Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 June 7
June 7
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Zaina Agoro.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nkemonwudiwe (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused file, almost a duplicate of File:ZainaAgoro.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 00:27, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ncaa football sparty.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by LukeTheSpook (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Nonfree image used in Sparty not used for identification; there is, in fact, already a free image on the article. Not necessary for reader's understanding that the mascot has been featured in video games. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Elvishounddog.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by ElvisFan1981 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Insufficient rationale ("Historical Value" without any explanation). This particular performance does not require a non-free image to explain that it occurred. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Eiffel logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cybercobra (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
I don't know why we need a non-free book cover illustrating an article about a programming language. Doesn't serve to identify the language or do anything except basic illustration. (ESkog)(Talk) 02:46, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Valley arts rj advert.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rovermeiren (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC #8; image is not the subject of commentary in the article Robert Johnson (guitars). (ESkog)(Talk) 02:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The images are in context, the only problem is WP:NFCC#3a - there's no need to have two essentially equal images. Delete the ad and keep the certificate, or vice-versa (the ad provides a better view of the guitar). Diego (talk) 05:54, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFCC #1. If 100 or so of these guitars were made, then some must still exist in collections or museums. A free equivalent could be created. INeverCry 23:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have any knowledge that such is the case? It's equally likely that all guitars are in private hands or were destroyed. Without such knowledge, there's no evidence that a free alternative can be created - speculation that it might be possible is not enough to delete the image under WP:NFCC#1. Diego (talk) 06:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The question in NFCC #1 is can it be replaced, rather than has it been replaced. If there were a free alternative available, there'd be no need to ask that question, so I take it that an available free alternative isn't required, but only the likelihood that one could be found or created. If examples exist in private collections, the owner/s could photograph them. If somewhere around 100 of these guitars were created, I don't think it's unlikely that at least a few have survived in private collections or museums. Also, these 2 images show alot more than the guitar. INeverCry 16:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It doesn't work this way. You need to *know* that it can be replaced for NFCC #1 to be applicable - the criterion talks about the image being available or possible to create; for all we know, that likelihood could be 0. Once it's shown that it is possible to take a free photo, sure, then it doesn't matter how difficult it is for an editor to do it; but a reasonable procedure must be defined first, and "it might exist" is not a procedure. Now if you knew of someone who owns such guitar, then sure, we could ask them to create a free photo - but some sign that this is possible at all is required before we take the step to remove the NFC image because of NFCC#1. Diego (talk) 19:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The question in NFCC #1 is can it be replaced, rather than has it been replaced. If there were a free alternative available, there'd be no need to ask that question, so I take it that an available free alternative isn't required, but only the likelihood that one could be found or created. If examples exist in private collections, the owner/s could photograph them. If somewhere around 100 of these guitars were created, I don't think it's unlikely that at least a few have survived in private collections or museums. Also, these 2 images show alot more than the guitar. INeverCry 16:21, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you have any knowledge that such is the case? It's equally likely that all guitars are in private hands or were destroyed. Without such knowledge, there's no evidence that a free alternative can be created - speculation that it might be possible is not enough to delete the image under WP:NFCC#1. Diego (talk) 06:46, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 08:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rj certificate.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rovermeiren (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC #8; image is not the subject of commentary in the article Robert Johnson (guitars). (ESkog)(Talk) 02:48, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- There is an entire section about the Valley Arts Limited Edition Commemorative Guitar, so the image is contextually significant. Diego (talk) 05:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per WP:NFCC #1. If 100 or so of these guitars were made, then some must still exist in collections or museums. A free equivalent could be created. INeverCry 23:24, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 15 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Loca screen-shot.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Siquisloco (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
File is not in use anymore and is copyrighted and it's best to remove all unused copyrighted files. WonderBoy1998 (talk) 08:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.