Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 September 22

< September 21	September 23 >

September 22

File:Pascal et past.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Quadell (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, used in a now deleted copyvio. Possibly copyrighted. no foreseeable use. FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FromRussia1959.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

From Russia, with Love (novel) has three non-free book covers, when one would suffice, which is a WP:NFCC#3a violation. I think the first edition, File:RussiaFirst.jpg, should be used, and this later cover should be deleted. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Frwlpenguin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(as above) – Quadell ^(talk) 14:18, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A Last Stand.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a painting by Errol Fuller. Uploaded with the comment "I own the copyright" but with no evidence offered. Hairhorn (talk) 16:48, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The Lurker in the Dark.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a painting by Errol Fuller. Uploaded with the comment "I own the copyright" but with no evidence offered. Hairhorn (talk) 16:50, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John the Revelator.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a painting by Errol Fuller. Uploaded with the comment "I own the copyright" but with no evidence offered. Hairhorn (talk) 16:51, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Small Raigad01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, small, not enough description to be identifiable – Quadell ^(talk) 17:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Small waterfall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, small, not enough info to be identifiable – Quadell ^(talk) 17:29, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per Nom, also was in first userpage over one year so I doubt he'll use it again. intelati talk 20:03, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Smiley face.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Moved to Commons. – Quadell ^(talk) 17:08, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused low-quality smily face – Quadell ^(talk) 17:32, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Excuse me? It is used thank you. In my user space. I want a crudely drawn smile there. It's part of my personal taste. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 15:21, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well that's fine, but at the time it showed that it wasn't used... unless I'm going crazy... Anyway, if you like it and want to use it, I have no problem with that. Should we move it to Commons? – Quadell ^(talk) 15:31, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 16:39, 23 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've moved it. Sorry about the trouble. – Quadell ^(talk) 17:08, 26 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:So Random 013.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, useless title, no description, no idea which school this is, probably wouldn't be useful if we knew – Quadell ^(talk) 18:22, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mark Hyman3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned files, no foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξ ^xplicit 20:37, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:You Got Me video.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 10:06, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8. The image appears to serve a purely decorative purpose in the article You Got Me (J.Williams song). There is no critical commentary, either in the body of the article or the image caption, about this particular screenshot from the music video. The fact that the music video featured J.Williams and Scribe is mentioned in the text and the presence of this image does not "significantly increase readers' understanding" of this point and its absence would not "be detrimental to that understanding". (Although DASHBot is listed as the uploader, the image was uploaded originally by Adabow and was subsequently resized by DASHBot.) -- Black Falcon ^(talk) 21:19, 22 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.