Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 1

< July 31	August 2 >

August 1

File:Goalkeeper Artan Latifi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is tagged as a non-free screenshot of software! Wrong tag, yes, but what is the appropriate license tag for it? I have difficulty determining its copyright status even though there is a source for it. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:01, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Without a free license, this image is non-free. Fair use cannot be claimed for photos of living, public figures. Vanjagenije (talk) 13:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Orthodox Theological Seminary, Kottayam.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. The file has got renamed since the nomination. Codename Lisa (talk) 11:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image with dubious encyclopedic value. Possibly, Wikipedia is being used as a hosting service here. Codename Lisa (talk) 09:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Move to Commons - This image was previously used in the Malankara Orthodox Syrian Church (see this version). The caption identifies this as "Orthodox Theological Seminary, Kottayam". --Whpq (talk) 02:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Michael Ford's Photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A Twitter photo is not automatically PD. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - totally bogus public domain reasoning. --Whpq (talk) 02:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Book Of Pooh Title Card.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Convert to fair use Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Title card from a third party work, so I fail to see how it's self. In-use so could be converted to 'non-free' use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:INS Arihant during sea trials.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:02, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1, WP:NFCC#2, WP:NFCC#10c Wcam (talk) 12:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Go Delete first. This image can get by oneself.--Shwangtianyuan Talk Here 04:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nagpur Montage.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image montage created from various web photos. Uploader has explicitly stated in the comments "I do not hold any copyright of this picture" which contradicts the licensing chosen. No source provided for the source images so there is no way to verify licenses of the components. This derivative work is likely a copyright violation. Whpq (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:7IN D&BC 1950.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist czar 18:24, 31 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 31#File:7IN_D&BC_1950.jpg

Referal to FFD, because the sourcing is somewhat vauge, and in an informal IRC discussion, there was some comments that certain things didn't look right in the image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hold, - Another contributor says they will look into the quality issues with this image.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:36, 7 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SEPTAboot2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Image fails WP:NFC#8. Uploaded by a banned user, and currently only serves decorative purposes in the article. Its inclusion is not needed to futher understand the subject matter, and only futher perpetuates the banned user's non-neutral POV on the subject. –Dream out loud (talk) 17:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:800px-Downtown Sancroppped.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete: unused crop, transfer original to Commons czar 18:28, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cropped version of image, Original filename mangled so where DID this one come from? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Sfan00 IMG:, Image:Downtown San.jpg which is currently licensed as {{PD-self}}. Note:I went back and found the edit where the uploader of the image in question changed out this image for the cropped version. ~~BTW, Keep.~~ ★ Bigr Tex 21:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Soumya-Sarkar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by BigrTex (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It appears that this file may not be Own Work, and thus can not be licensed under the GFDL. There are a few similar images found by Google Image Search, including one page that credits the photo to the Hindustan Times AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 20:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Handley Page Hermes.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: seven days to add a fair use rationale, though I doubt it based on the image context czar 19:07, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Promotional image from corporate sales brouchure, I fail to see how this is GFDL. At best it might be PD-UK, but that seems unlikely. Willing to consider 'non-free' use as this image is in use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Church-orig-full.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Relist czar 19:10, 31 August 2016 (UTC) [reply]

Relisted at Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 August 31#File:Church-orig-full.png

Uploader claims "I (Steven Kyle Adair) created this work entirely by myself." but image is from 1945 and sepia tone and imperfections make it look like a scan of an image from a newspaper from that time. See also Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 July 21#File:Emma-orig.png for another image from the same uploader with similar issues. ★ Bigr Tex 21:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is of the ownership of Glendale UMC in Nashville, TN and scanned from our history book - not a newspaper - that is owned by Glendale UMC. As a member and communications coordinator for Glendale UMC, we own this photo. ska8706 21:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you confirm this to the OTRS queue? - see WP:COPYREQ Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:11, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A toute a lheure1961-67.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a work by an artist who died in 1979 ( European copyright terms are typically life+70 years). Unused so 'non-free' use not directly possible. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.