Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2015 January 26
January 26
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Grounds.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Pratelios (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unidentified grounds. Low quality. Stefan2 (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. Looks like one of those dead-end files that, if kept, sits there doing nothing, just occupying space. Best regards, Codename Lisa (talk) 02:27, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 11:08, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
- File:Glee Season 6 Episode 4.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by SanAnMan (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8: not critically discussed. Stefan2 (talk) 16:51, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Disagree. As per rationale: "Header. The image is used for identification in the context of critical commentary of the work, product or service for which it serves as promotional photo. It makes a significant contribution to the user's understanding of the article, which could not practically be conveyed by words alone. The image is placed at the beginning of the article or section discussing the work,product or service; to help the user quickly identify the work and know they have found what they are looking for.Use for this purpose does not compete with the purposes of the original artwork, namely the creator providing graphic design services, and in turn the marketing of the promoted item.". See also files Glee Season 6 Episode 3.jpg.; Glee Season 6 Episode 2 Screenshot.jpg; and Glee season 6, promotional photo, jan 2015.jpg for other examples of this proof and usage. SanAnMan (talk) 17:05, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that you can't just add a rationale which says that the file provides understanding - the file also needs to provide that understanding. Also, removal would not be detrimental to the understanding of the article since the picture isn't critically discussed in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Per WP:NFCC#8: "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic (which this file does), and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" (which omission of this file would do). Your rationale would pretty much preclude the use of any and all screenshots from tv shows. And nowhere in that guidelines does it state that the screenshot itself has to be critically discussed, just that the article has to be critically discussed, which it is. Your one opinion seems to differ from pretty much all the other standard rules of screenshot usage on Wiki. SanAnMan (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Most screenshots from TV shows tend to be deleted when taken to FFD. See for example Wikipedia:Non-free content review/Archive 21#Star Trek: Voyager episode images where quite a lot of files were deleted. The fact that problems also exist elsewhere is irrelevant to this discussion, see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:38, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- Per WP:NFCC#8: "Contextual significance. Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the article topic (which this file does), and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding" (which omission of this file would do). Your rationale would pretty much preclude the use of any and all screenshots from tv shows. And nowhere in that guidelines does it state that the screenshot itself has to be critically discussed, just that the article has to be critically discussed, which it is. Your one opinion seems to differ from pretty much all the other standard rules of screenshot usage on Wiki. SanAnMan (talk) 17:25, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- The problem is that you can't just add a rationale which says that the file provides understanding - the file also needs to provide that understanding. Also, removal would not be detrimental to the understanding of the article since the picture isn't critically discussed in the article. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:15, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.