Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 May 16

< May 15	May 17 >

May 16

File:Mirza Mohammad Hassan Ahmadi Faqih.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates NFCC. See WP:NFC#UUI. See #10. The original source of this image cannot be determined and it is highly unlikely that the linked source is the original photographer. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 04:22, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dhanish with Ducks.JPEG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete per WP:CSD#G7 Harryboyles 12:48, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic value and I want it removed (I was the original uploader) Dhanish007 (talk) 06:32, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've tagged it under G7 for you and it will be deleted shortly. You can put {{db-g7}} when you are the sole author of a page and want it gone. Ramaksoud2000 ^{(Talk to me)} 12:36, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Indian high school.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged as non-free logo, but clearly not a logo. (ESkog)^(Talk) 15:23, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NSMBwii.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep – Quadell ^(talk) 13:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--non-free media used without a rationale for critical understanding. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 17:01, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - image needs a better fair use rationale, but there are several elements depicted here that cannot adequately be explained via prose. This needs cleanup, not deletion. WP:SOFIXIT applies here. --Teancum (talk) 13:12, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free content is used only if its presence would significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic, and its omission would be detrimental to that understanding. What about this cannot be adequately explained with prose? —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:20, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The art style, for starters. There's also the elements of cooperative gameplay, HUD elements and other gameplay features. This is not some frivolous image just to beef out the article. How does this not help readers better understand the article? I would also point out the licensing tag for the image "for identification and critical commentary on the computer or video game in question or the copyrighted character(s) or item(s) depicted on the screenshot in question". While there may or may not be much critical commentary on the characters depicted, a Mario game certainly would have the ability to do so considering the number of critical reviews. --Teancum (talk) 19:33, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Teancum. Diego (talk) 10:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chandigarh - Bus Tata Marcopolo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OB, replaced with File:Tata Marcopolo Green Chandigarh Ind.jpg which reduces file size significantly Polytope4d (talk) 18:09, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charter School Performance Study.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:21, 19 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

POV, Original Research, Not Supported By Citation Jadon (talk) 19:29, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Arctic council members.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

unused; factually incorrect. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 21:19, 16 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.