Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 June 28

< June 27	June 29 >

June 28

File:Royal arms of Canada.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inferior non-free copy of File:Coat of arms of Canada.svg in a less desirable file format. DrKiernan (talk) 19:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Original svg had been deleted, and then replaced by a non fair-use and inferior picture. The original superior image has now been restored due to its mistaken deletion. Thus, this image, which was created as a (inferior) replacement, is no longer required and should be deleted. trackratte (talk) 19:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tomorrowlandentrance Cd637 (crop).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Diannaa (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Architectural sculpture Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:21, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Does an amusement ride fall under the category of sculpture? The structures in the background clearly fall under the buildings exemption as they are permanent structures designed for human occupancy. The amusement ride in the foreground is a separate issue, and while there are lots and lots of pictures here and on the commons of amusement rides, I'm not sure if it would count under sculpture (not allowed) or under another category such as vehicles (allowed). In any case, if this image is deleted, the source image (File:Tomorrowlandentrance.JPG) should be deleted as well. --Ahecht (talk) 19:38, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It might also count as a vehicle. Vehicles aren't copyrightable in the United States per Commons:COM:UA. No idea whether this is unfree or not. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Deleted: It's not a vehicle; if you look at the full image it's obviously a free-standing sculpture: File:Tomorrowlandentrance.JPG. -- Diannaa (talk) 23:54, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:General George Grunert.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete – Quadell ^(talk) 18:47, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete. Replaced by better quality image. File:Lieutenant General George Grunert.jpg Mbshaver (talk) 20:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons a different representation of the general -- 65.94.79.6 (talk) 23:48, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I am not satisfied with the sourcing. The background does not look like that of an official portrait, and it's pixellated like a scan from an old newspaper. Without adequate source info and with a plainly superior free image available, I think this one should be deleted. -- Diannaa (talk) 00:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Comparison of some tet-scales against M3P5P7.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by INeverCry (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:09, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obsoleted and noted as containing errors. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.