Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 January 12

< January 11	January 13 >

January 12

File:Projectappleseedorgflag.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (related to deleted article Kevin Walker (Project Appleseed)) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Projectappleseedorgtop.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (related to deleted article Kevin Walker (Project Appleseed)) Calliopejen1 (talk) 00:14, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1999Remixes.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--non-free media that add nothing critical to understanding —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:54, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak delete - It's an image of cardboard sleeves packed within the album 1999 Remixes. It isn't presented with any context in the article other than being existent as something within the album. As a non-free image being used in this manner, deletion is appropriate, unless significance or assertion of importance of the content can be ascribed within the article, which would better-qualify the use of the image. Northamerica1000^(talk) 06:19, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nichoals Berube.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An orphaned image that was uploaded in 2008 and appears to never have been used anywhere. There's no article for this person on Wikipedia, it's a red link: Nichoals Berube. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Connie3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1 and WP:NFC#UULP as Francis is still alive (moreso, according to the article, she was still performing at least as of Nov. 2011). This image was originally nominated for speedy deletion for this reason back in 2006 and declined. It has been re-nominated for speedy deletion multiple times since, and seems to have been retained since entirely based on the first retention with the subsequent CSD tags removed by the uploader. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:30, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Connie marrero 53topps-013.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFC#UUI 8 as this is not being used to illustrate the card itself, but the baseball player instead. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:35, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CWhalenBoston.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#1 and/or WP:NFCC#8. This image does not appear to help (at all, let alone significantly) the reader understand that she "helped organize the Boston and Worcester, Massachusetts Tea Parties" as indicated by the caption in the article. If being used for identification, then it is replaceable and additionally fails WP:NFC#UULP. VernoWhitney (talk) 20:38, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Owenarthurjones.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An orphaned image of an unknown person. It could be the person named in the title Owen Arthur Jones, for whom there's no article and it could simply be an image of the person who uploaded the image, who is likely non-notable per Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The latter seems to be the most likely. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:41, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PFC 002.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of an unknown person that appears to have never been used in a Wikipedia article or user page. The only page that links to the file is User talk:Wildbill6789, as a link within a file notification template. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:48, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It looks like the uploader at least attempted to use it in the A7'd article William Francis Anderson. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:00, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Philjameswilson.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image that was previously used in an article that has been deleted. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:42, 13 January 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Struck nomination, rewrote above per admin input in comment below

Orphaned image which appears likely to be an image of the uploader. It appears to have never been utilized on their red-linked user page at User:Xphilwilsonx nor on their talk page at User talk:Xphilwilsonx. Most of the entries at the disambiguation page Phil Wilson wouldn't qualify per the date of births for subjects there, and even for the few that possibly could (Phil Wilson (footballer born 1972), Phil Wilson (footballer born 1960), Phil Wilson (Texas politician)), it's entirely unclear if this image pertains to them. Northamerica1000^(talk) 20:55, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This one was used on Philip James Wilson which was nominated for A7 before the creator blanked it. VernoWhitney (talk) 21:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for providing context. Since you're an admin, it appears that you cross-checked against the revision history for the deleted article (which editors don't have access to) to provide more information, which is appreciated. The nomination has been revised. Cheers, Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:15, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plymouth3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of unknown person. It was uploaded by an editor who made many edits to the Circus Insane article, but upon going through all of the diffs, the image was never used there. It could be an image of the uploader, per the "self-made" statement as the source in the file page's summary section, or it could be "Doc Insane" who is included in the Circus Insane article, but without a name, it's impossible to determine who this is and the notability of who it may be. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:09, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ray westwood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:03, 20 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image that was previously used in an article that has been deleted. Northamerica1000^(talk) 04:41, 13 January 2013 (UTC) [reply]

Struck nomination, rewrote above per admin input in comment below
~~Orphaned image without documentation about who it is. It was never used in the Raymond Westwood article upon going through the diffs. It's uncertain who this is; is it an image of the uploader?~~ Northamerica1000^(talk) 23:47, 12 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is another one that was used for an A7'd article: Ray westwood. Entirely unrelated to Raymond as far as I can tell. VernoWhitney (talk) 04:15, 13 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks User:VernoWhitney for providing additional information. The nomination has been revised. Northamerica1000^(talk) 05:08, 17 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.