Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2015 November 9

< November 8	November 10 >

November 9

File:Ed Sheeran Photograph.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Converted album cover, Seemingly unsed, but can't be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:02, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ItsLuke: Why can't this be moved to Commons? It's just plain typography--it can't be copyrighted. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added this image back in 2014, updating where necessary to the newer format. For some reason, @Tomica: uploaded the exact same thing here and took mine off the article. I don't mind you deleting my copy but it's weird that someone felt the need to replace it with an identical image! --ItsLuke (contribs) 16:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it is the same image, but in a different format! PNG =/= JPG like what your image is. And although there is no a drastic difference in this case, a lot of images which are uploaded in jpg ruin the quality of the picture, which is not the same for pictures uploaded in png. So my advice is png over jpg.— Tom^(T2ME) 17:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This can't be moved to Commons because there is no evidence that the picture is free in the source country. Fairly simple typography is copyrightable in the United Kingdom, see e.g. c:COM:SIG#United Kingdom and File:EDGE magazine (logo).svg. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jozef Haller.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a cropped portion of a higher resolution image already at Commons - File:Józef Haller.PNG which has a clearer licensing/attribution. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ANG Seal.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unneeded JPEG version of File:Army National Guard logo.png. —innotata 02:44, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: per nom; a better versions is available on the commons. ww2censor (talk) 11:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CMFLOGO.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a textlogo, not necessarily own work as claimed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Compassionate Mind Foundation was deleted and is now a redirect. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chu Mimi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image is currently tagged as self, but the description read "fair use rationale", with no rationale actually being provided. This (given the low resoultion) makes me wonder if the licensing is wrong. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep because this is the only free photo available of her

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Linshaomin's graduation photo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, possibly a user profile image? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:30, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dejan M headshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Photo was not taken by uploader. Need evidence the photographer assigned permission properly. BethNaught (talk) 14:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:User-kylestag.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused , Possibly profile image. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:22, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Feeback response map.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, appears to be feedback for something, Education project related? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:26, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Response report by name.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, appears to tracking for some kind of project. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Response report.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, appears to feedback for some project Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Acholi authorities .jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, and without context maybe out of scope on Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Acholimzee of paromo and p .jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unsued, and with no context Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Daniels.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:FOP. The USA does not allow freedom of panorama... a sculptor owns all the images of the sculpture. In this case, the sculptor is Stephen H. Smith and the sculpture was made in 2003. For proof see http://www.dcmemorials.com/index_indiv0005381.htm, http://wrightstories.com/wright-brothers-sculpture/ and http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2003-12-13-wright-bros-sculpture_x.htm. Binksternet (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like a case for WP:PUF to me. I agree that the copyright status is an issue, though. The sculptor has a website with contact information in case someone wants to secure permission for this photography.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, I intended this discussion to take place at Possibly unfree files, along with a similar discussion about File:First flight sculpture.JPG, uploaded by the same editor. Binksternet (talk) 18:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:V gaurd milestone.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is unused, and although claimed as self, It may be promotional material from the named company. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:21, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:75th-logo-bhm.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is being used in Birmingham-Shuttlesworth International Airport#History. Image is not discussed at all and usage appears primarily decorative. I don't think the image is needed per WP:NFCC#8 for the reader to understand the sentence "In 2006 Birmingham International Airport celebrated its 75th year." - Marchjuly (talk) 07:33, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 19:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There is no sourced critical discussion about the logo, and the event for which the logo was created only takes up one sentence in the article. Fails WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:21April1967emblem.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is being used in Phoenix in popular culture and Georgios Papadopoulos. It has a non-free use rationale for each article but use does not seem to satisfy WP:NFCC#8 for either article. Use in "Phoenix in popular culture" also probably fails WP:NFCC#1 since there area a number of images at Commons which could be used to express the same idea. - Marchjuly (talk) 07:46, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 20:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NFCC#8 in both articles as it isn't critically discussed there. Seems to satisfy WP:NFCC#8 in Greek military junta of 1967–74 as it appears to be a symbol commonly associated with the military junta, but that article has a different copy of the symbol with much better quality, so let's delete this file. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Asociación del Fútbol Argentino (crest).svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: remove from all articles except Argentine Football Association. — ξ ^xplicit 05:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image is used in multiple articles had has a non-free rationale for each. The question is whether the logo of a national federation can be used or should be used in individual team articles. No. 17 of WP:UUI#NFC says that logos for parent entities should not be used in child entity articles, and that logo specific to the child entity should be used instead (ala WP:NFCR#File:USA Hockey.svg above). The national teams of many countries, however, do use the same logo for all age-levels of competition and both men and women's team. Most of the official pages linked to for these teams will all show the same logo being used, so I am wondering if there are any allowances to be made in such cases. I've removed some similar logos in the past per No. 17, so I would just like a little more clarification. I can re-add the logos if there use is actully considered acceptable. - Marchjuly (talk) 21:55, 1 July 2015

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 20:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The teams seem to be sub-entities of Argentine Football Association, which suggests that the picture shouldn't be used in those articles per WP:NFC#UUI §17. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: My opinion regarding the usage of this image hasn't really changed since I originally started the NFCR thread about it back in July. I have, however, added some general comments about No. 17 and its application to Wikipedia talk:Files for discussion/2015 November 9#No. 17 of WP:NFC#UUI. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paul Greenberg.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is at commons as File:PaulGreenbergAuthorofFourFish.jpg but there seems to be a licensing mismatch. Who actually took the photo? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

See also c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:PaulGreenbergAuthorofFourFish.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agha Nasir Ali.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image uploaded by blocked user. Also I am not sure it's self as claimed as this looks like an official photo found elsewhere. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Agha Shaukat Ali.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Upload by blocked user. Also I'm skeptical about a self claim as this looks like an older photo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to be a historical photo. The source information is probably wrong. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taftlogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: convert license to {{PD-logo}}. — ξ ^xplicit 05:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Is this image eligible for copyright protection in the US? George Ho (talk) 02:48, 2 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Discussion relisted from Wikipedia:Non-free content review.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Steel1943 (talk) 21:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Presumably not. United States logos from that era are almost always {{PD-US-no notice}} anyway. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Logo NT1-2012.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is a Logo that has been obseleted by ann SVG version. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The light effects make it look too complex for the copyright tag used. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eldillogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, which cannot be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:36, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't it just be added to ELDIL? --Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carlisle logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo, which cannot be moved to Commons. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Carlisle Wide Plank Floors was deleted, and there is no indication that the logo is notable. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mumtaz Khan.jpeg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, too low res to be of practical use. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paul Simon - Graceland (1986 CD).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Does not pass WP:NFUR, as it is virtually identical to the non-free standard cover and there is no critical commentary accompanying this variation. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 23:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.