Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 December 24
December 24
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Donald in Anomaly XB-6783746.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Rat2 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free TV episode screenshot, used in infobox. FUR claims that it illustrates how "one of the biggest question in this season is revealed: Donald is September"; however, what the image shows is merely a headshot of an actor in an otherwise unremarkable surrounding. Whatever it is that makes the mentioned plot element important in this episode, the image isn't telling us anything about it above what the text does. Article consists only of plot renarration, so there is also no critical analysis in need of visual support of any kind. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:18, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep I'm not sure if you're familiar with this show, The_Observer_(Fringe)#September_.28The_Observer.29 explains its importance. Also, he appears in every episode, and is a myth through all five seasons, bald and in the black suit, now for the first time he appears as a normal man. I think it's already important enough. --R* 20:37, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- No, I am not familiar with the show, and I should not have to be – the FUR ought to be giving me all the information I need in order to judge the appropriateness of the image. You have explained the importance of the plot element and I have no doubts about that, but you have not explained why we need a visual illustration of this particular scene in order to understand the plot. In fact, we don't even know what exactly that scene is in the first place. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:35, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete I'm reading this the other way around: the image doesn't make any sense without the text. It doesn't seem to add anything to the text. Mangoe (talk) 16:04, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Speedo2010.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by PETEYTHEREF (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Orphan file, no encyclopaedic value Ronhjones (Talk) 21:34, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- delete Was used briefly (as it were) in swim briefs, but it's clear it won't ever see permanent use. Mangoe (talk) 12:33, 25 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's a great example of swim briefs / speedo - even taken personally (unlike the other photos on the page). PETEYTHEREF 12:52, 26 December 2012
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.