Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 September 20

< September 19	September 21 >

September 20

File:Flag of the Chief of the Defence Staff.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 17:16, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I tagged this as no license but was reverted, There is a claim of fair use, but no license for the file Werieth (talk) 04:32, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment how about slapping a {{non-free logo}} on it? -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:43, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a logo Werieth (talk) 09:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain that? Logo seems to cover flags. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:50, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Violates WP:NFCC#10b. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:00, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You could just add the license that 10b links to a list of. We have {{Non-free symbol}} and {{Non-free logo}} to choose from. -- 70.24.249.39 (talk) 05:54, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arrambam CD cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 17:18, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Stefan2 (talk) 12:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment why? It is the official album cover from amazon.com. And it is low resolution. Doesn't violate any policies. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 13:07, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
MOSFILM consensus is against having cover images in the album infoboxes in the film article Werieth (talk) 13:10, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That's a very weird rule. Why have the option then at all? Anyway, soundtrack has its own page now, that should solve the matter. Veera Dheera Sooran (talk) 15:01, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Now just remove the delete nomination. The image is fairly being used in Arrambam (soundtrack). ---- Kailash29792 (talk) 09:44, 1 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Care of Sir audio cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:02, 19 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8 and MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Stefan2 (talk) 14:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - See discussion on User talk:Stefan2#C/O Sir image. Sohambanerjee1998 13:06, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jozef Rohac Interpol.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:12, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is no proof anywhere that this is actually CC licensed as claimed. Interpol mugshots are also not PD-UN. Rosenzweig (talk) 20:38, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.