Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 March 16

< March 15	March 17 >

March 16

File:Mortgage data.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, screenshot of a spreadsheet showing a partial amortization schedule of someone's mortgage. In the event that we need an amortization schedule for a $1 million mortgage at 10% interest, we could do this with wiki markup. B (talk) 00:45, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New logo 4a.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo B (talk) 01:50, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New logo 4b.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo B (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pat O'Malley.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned self pic B (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Black Eagle 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, image has a copyright statement on it B (talk) 01:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Greater Syria Map.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deleted - it's on Commons and their deletion request has been closed without deleting it, so it serves no purpose to keep it here. Obviously, the map is not encyclopedic and attempts to use it beyond user space or in an intentionally confrontational manner are not permissible. Wikipedia is not a battleground. --B (talk) 13:12, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a map of the Middle East with a map of Syria draped over a large portion of it, including other people's countries. I cannot foresee any encyclopedic use for such an image. Dianna (talk) 02:31, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I Use it as a welcome and infobox in my user pageGhiathArodaki (talk) 05:27, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The map is revenge for another user on Arabic Wikipedia who produced a map of Africa with the flag of Egypt draped over a large part of it. I see no encyclopaedic use for this image and only further conflict if it is retained. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 09:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Who said it's a revenge? , If i would like to revenge , i would show the flag on egypt map , Man , what is the problem in this encyclopedia ? , every thing i upload here is revenge ?GhiathArodaki (talk) 10:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user has been in dispute with User:Faris knight over this image which the latter posted at Arabic Wikipedia. Ghiath objected to the idea of the flag of Egypt being spread out across its neighbours and it's my opinion that the image under discussion here is an attempt to do the same thing from his own national standpoint. Revenge may be too strong a term - getting his own back might be a better way of putting it. Unproductive, either way. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 10:51, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Again the dispute is not teh raeson why I Uploaded the file , The reason , I love my country and Before WWI This was the map of syria , but included the ares of syrian nationalist socialist , because i'm a syrian nationalistGhiathArodaki (talk) 16:18, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: serves nothing but battleground purposes. --Stfg (talk) 19:57, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no evidence of permission. The file clearly says that the uploader downloaded it from somewhere and added the flag. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 05:24, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. The use is obvious: to illustrate the irredentist claims over Greater Syria. Such flag-maps are common nationalist propaganda—one sees them all the time on posters, lapel pins, etc. There are probably dozens already on Wikipedia and/or Commons—see Commons:Category:Irredentism and Commons:Category:SVG maps incorporating flags - Irredentist. That said, the image can be deleted from Wikipedia as there's already an identical version on Commons at Commons:File:Greater Syria Map.png. —Psychonaut (talk) 08:15, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reportage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Reportage.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:User:Kiss_Regal#File:Reportage.jpg listed for deletion|User:Kiss_Regal]] ([{{fullurl:User talk:User:Kiss_Regal|action=edit&preload=Template:Fdw_preload&editintro=Template:Fdw_editintro&section=new&create=Post+a+comment}} notify] | [[Special:Contributions/User:Kiss_Regal|contribs]] | [[Special:ListFiles/User:Kiss_Regal|uploads]] | [[Special:Log/upload/User:Kiss_Regal|upload log]]).

Unclear copyright status and permission. File found here http://www.flickr.com/photos/progettuale/5680220313/in/photostream under a non-free conditions on use (all rights reserved). However, the uploader claim it to be own work, so it IS possible that the uploader is the original author of the photo in question. But in that case, we might need his statement on question RussianTrooper (talk) 12:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Reportage.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:07, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-clear copyright status. (File found here under non-free terms of use - http://www.flickr.com/photos/progettuale/5680220313/in/photostream ) However, the uploader suggested to be the original author and the file is listed as own work. In that case - we need a statement from him RussianTrooper (talk) 12:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shaista Lodhi with her kids.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The watermark essentially makes this an advertisement for https://www.facebook.com/ShaistaWahidiofficall and I can't see how you could possibly use this for any other purpose. Stefan2 (talk) 13:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JohnMcphee crop.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:09, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Terms of use from the source website[1] indicate non-commercial use only. The individual depicted is still living so presumably a free replacement could be obtained. Kelly ^hi! 14:28, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

