Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2012 April 19

< April 18	April 20 >

April 19

File:Mexacarbate Skeletal2D.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F8 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image was messed up C6541 (T↔C) 00:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Scratch that, I fixed it

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taj 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned not-particularly-good-quality photo of the taj mahal, we have many better photos on commons Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taj 05.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned not-particularly-good-quality photo of the taj mahal, we have many better photos on commons Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taj 06.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned not-particularly-good-quality photo of the taj mahal, we have many better photos on commons Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taj 07.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned not-particularly-good-quality photo of the taj mahal, we have many better photos on commons Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taj Arcade Wall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned not-particularly-good-quality photo of the taj mahal, we have many better photos on commons Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tahu bionicle.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted toy Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hershey's Cookies and Cream.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted packaging Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pohatu.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted toy Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:34, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Onua.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted toy Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kopaka.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted toy Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lewa bionicle.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted toy Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pepsi vending machine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted image on vending machine Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pepsi vending machine front.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted image on vending machine Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:35, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dole Apple Juice Bottle.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted packaging Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Go eagles go.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and of no use. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Banner honesty.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and of no use to WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jelly bean.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality - unhelpful focus vignetting Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and of no use for WP. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Table of Free Voices.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unclear encyclopedic value, no stated source, possible copyvio Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:39, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and no information about it. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taco bueno.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deelte per nom and there is no info about the subject. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Breeze and baby.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Of no value to Wp. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Taconicstaff.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Camp Taconic) Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom and WP is not facebook. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A 4 litre Cask of Australian Red Wine.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned photo of copyrighted packaging Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:45, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Circuit.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low quality Calliopejen1 (talk) 01:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mm-central.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused JPEG image, no clue what flag this is other than it is from Myanmar. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 01:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. -- Alan Liefting (talk - contribs) 01:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A M M Muze2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, source image in tr.wiki deleted for lack of source/licensing http://tr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Özel:Yükle&wpDestFile=A_M_M_Muze2.jpg Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Active expression 001.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Active expression 002.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Active expression 003.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:08, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Acorn Bobble Hat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

no verification of license, now flickr image page says copyrighted Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:09, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rapid Deployment Medical Units 03.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rapid Deployment Medical Unit 02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rapid Deployment Medical Unit 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Operating Theatre ~ Aachen 02.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Operating Theatre ~ Aachen 01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amek 9098 ~ Studio Audio Console.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Bowers) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:11, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AbrahamandNatashaLevy.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Levy) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AbrahamLevyandFriends.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Abraham Levy) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ACE2008 6-9.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no longer needed Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ACE2008 activity by candidate.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no longer needed Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:15, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Standard Of The President Of Sierra Leone.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image, replaced by SVG. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire)} 02:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Abjectionmodel1.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unhelpful depiction of abstract concept that seems (this particular depiction seems to be user-invented) Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AaroHellaakoskibust.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned sculpture that still seems to be under copyright given date of creation Calliopejen1 (talk) 02:18, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LaFamiliaBJ.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal photo -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 13:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lakeshore East (facing south).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Let the records play logo 3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image with no encyclopedic value -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:25, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Line272.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Userspace image with no genuine purpose for a user account that has been blocked. no need for this anymore -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:33, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lrivera(1).JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal photos -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LRivera(2).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan personal photo -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lu Hitler antichrist21.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Image is made from photo of Hitler and the Nazi flag. Unknown source for either. Unknown copyright on photo. Has no encyclopedic value as is -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ludovico de luigi san francisco.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image is copy of a painting: [[1]] which was completed in 1968. I doubt it is out of copyright. -- ТимофейЛееСуда. 14:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jaleel White Steve Urkel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious NFCC violation, photo is controlled/licensed by Getty Images.[2] There's certainly no reason to replace the screenshot which illustrated the article for uears, and clearly satisfies NFCC requirements. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 15:19, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep — this is a promo image. Well, it says "Getty Images/Fotos International", but I'm sure the use of this image doesn't affect sales of this photo. It was uploaded to Getty in 2008. NFCC#2 requires that commercial opportunities be respected; I'm not using any other images of Jaleel White for primary identification of "Steve Urkel". This photo is clearer and crispier than the screenshot. I believe that original role of electronic distribution of this photo is not infringed, as the resolution of this photo is lower than 250 horizontal pixels lowers chances to surpass the superior copies of this photo. Moreover, I assure that electronic distributions are no substitutes for photo papers, as e-photos come and go, like fansites and legit articles. The Getty Images says that a commercial or promotional use requires permission. I'm sure that educational use in Wikipedia is not part of promotional or commercial use. --George Ho (talk) 16:13, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

