Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 March 14

< March 13	March 15 >

March 14

File:Fostershomeoutside.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:10, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The way the image is being used does not meet non-free content criteria (based on contextual significance). Blurpeace 01:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. This image currently fails WP:NFCC#8. Most of the Foster's episodes and characters got merged, redirected or deleted due lack of sources. JJ98 (Talk) 04:09, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: Purely decorative use, fails requirement number 8: Contextual significance. Currently being used with the "Annie Awards" section, which has nothing to do with the image at all. Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per Soundvisions. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:57, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Panchira4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

CV. Very likely a copyrighted work (and uploader lied about that).
Upload by a banned user.
Not used anywhere nor likely to be.

See this Commons thread (warning: long) for verification of point #1. Text titles makes it look very much like it's a screencap. User was asked to provide some evidence that his uploads are his own work and refused to do so. Herostratus (talk) 03:26, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Based on the users other Wikipedia uploads I would say there is no reason to doubt this is also a non-free image. Delete as a possible copyvio. Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above arguments. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:55, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jackfigurelost.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:11, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image does meet the criteria for WP:NFCC. Only one source, this file has no rationale. JJ98 (Talk) 04:12, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: This does have a fur, just not a templated one. One of the reasons this image is being used, according to the FUR is: It is an image of a toy product, which serves a purpose to induce consumers to purchase the toy. Interested consumers may purchase the item in question at various major retailers. Wikipedia is not a sales catalog so that is an invalid rationale. The other two reasons given are just generic "stock" explanations. Being of low rez and the fact it is being used in the Lost (TV series) are not valid reason as to why it is needed in the article. The related text is In May 2006, McFarlane Toys announced recurring lines of character action figures and released the first series in November 2006, with the second series being released July 2007. There is no need to see this particular image,, of this specific toy, in that context. If that was all of the critical commentary that were needed the article would have all sorts of user created derivative images and publicity images showing toys and games, four 1000-piece jigsaw puzzles, clothing, jewelry and other collectibles and any other item that is briefly mentioned. Soundvisions1 (talk) 12:07, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fancruft, not justified by fair use guidelines. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DSC003341.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by B (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:19, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is using Wikipedia as an image hosting service. This is their only contribution to Wikipedia, and the image has no encyclopedic value. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Image is unencyclopedic and has no use in any articles. –Dream out loud (talk) 20:41, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GracieShamrock 2 (Medium) (Small).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is a non-free video screenshot showing a martial artist with a "badly bruised" face, being used to convey the information that this martial artist had his face badly bruised during a professional fight. That the fighter got hit during a fight is a trivial (and expected) information that need not an illustration to be understood. The specific points on his face where his blood is mining is not of relevance. The article says he got hurt and that's enough. Damiens.rf 16:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ken ufc 19 cage tito.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unecessary non-free video screenshot showing two guys arguing, used just to let the reader know that the two guys argued. Damiens.rf 16:49, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shamrock Frye heel hook screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free video screenshot showing on martial artist applying on of the many maneuvers he applied on one of his many opponents. The moment itself is not specially notable, not does it needs an image to be understood (in both articles where it's being used). Damiens.rf 16:54, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Shamrock trejo champions.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free movie poster for a non-notable movie just mentioned in an article. Damiens.rf 16:56, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Francesser Pretzels.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

There's a free image of this living person available. Damiens.rf 17:00, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fedor Emelianenko getting rocked by Kazuyuki Fujita at PRIDE.26 .jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fedor Emelianenko and Semmy Schilt at Pride 21.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kevin Randleman throwing Fedor Emelianenko at PRIDE GP 2004 2nd ROUND.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:03, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fedor Emelianenko wins over Mirko Cro Cop at PRIDE GP 2005.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:04, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Art Jimmerson, UFC 1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image of a living person. Damiens.rf 17:05, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To be fair, the original image is published under a CC license- it's just incompatible with Wikipedia due to the NC stipulation. —Bill Price (nyb) 23:29, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As I said, non-free. --Damiens.rf 13:10, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SilvaJacksonPride28.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. It contains no special information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JacksonSilvaUFC92.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unnecessary non-free image showing a moment in a fight. Contains no relevant information that can not be transmitted by text alone. Damiens.rf 17:06, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Suchet in studio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. The same article that this image was used in, Agatha Christie: Murder on the Orient Express, has other images that also likely warrant some attention. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:36, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a voice actor in a studio, used in the article about the video game for which he was working. Not needed to understand the relevant info in the article, and no visual details in the photograph that are the object of any discussion. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:52, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - this photograph is used to illustrate the development process of the game, which is discussed in a significant section of the article called "Development". The voice acting was discussed in "Development", as were the voice actors comments, thus I feel this photo does in fact add an important aspect about the development of the game, to the article. "no visual details in the photograph that are the object of any discussion" is a simple lie.--Paaerduag (talk) 02:36, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: First is the flawed FUR so it fails 10c. There is no indication this was released into the Public Domain (If it was it would be free, not being used under our NFCC policy) and It is not a screenshot from the game. Next is number 8. As the nom says it is not needed to understand the section of the article in question. As the nom points out the image itself is not discussed, it is not a "lie" by any means. The article contains a section about actors who provided voices - "voice acting". In general we do not need to see any image of an actor acting to understand they are an actor who acts. This image simply shows an actor acting. The same principal applies to an article on a singer - we don't require a non-free image showing them singing because they're are a singer. For an author the same - we don't need a non-free image of them sitting in front of a typewriter to understand they are a writer. Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:57, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1,4-butanediol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense. Leyo 22:33, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1-heptanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense. Leyo 22:34, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1-hexanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1-pentanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:35, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1-tetradecanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:36, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-mercaptoethanol Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:38, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-hexanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:39, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2,2,2-trichloroethanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-butanol Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:40, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-butoxyethanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-ethoxyethanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:41, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-ethylhexanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2-methoxyethanol-Ball-and-Stick-Animation.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not showing the hydrogen atoms in a ball-and-stick model does not make sense chemically. Leyo 22:42, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is a non-standard, non-ideal way of depicting chemical compounds. ChemNerd (talk) 20:12, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lituya bay megatsunami.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading, inaccurate, and lacks encyclopedic value. See the talk page or this Reddit discussion for details. In addition, the copyright/licensing status is incorrect: this is not an original work, but rather a derived work of File:NY Height Comparison.png. —Bill Price (nyb) 23:24, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Devil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:20, 21 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Clearly, this image does not meet the Non-free content criteria policy. Fails WP:NFCC#8. JJ98 (Talk) 23:50, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.