of a person still alive (see Wikipedia:Non-free content#Unacceptable use). Zzyzx11 (talk) 09:49, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No evidence that the cc-by-3.0 tag is correct. If it isn't correct, then the picture fails WP:NFCC#1 because there is no evidence that the depicted person is dead. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:12, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:7KhoonMaaf albumcover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 12:45, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:North Texas Solid Green Diving Eagle Left.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep in North Texas Mean Green, remove all other instances. — ξ ^xplicit 05:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This seems to fail WP:NFC#UUI §17 in North Texas Mean Green football and North Texas Mean Green men's basketball, and also WP:NFCC#9 in Draft:North Texas-UTSA Rivalry. Stefan2 (talk) 17:57, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coldplay - Princess Of China Screenshot.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 completely. —Indian:BIO ^{[ ChitChat ]} 19:13, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TAPAD png lg green.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 05:35, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't find any evidence that the company actually uses this logo. The company's website contains a similar logo but with different colours: http://www.tapad.com/wp-content/themes/tapad/images/logo-home-large.png Stefan2 (talk) 21:20, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence here. They have three versions of the logo. David King, Ethical Wiki (CorporateM) (Talk) 23:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Many logos have poor sources, and there have been a few occasions recently where I've come across a logo on Wikipedia which is different from the one on the company's website. Do you think that this is the preferred logo colour, or should we use one of the other ones? --Stefan2 (talk) 23:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.