Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 October 7

< October 6	October 8 >

October 7

File:U-KISS Neverland cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Violates WP:NFCC#8. I have no idea why this is being used to be honest, this isn't even an album cover, but a teaser image. — ξ ^xplicit 02:11, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Unless someone can come up with a sourced discussion of the advertising campaign, this has no place in Wikipedia.—Kww(talk) 18:54, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Douglas Tsoi2008.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unencyclopedic Douglas dt (talk) 05:34, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:OP-19817.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image initially removed from The General (locomotive) as failing WP:NFCC#8, where (A) free images exist of the same subject, and (B) there was nothing special enough about the 1939 exhibition of the locomotive to require use of a non-free image to show it. The removal was challenged, and so it's now up for discussion. SchuminWeb (Talk) 11:12, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tawakel Karman.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by Dragons flight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:16, 8 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I doubt that the uploader owns the rights on this file. Hektor (talk) 12:22, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unlikely, since (s)he quotes the source - I've marked it for "di-no permission". Ronhjones ^(Talk) 18:41, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0067phokingrestaurant.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of the marquis of a non-notable restaurant. Orphan, not useful. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:52, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0081.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Random building, bad title, orphan, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 13:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0090.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Photo of statue (bad title). Copyright status of statue unknown. Used only on a talk page. – Quadell ^(talk) 13:56, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0102.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Derivative work of the sculpture depicted. See Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Bulgaria for more. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:00, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0115.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bad title, man standing next to graffitti, not useful. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:02, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0132.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan image, bad title, no description, some building, not useful – Quadell ^(talk) 14:06, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IMG 0153 Tenkei.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A color-corrected version with a better name is at File:Re Tenkei 1.JPG. – Quadell ^(talk) 14:10, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LiberianWomen.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:40, 15 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

replaceable non-free image. organization still exists, a similar photo could be created. Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:58, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a screen shot of live video footage recorded during the Liberian Civil War. The organized peace protests during the war is what made this group famous and powerful. Yes, another peace protest can be organized in the future, but this is a historic document of the original event – which is now used as a model in other countries. Even if another Liberian civil war breaks out in the future, it would not be the same as the original. — Preceding unsigned comment added by USchick (talk • contribs)

Delete Fails WP:NFCC#8. It's an image of women holding signs. This can be expressed in words adequately and the omission of the photo would not be detrimental to the understanding of the topic. Hekerui (talk) 13:26, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Keep The women of Liberia were ordinary women who were not taken seriously and were completely ignored by warlords, politicians, journalists, and everyone else. Then once they became powerful, they were announced as "General Leymah and her troops." The photo is necessary to show what the women actually looked like during the war and at the time of their protests. They were always consistent in their dress (white t-shirts) with their home made signs. The photo is necessary to show that they were ordinary women, not revolutionaries, not supported by any outside interests, not funded by any outside sources, and yet, in spite of all that, they became a major political force. There is no other example in recent history where this happened. The photo is vital to telling this story. USchick (talk) 18:11, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Image shows a particular event, not a generic incidence of women protesting in Liberia. It adds to an understanding of the text of that section of the page, in a way that words alone would not. It shows, for example, the demeanor as well as the dress of the women, and the content, appearance, and composition of their signs. To my mind, it does pass NFCC#8. --Tryptofish (talk) 18:52, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Schlacht von Panipat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons. Please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copywrite violation - The version from exoticindiaart.com is a modern interpretation, copyright Navrang. It is not a faithful version of the original, although it uses the same composition. It should be deleted and replaced with the previous, 16th century, version. 210.1.205.96 (talk) 22:07, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.