Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 1

< January 31	February 2 >

February 1

File:Sebbejones.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No encyclopedic use, possible copyvio Secret ^account 06:13, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sean-Blakeley-idigit.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan promotional image no potential use Secret ^account 06:15, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scictt11.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted screenshot, orphaned Secret ^account 06:16, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shannon-hires01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan probable copyvio Secret ^account 06:20, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shlomo Yosef.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission, orphan Secret ^account 06:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Obese Teenager.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, no potencial use, not sure if its speedable though Secret ^account 06:33, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Siddarth-myworkz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Future Perfect at Sunrise (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No information provided. Duplicate image File:Siddarth.jpg listed source as google. I was unable to locate the image but looks PUF. Sumanch (talk) 07:37, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Teambox1.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I want to clear out the copyright status. As the article Teambox correctly states, this software is under Affero General Public License, then this should be mentioned somehow here, or not? mabdul 11:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

We don't have a local copy of commons:Template:AGPL, but it should be trivial to migrate either the template here or this image there. 74.74.150.139 (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Solved that problem by moving it to Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:44, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gagnongrave.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete until cropped -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 16:18, 20 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisting per Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2012 January 25. I abstain. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:07, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I don't see any reason why we need to delete this. The grave is in the public domain and is located on a United States government facility not subject to Copyright. Regardless of what the Arlington Cemetery.net website may infer it does not own the rights to an image of the grave taken by a private individual nor does it it own the rights to the gravesite. This is different than taking a picture of a painting or sculpture in a studio. --Kumioko (talk) 19:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - In addition to what Kumioko has stated, I believe the image falls into the Fair Use category under the following reasons: First, there are no apparent free equivalents or alternatives to the photographs of Rene Gagnon's headstone to be used in Gagnon's article. Second, there's no infringement to commercial purposes for images of Rene Gagnon's headstone at Arlington. Third, the image has an important encyclopedic use in illustrating how Gagnon is memorialized in death by for his role in the raising of the flag at Iwo Jima. (A larger scale example would be Lincoln's tomb of which there are multiple photographs on Wikipedia). Particularly, Gangon was re-interred in Arlington National Cemetery after first being buried elsewhere. The fact that his body was moved and then honored with this unique memorial with an addition to a standard military headstone is important unto itself. The photograph thus significantly adds to a reader's understanding of how the United States viewed the men involved in the raising of the flag at Iwo Jima and its absence would be detrimental. Fourth, this image has a home and a use. It will not exist merely to exist. Fifth, it's use is minimal. ~ (The Rebel At) ~ 22:08, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Cannot be kept as a public domain image because it contains a derivative work, not de minimis, of the copyrighted picture Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, and of the bronze relief thereof. Cannot be kept as a fair use image because it lacks the required fair use rationale and it is not clear that it is necessary to improve the reader's understanding of the related article (WP:NFCC#8). Could be kept if cropped to show only the front of the gravestone. Sandstein 19:22, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per Kumioko & RebelAt Dadge (talk) 19:42, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Crop so that the unfree back is no longer visible. The back doesn't provide any useful information anyway, per WP:NFCC#8; we already have a better image of Raising the Flag on Iwo Jima, and there isn't much else there. Now, if we were planning on using this to show what these graves look like in general, that might be a different case. But right now it's only used to illustrate the subject. --N Y Kevin @888, i.e. 20:18, 4 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, or crop, per Sandstein & NYKevin. T. Canens (talk) 15:50, 16 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Makerbot Thing-O-Matic Assembled Printing Blue Rabbit.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot verify this is free, because there is only a base URL to Flickr; however, it is on Commons, and any discussion as to its free status should occur there (nothing here would qualify as fair use). Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:05, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's at http://www.flickr.com/photos/makerbot/5526691737/. 74.74.150.139 (talk) 20:24, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bb-times-square.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Eustress (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 7 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bb-times-square.jpg; ineligible for fair use, so discussion should occur on Commons. Magog the Ogre (talk) 20:38, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

How can a photo of Times Square be "derivative"? Americasroof (talk) 00:23, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Because the focus of the photo is advertisement for Puff Daddy. Thus it is not de minimis. Magog the Ogre (talk) 01:21, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MC12.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I can't prove it. and Could not find this image in Google. But from user history it appears, this is PUF. Sumanch (talk) 22:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Tineye found a match from here, which is long gone. Wayback Machine has an archive of the text only. Clear copyvio. 74.74.150.139 (talk) 22:44, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
PUFs should go at, er, WP:PUF. Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:47, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Budluckey.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 9 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of living person. The Lovable Wolf (talk) 22:52, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vranak 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by RHaworth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 2 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no longer wanted Vranak (talk) 23:31, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.