Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 February 11

< February 10	February 12 >

February 11

File:Wiki SD75 side view.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The same user, who appears to be the owner of the image, uploaded a higher-resolution non-watermarked version to commons as File:SD75M.jpg. There is no need for this version. Mackensen (talk) 00:29, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:N516323345 2054.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

i tagged it for deletion a week ago, and apparently it was never added to the FFD, so readding it, orphan, uneyclopedic image Secret ^account 02:37, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IEEE11073 PHD Association Request 1 UML Sequence Diagram.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:05, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:05, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Once again used - not orphaned. Skier Dude (talk) 03:06, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lou-on-Set.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:El Yucateco extra hot.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:08, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NIPPSS1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned vanity photo, low quality, unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:10, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amethyst bradley ralani.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted article on en.wikipedia. no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andrew Weinreich in 2010.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_s ^(TALK) 04:12, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Church.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Timotheus Canens (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, obsoleted by File:Church clipart.svg, no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move to commons it's a PD image, the other one is CC, so has more restrictions. 70.24.247.54 (talk) 05:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The licence is not necessarily PD. According to this page, the terms of use are "You are going to have sooooooo much fun with my clipart collection! Feel free to download any of the images you'd like to have and you can use them on your own websites!" Limitation to websites only? Are derivative works allowed? --Stefan2 (talk) 00:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the CC image is a vectorization of the GIF image, so if the license for the GIF is incorrect, and it's not PD so is actually a regular copyright, then the SVG is in violation of copyright. 70.24.247.54 (talk) 05:23, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mayday Season 11 Episode 9.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free screenshot of a computer-rendered depiction of an airplane. No explanation of purpose. Article already has another, more informative picture. This one is not the object of any explicit discussion that I can find. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's an update. Why can't it have two? Qantasplanes (talk) 07:57, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:NFCC#3a and WP:NFCC#8. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:16, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HowrahBridge Monsoonclouds.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright status of the image is unclear. Actual image not found in the source provided. Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 08:09, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment very similar file (an earlier version?) is at commons:File:Howrah_Bridge_01.jpg. Thincat (talk) 11:19, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The commons image is newer, while the file in question is an earlier one. The Commons one has been wrongly claimed and uploaded as evident from the time stamp. The Commons image is nothing but a cropped and some digital enhancement of this image. Both of them must be deleted. Amartyabag ^TALK2ME 13:59, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, you are right, sorry about my mistake. The file was on Slovak wiki but was deleted on 20 August 2006.[1] I can't see why. I can't trace back further than the earliest version here. It looks as this image has been moved around in circles. Thincat (talk) 15:30, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Appears to have been uploaded to skwiki in 2005[2]. Maybe an admin at Slovak Wikipedia would be able to find out why it was deleted? There might be something on the deleted file description page. Since the Commons file is later than the Slovak Wikipedia file, it could be unfree as well. The Slovak Wikipedia logs suggest that sk:User:Ham is the photographer but Commons lists a different photographer. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

sk:User:Ham is claiming on its site, that he is member of Society of Jesus and he spent some time in Kolkata mission. --Jklamo (talk) 21:14, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Png equation 1.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A math equation created in the PNG format. Now depreciated by Help:Math. Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 17:50, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's chemistry, not mathematics. Still useless, so delete. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:33, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Png equation 2.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A math equation created in the PNG format. Now depreciated by Help:Math. Orphaned file with no foreseeable encyclopedic use. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 17:51, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Png rugby league shirt.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no foreseeable encyclopedic value. Higher quality files exist. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 17:55, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tip-of-the-day-bulb-editor(png).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file. No foreseeable encyclopedic value. More than likely out the the commons project scope as well. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 18:23, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BenzeneNitration.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:06, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Commons but deleted there because "SVG bug, better versions in Commons:Category:Electrophilic aromatic substitution reactions, not used anywhere." so I suggest we also delete on en-wiki. MGA73 (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Absolutely. --Leyo 23:11, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMGP2578RP.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality (blurry) file. No foreseeable encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 19:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sportboothafen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at German Wikipedia: http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Sportboothafen.jpg&action=edit 77.184.189.9 (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Webclock.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 10:05, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The screen shot was taken in IE 9. I had initially listed it as CSD F3. But someone objected. Bur I think it is invalid because Microsoft does not allow screenshot of their product to contain third-party content. See:Template:Microsoft screenshot. I think someone can take a screen shot using a free browser and then upload it. Sumanch (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: I cropped the image and thus this FFD is solved... 22:35, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

This is acceptable. Sumanch (talk) 02:43, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darren dowell1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This person doesn't seem to be notable. Darren Dowell has been deleted several times. Stefan2 (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Darren dowell2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

See #File:Darren dowell1.jpg above. Stefan2 (talk) 21:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frc book.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on an article which has been proposed for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reinhard Scharnagl). This should probably be deleted as unnecessary if the article is deleted. Unlikely unfree since the uploader seems to be the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CrcBeispiel.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on an article which has been proposed for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reinhard Scharnagl). This should probably be deleted as unnecessary if the article is deleted. Unlikely unfree since the uploader seems to be the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SmirfGUI.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Depends on an article which has been proposed for deletion (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reinhard Scharnagl). This should probably be deleted as unnecessary if the article is deleted. Unlikely unfree since the uploader seems to be the copyright holder. Stefan2 (talk) 21:49, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Essentiallyellington.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless image. Also a derivative work of a light show (?) and it is not clear in which country this was taken, so there might not be freedom of panorama indoors for things not permanently installed there. Stefan2 (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Essentially Ellington.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless image. Also a derivative work of a light show (?) and it is not clear in which country this was taken, so there might not be freedom of panorama indoors for things not permanently installed there. Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EEJAMSESSION.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Useless image (impossible to see what's going on). Stefan2 (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2 (New York City Subway bullet).png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image of the number two with a red circle around it. No foreseeable encyclopedic value. Alpha_Quadrant ^(talk) 22:45, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IPodPhoto4Gscreen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 19 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, useless, copyrighted stuff on the screen might not be de minimis. Stefan2 (talk) 23:26, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.