On the website it said: "These photos may be used free of charge by the University community, including alumni, by the news media and by other non-profit groups (for educational or historic purposes)." Isn't Wikipedia considered as a news media? It certainly is a nonprofit for educational purposes.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 14:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Images which can only be used for non-profit educational purposes are not free enough for Wikipedia. See {{db-f3}}. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:05, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:56, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Somosunosanimales1991.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted; only one album cover per article per NFCC 3a. Dianna (talk) 21:54, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NFCC#3a: duplicates File:Somosunosanimales1995.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 16:10, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This cover is the 2011 version of the album included at the box set '20 años Discografia completa' but, at first, I thought it was the original cover, so I changed the label(Pasion-Area Creativa to DRO Records) and also I changed the date 1991 to 2011 in order to provide the correct information. --Akete92 (talk) 16:02, 28 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IBMSystem38.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of an IBM System/38 computer. The article has a freely licensed image, File:S38 I.jpg, so we don't need this non-free image. See Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria#1. —Bkell (talk) 18:26, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Titlebark.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused banner image from a Web site. No encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 18:47, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cheikha rimitti.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free photo that was taken directly from the Encyclopædia Britannica [2], where it has the credit "© Jack Vartoogian/FrontRowPhotos". So the source of this image is a professional photographer, and we have direct evidence that at least part of his business was licensing this photograph to an encyclopedia. So our unauthorized use of this photograph on this encyclopedia is a violation of Wikipedia:Non-free content criteria#2, respect for commercial opportunities: "Non-free content is not used in a manner that is likely to replace the original market role of the original copyrighted media." See the example of unacceptable use of non-free images described at WP:NFC#UUI, point 7: "A photo from a press or photo agency (e.g., AP, Corbis or Getty Images), unless the photo itself is the subject of sourced commentary in the article." This is an image from a photo agency (FrontRowPhotos) that is not the subject of sourced commentary in the article. —Bkell (talk) 19:16, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mayor Larry Chavis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 23:01, 29 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can't tell whether he is still alive or not so I can't tell whether the image passes WP:NFCC#1. However, it very clearly fails WP:NFLISTS. Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait - I believe Rockhead is intending to create the corresponding article – Connormah (talk) 22:34, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - he was still alive as of this 2010 article and so unless he has died recently and his unfortunate passing has not been noticed by any of our fine Virginia newspapers, I'm guessing he's still alive. --B (talk) 23:17, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Duomocatanzaro.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image came from the Italian Wikipedia, it:File:Duomocatanzaro.jpg, but it was deleted there four years ago as a copyright violation from [3]. —Bkell (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Omaha's Heartland of America Park.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:05, 23 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Low-resolution copy of File:Heartland of America Park, Omaha, Nebraska.jpg. Ineligible for F8 due to different file format. Stefan2 (talk) 19:49, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rihanna Stay Video.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violation of WP:NFCC#8. You don't need an image of her in a bathtub in order to tell that she's in a bathtub. Stefan2 (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Music articles have become polluted with these things. There's no entitlement to one per article, and there's no need for this image.—Kww(talk) 20:58, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Seriously what is the point of this image? It's just her in the bathtub, no significance, does not enhance the readers knowledge, etc. Till 00:43, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rihanna te amo video.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8: you don't need a picture of two people looking at each other to understand that they looked at each other. Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nominator, seemingly useless picture of two people and nothing else. Till 00:48, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Runthistownvideo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8: you don't need an image of three people standing in front of a strange green thing in order to understand that they stood in front of a strange green thing. Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ifitslovingmusicvideo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8: you don't need a photo of her at a beach in order to understand that she was at the beach. Stefan2 (talk) 21:39, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Even more useless than the bathtub image. Till 00:49, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George Hennard.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep - Hennard doesn't merit an article about him and the information about him is correctly included as a section within Luby's massacre per the first paragraph of WP:CRIMINAL. NtheP (talk) 17:16, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not convinced that you need a photo of the murderer in order to understand that there was a massacre. Seems to violate WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 22:08, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - As the sole perpetrator Hennard played a major role in the massacre, and since it was the deadliest mass shooting in US history at that time I would say that he is a pretty notable criminal overall. I've added a section about him to the article and moved the image there, so it does serve the encyclopedic purpose to identify the subject of said section, and therefore I'd say it should be kept. (Lord Gøn (talk) 20:42, 17 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

The thing is that a photo of the murderer doesn't help understanding the massacre. It might give you some understanding of the murderer, but the image is not used in an article about him – it is used in an article about a massacre. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:53, 20 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Just because the article is titled "Luby's massacre" doesn't mean we mustn't add a photo of George Hennard. On the contrary, as long as there is no separate article about Hennard, the article about the event serves de facto as his biography and all the info about him goes there per WP:PERP. It's the same in other such cases, see e.g. Adam Lanza. (Lord Gøn (talk) 21:33, 22 March 2013 (UTC))[reply]

Weak keep - I have gone back and forth on this over the years and different decisions have been made. Something that I think we should have is a firm rule one way or the other so that we don't get inconsistent and arbitrary decisions made on these. I lean slightly towards the weak keep side because the article is, as Lord Gon said, the de facto article on George Hennard and our policy does recognize that having a photo of the subject of a biographical article is important for the user's understanding of the topic. --B (talk) 00:19, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spoken wp shot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:11, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No foreseeable use. Stefan2 (talk) 22:48, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.