George, you are dead wrong. There is no evidence that this is a "promotional" photo. You certainly haven't provided any. It is a photograph of an actor in character. That is not necessarily a promotional photo, and such images are often created for editorial use. It is listed for licensing by Getty Images, at the link I provided in my nomination stratement. Under WP:F7 and WP:NFC#UUI #7 its deletion is required. The fact that Getty might allow noncommercial/educational on Wikipedia itself is irrelevant, because all content here should be suitable for reuse in commercial republication, per WMF policy, whenever possible. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 17:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Why would Magog the Ogre, administrator, disagree with you? --George Ho (talk) 18:17, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't; all he did was decline a speedy nom because "CSD is written in such a way that if there is doubt, it is preferable to go through discussion process (i.e., WP:FFD)." You should pay more careful attention to his comments to you on his talk page. As he said, the prior image was clearly acceptable, this one is dubious; and the only argument you make against applying the mandatory deletion rule is your unsupported opinion. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 18:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This says it is ABC, but what do I know? Others say Getty, but some says ABC: DailyMail UK, On the Red Carpet (move mouse to photo to see hidden caption) (or [3]). What about a different promo image: [4] (same alternative image)? That should ease conflicts, so this revision could be deleted.--George Ho (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I received mail from We hope, and this copy was autographed and proves that it may be (or may not be) a promotional image. I wonder if it helps proven a prior publication. --George Ho (talk) 23:29, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:Just my two cents worth. The photo was created in 1990 and the show began in 1989 on ABC. It ran there until 1997 and finished the last year of its original airing at CBS in 1998. The Getty information says it wasn't copyrighted until 2008. There was an 18 year opportunity for the image to have uses other than by licensing it from Getty. Getty's restrictions on the photo say that if someone wants to use it for commercial or promotional purposes, that's considered on a case by case basis. At present, it's available without question for editorial purposes. Flickr users also have the option to license their photos to Getty. Since the person behind the character is now 35 years old, it's not likely he would be reviving the character and there would be a large demand for a photo of this type other than for historic purposes. We hope (talk) 16:46, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy via CSD#F7 - Hullaballoo Wolfowitz is 100% correct. The criteria is clear - is this article about this image? No. So it must be speedied. Non-free images or media from a commercial source (e.g., Associated Press, Getty), where the file itself is not the subject of sourced commentary, are considered an invalid claim of fair use and fail the strict requirements of WP:NFCC; and may be deleted immediately.

Comments on some of the comments - ebay is not a "prior publication" and, even if it were, it was not meant to apply to images from commercial sources. We Hope explained why it needs to be be speedied even if they did not realize it. They point out that Getty says: if someone wants to use it for commercial or promotional purposes, that's considered on a case by case basis. This reinforces the image is non-free and it reinforces that Getty is making money from it. Even without that the fact the metadata clearly says "Copyright holder: 2008 Getty Images" nulls any sort of discussion about this image being allowable on Wikipedia servers beyond an article on the image itself. Publicity photos on their own come from many many various sources and discussions occur here time after time about allowing their "free" use. These discussions mostly go around in circles because, at the bottom line, if a file is not free to use for any reason it is non-free. Soundvisions1 (talk) 18:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:The last part of this escapes me "at the bottom line, if a file is not free to use for any reason it is non-free." because the photo was licensed as a non-free use. If a discussion wasn't considered to be pertinent, why were two SD requests declined? We hope (talk) 18:41, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Magog declined it the first time due to doubts. Magog declined it the second due to this ongoing discussion. --George Ho (talk) 19:20, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Look, as said before, if no one minds, I can still use the same name of the file, upload a new photo that does not originate from Getty or AP or any other press agency. Then, if new photo is uploaded with same name, then this discussion will be closed. Sounds good? --George Ho (talk) 18:35, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Wait! Here are license information and agreements. Let's evaluate before conclusion comes. --George Ho (talk) 07:09, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, now orphaned. We can easily illustrate this character with a screenshot taken directly from the show, like the one that's now used in the article. That of course is still non-free, but it avoids any ambiguities over the Getty situation. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:24, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment:This sounds like a reasonable way to go. It seems that earlier copies of the photo were distributed by ABC and it was transferred to Getty much later. An ABC marked and dated copy of the photo may turn up, George, and that would be proof that it wasn't handled by Getty at that time. We hope (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The source says "Fotos International", previously owned by Max B. Miller. However, we are not sure if Fotos or ABC is the original source, but... ah well. --George Ho (talk) 17:06, 25 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. There's no indication that ABC ever distributed this image, as a promo photo or otherwise, prior to White's appearance on DWTS. Since that postdates the Getty listing, it's presumably a licensed use. The 2008 Getty date is something of a red herring anyway, since that indicates the date Getty became the licensing agent, not that the image wasn't previously marketed for commercial licensing. It's also important to keep in mind that while older promo photos became public domain because they were distributed without copyright notices, this image is covered by modern copyright law, which allows such distribution without loss of copyright protection. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 16:18, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NOM promotional image and Obama rally image comparison 300px.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It is a collage of two images at least one of them copyrighted by Reuters. As such it Fails fair use guideline. the article is not primarily about the Reuters photo or photographer. Neither it significantly increase the understanding of the article subject: it is about a marginal controvesy which essence is perfectly clear from its verbal description. Staszek Lem (talk) 19:59, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The photo shows the immense size of Obama's crowd as compared to the half dozen supporters for NOM. Binksternet (talk) 20:23, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails NFCC#8 since essentials are conveyed by text and incorporates news agency image. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 14:07, 20 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andy Doyle Smiling.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user photo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:27, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AngleSolver.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Limited foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 20:42, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Angus wiki.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 20:46, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AnimalShow.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 20:48, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anituner.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused icon. Low quality. Cloudbound (talk) 20:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anna-jabba.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anna-Sophia Dilley.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user photo. Cloudbound (talk) 20:53, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Amsdoort.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low quality photo. Cloudbound (talk) 21:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Analytics 3scapism 1 png.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused screenshot. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 21:43, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ananyah.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user-created image. Cloudbound (talk) 21:50, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anastasia Romanov Portrait 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution image. Cloudbound (talk) 21:51, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andreas Gundersen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused photo. Little foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 22:04, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Andrew - Trumpet Bash.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user photo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Antet.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused logo. No foreseeable use. Cloudbound (talk) 22:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Anti-D's Cover.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused user-created image. Cloudbound (talk) 22:16, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Aramco Helicopter.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:22, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low resolution photo. Cloudbound (talk) 22:31, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.