Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2016 April 19

< April 18	April 20 >

April 19

File:Adi Shakti, the Supreme Spirit without attributes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 14:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Paintbrush derivative of another work. —SpacemanSpiff 04:24, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jaggy MacB.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 14:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content (mascot) FASTILY 09:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seabiscuit memorial, Saratoga Springs NY.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 14:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Possible derivative of non-free content (statue); there is no FOP for 3D works in the US FASTILY 10:02, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Screenshot of IBM AIX SMIT Change or Show Characteristics of a User Screen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is of copyrighted software to illustrate the article System Management Interface Tool. However, another image of this software has already been uploaded. See File:Screenshot_of_IBM_AIX_SMIT_Initial_Menu.png . . . as this is copyrighted software, it seems that only one image of its kind should be necessary, unless this image conveys something of value that the other does not. H.dryad (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this image should be retained because it shows an insight in to how the tool actually works which is important to its discussion. The initial menu image File:Screenshot_of_IBM_AIX_SMIT_Initial_Menu.png lists what areas the tool manages but does not give a hint of the actual workings. File:Screenshot of IBM AIX SMIT Change or Show Characteristics of a User Screen.png shows how the user accomplishes tasks. Therefore I believe that the two images do convey different information and both should be kept. Gareth.randall (talk) 22:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: If that were the case, Gareth.randall, one would expect to (and WP:NFC requires) actual sourced critical discussion of this feature with reference to the image be found in the article. Currently, there is nothing beyond the simple cation "The 'Edit User' menu screen." – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:27, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Storm-jet-rid.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Photograph of a copyrighted toy. See Commons:COM:TOY. Josh Milburn (talk) 14:44, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The link is wrong, I think you mean Commons:COM:TOYS which might be we no one has responded? I'm no expert, but from what I understand we have to consider the copyright of the photographer and the copyright of the toy and/or character. Anyway, I vote to keep because the photo is the work of the uploader with a CC licence and if you look at the Jetstorm page where the picture is displayed, you can see other versions of the Jetstorm character uploaded with a copyright tag and a fair use rationale. We just need to add that tag to this picture and make sure it is only on Wikipedia not Commons. Visual representations of the toys convey the differences between the characters, e.g. this one is a plane but an earlier one was a 4WD. Mkultraviolence (talk) 01:34, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:14, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May or may not survive with a non-free rationale. Those users who wish to retain the photo (@Mkultraviolence and Curis:) should add them as appropriate. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:24, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, derivative work of copyrighted item. Adding a fair use rationale would still be likely to fail because of WP:NFCC#3a. Stifle (talk) 10:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Iphone 6 screen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iphone 6 screen.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Derivative work of copyright-protected software. I do not believe that this would fall under an de-minimis exception. "

Where's the "copyright-protected software" in this image? Most of these icons are trivially generic. Safari is freely licensed by Apple and full versions of its icon are already on Commons. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:05, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ipad air 2 thin as pencil.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 28 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Iphone 6 screen.png Magog the Ogre (t • c) 05:03, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Derivative work of copyright-protected software. I do not believe that this would fall under an de-minimis exception. "

Where's the "software" in this image? Those icons are so edge-on that they're beyond de minimis and into unintelligible. Andy Dingley (talk) 10:02, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:23, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Software elements are de minimis in this photo. – Finnusertop (talk ⋅ contribs) 22:21, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, software elements depicted, could be retaken with the screen switched off/displaying a free photo/etc. Stifle (talk) 10:07, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AMAA Statuette.jpg

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2016 April 27.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete--Ymblanter (talk) 14:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source of image is not clear. Going by the source provided Jamie Tubers, who uploaded this file claims that it is his Own Work, but the source also says that file is Owned by Africa Film Academy. In this discussion here . Tubers turns around and says that Africa Film Academy owns the copyright and not him. Stanleytux (talk) 23:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.