Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2013 February 9
February 9
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Love Profusion.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Beautifulstranger (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Alternate cover used in the article without any critical commentary noting its significance in understanding for the reader. Purely used for decorative purposes —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:09, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Alternative cover images that are significantly different from the original and are widely distributed pass WP:NFCC#3. Aspects (talk) 19:10, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- You are completely missing the point. It might pass WP:NFCC#3a, but it fails NFCC#8, both are not mutually inclusive. It fails because it is simply replaceable by words being a mere portrait of "the songs name on blue water and flowers floating by", and hence does not aid in reader's understanding of the article. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:57, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Unnecessary, everyone who access the article will know that the first one is the official, and it is not cited on it. 11Jorn Talk 16:55, 20 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Doesn't contribute in any way to the article, is not mentioned in the article, nothing.--LuxiromChick (talk) 01:03, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Per nom. The second cover doesn't improve readers' understanding of the topic. Bluesatellite (talk) 15:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cher-all-or-nothing-and-dove.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rsf7589 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Alternate cover used in the article without any critical commentary noting its significance in understanding for the reader. Purely used for decorative purposes. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:11, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Alternative cover images that are significantly different from the original and are widely distributed pass WP:NFCC#3. Aspects (talk) 19:12, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Same reason as above. NFCC#3a pass is not debated here. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by DeltaQuad (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:12, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SFTLeurope.JPG (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Kekkomereq4 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Fails WP:NFCC#8. Alternate cover used in the article without any critical commentary noting its significance in understanding for the reader. Purely used for decorative purposes —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 08:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: Alternative cover images that are significantly different from the original and are widely distributed pass WP:NFCC#3. Aspects (talk) 19:13, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Same reason as above. NFCC#3a pass is not debated here. —Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 09:42, 28 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
V. A. Sundaram
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete all in some form. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 18:15, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- So my poor grandfather is to be deleted. Can anyone tell me how to go about when the copyright holder, i.e. the photographer, can probably never be traced as this picture dates back to the 1930s, in India. I should think that I, being the legal owner of his picture, should also dare to claim the copyright on it. Wrong? Thanjavoor (talk) 09:25, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Not according to copyright laws. Unless you have a release from the photographer stating no claims on the photograph, the photographer retains some rights to it. This expires 70-100 years after the death of the photographer. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 23:21, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:V. A. Sundaram with C. Rajagopalachari at Krishnakutir in 1948.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thanjavoor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Possession of a photo is no indication in and of itself that you own the exclusive copyright in order to release it CC-BY-SA LightGreenApple talk to me 08:12, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: now available on the commons with appropriate licencing. ww2censor (talk) 10:13, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: This image is still copyrighted in the United States, but is out of copyright in India. --George Ho (talk) 16:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unfree, see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:V. A. Sundaram with C. Rajagopalachari in Benares 1948.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:18, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:V. A. Sundaram in the late 1930s.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thanjavoor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Possession of a photo is no indication in and of itself that you own the exclusive copyright in order to release it CC-BY-SA LightGreenApple talk to me 08:13, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: now available on the commons with appropriate licencing. ww2censor (talk) 10:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - Non-free in the US possibly, but definitely out of copyright in India. --George Ho (talk) 16:18, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:V A Sundaram, late 1930s.jpg for my arguments. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:10, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:V. A. Sundaram as a student around 1914.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Thanjavoor (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Possession of a photo is no indication in and of itself that you own the exclusive copyright in order to release it CC-BY-SA LightGreenApple talk to me 08:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: now available on the commons with appropriate licencing. ww2censor (talk) 10:12, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:V. A. Sundaram around 1914.jpg. --Stefan2 (talk) 18:14, 11 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 20:13, 7 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:RolleiLogo.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by J.P.Lon (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphaned/replaced by File:Rollei-Logo.svg. Leyo 08:15, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Sideways soundtrack.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by *drew (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Similar to the film poster of Sideways, and image itself is not of commentary. Omitting or using this image doesn't make any difference when I merged soundtrack into film page. As for the uploader, he is inactive since 2011. George Ho (talk) 08:36, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete: Non-notable soundtrack whose cover is similar to the film poster. Aspects (talk) 19:19, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Louise Glück.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ser Amantio di Nicolao (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
This appears to be a publicity photo displayed on a US government website rather than an image created by the govt. agency itself. According to the publisher's website, the copyright is held by the photographer [1]. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 22:04, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless it can be shown to have been created by the US government. LightGreenApple talk to me 22:44, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Sigrid Estrada is a professional portraitist and not an employee of the feds. Mangoe (talk) 12:40, 12 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 21:11, 1 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:P&O Cruises Australia.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Cloudbound (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unused. Superceded in use by vector version. Cloudbound (talk) 22:19, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.