Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 January 18
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < January 17 | January 19 > |
|---|
January 18
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WikiProject Scouting fleur-de-lis greyscale.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by self (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
obsolete Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:49, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Move to commons -- 76.65.128.43 (talk) 04:17, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:OST Transporter 2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bluesatellite (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Violates MOS:FILM#Soundtrack. Stefan2 (talk) 13:50, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:01, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Esculapio Creative.jpeg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by S.M.Samee (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Violates WP:NFCC#8. Stefan2 (talk) 13:59, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Arvind Padhee.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bikashfunny (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
The file appears at numerous other places on the Internet, e.g. [1], but only in a smaller size as far as I can see. The article Arvind Padhee was deleted per WP:CSD#A7, so the image is probably also out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 14:08, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
![[1]](https://twimg0-a.akamaihd.net/profile_images/1888924297/image.jpg){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: No consensus -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 10:25, 10 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Tropes vs woman.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by NeilN (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Used in Anita Sarkeesian, where its stated use is "to illustrate the Kickstarter campaign". Fails WP:NFCC by featuring multiple copyrighted characters without critical commentary and threshold of necessity for inclusion. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 20:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep It is a downscaled version of the logo of the Kickstarter campaign which is discussed at length in the article. Please explain how it is different from the thousands of downscaled copyrighted movie posters and album covers Wikipedia hosts. --NeilN talk to me 20:11, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
change tag?The Flickr image (which comes from Sarkeesian herself) has a CC BY-SA 2.0 rights tag. If that's good enough for us then we should retag our copy and move on. Mangoe (talk) 14:41, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]- Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. This image is a derivative work of Princess Toadstool, Lara Croft and various other copyrighted characters. Anita Sarkeesian is not the copyright holder to those characters, so she is not permitted to publish an image of them under a free licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, parody? Just a suggestion. Mangoe (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't change the copyrights, and assembling a group of unaltered promotional images does not equate to a parody regardless. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 14:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete in light of above arguments. I would agree that free use cannot be claimed, and that fair use is not helpful to the article. Mangoe (talk) 17:04, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't change the copyrights, and assembling a group of unaltered promotional images does not equate to a parody regardless. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 14:30, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Um, parody? Just a suggestion. Mangoe (talk) 15:47, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, it doesn't work that way. This image is a derivative work of Princess Toadstool, Lara Croft and various other copyrighted characters. Anita Sarkeesian is not the copyright holder to those characters, so she is not permitted to publish an image of them under a free licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Sarkeesian's critical use of copyrighted characters fall within her rights under the fair use doctrine. Meets WP:NFCC as a logo for a campaign (and future video series) that is the subject of critical commentary in the article. Gobōnobō + c 20:16, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing about the characters is being used for critical commentary in the article—there is absolutely nothing that requires this image or would suffer from its removal. Please provide refs from the article if I'm missing something. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 14:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- It is the logo of her Kickstarter campaign, discussed in the article. I ask again, given WP:NFCI, please explain how it is different from logos, promo material, screenshots, etc. Batman Begins has no critical commentary about the poster. The logo in 1984 Summer Olympics has no critical commentary in the article. --NeilN talk to me 18:34, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nothing about the characters is being used for critical commentary in the article—there is absolutely nothing that requires this image or would suffer from its removal. Please provide refs from the article if I'm missing something. Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs(talk) 14:29, 24 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Fails WP:NFCC#8. The main topic of the article is the subject herself, not the Kickstarter campaign itself. WP:NFCI does not circumvent WP:NFCC, and it even states so in the introduction of that section. WP:LOGO#Uploading non-free logos also specifically speaks of logos used within infoboxes, not randomly throughout an article. — ξxplicit 01:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The topic of much of the article, and the section in which the image is included, is her Kickstarter campaign and the effect that had on her, and this is the campaign's logo. The image is a collage illustrating the issues she's referring to – the depiction of women – and that section fulfills to some extent the critical commentary aspect. In addition the image is so small that it can't be argued that it's doing any harm; in fact, it's arguably too small for its purpose. SlimVirgin (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. Wizardman 05:47, 8 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hotel Mehran.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nomi887 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Too small to be of any use Sreejith K (talk) 22:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It may be small, but it isn't useless at all. — ξxplicit 01:28, 26 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.