Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 27
February 27
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:04, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:4ducale1palmagiovane.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Artlover6 (notify | contribs | uploads).
Orphaned file, unidentified subject. — ξxplicit 06:12, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Uploader have only edited Palma Giovane and palmagiovane is a part of the name so I asume the photo has something to do with that article. But the photo does not seem to focus on "something" so I doubt it will ever be used. --MGA73 (talk) 17:31, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per above. If kept, please move to Commons. Rehman 07:23, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: it's a room in the Palazzo Ducale, Venice, showing Palma Giovane's painting seen here. Keep (or move to Commons) unless there are copyright problems with the picture. It might be a copyvio from here, but I can't verify that website was earlier than our version. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The user also claimed to be the author of File:1cicogn1palmagiovane.jpg (see old version), so I don't think we can take this user's claim of authorship at face value. I don't know if they copied it from lib-art.com or somewhere else, but I would say there's virtually no chance that it's actually a user-authored image. The two files they uploaded have the same naming convention ... so I'm guessing they were copied from somewhere. --B (talk) 01:59, 6 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: it's a room in the Palazzo Ducale, Venice, showing Palma Giovane's painting seen here. Keep (or move to Commons) unless there are copyright problems with the picture. It might be a copyvio from here, but I can't verify that website was earlier than our version. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:51, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:27, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:4th Infantry Brigade1.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by TheMightyGeneral (notify | contribs | uploads).
Orphaned file, duplicate of File:4th Infantry Brigade.jpg, but in a different format. — ξxplicit 06:14, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, dupe of File:4th Infantry Brigade.jpg. Rehman 07:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:28, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:5 + 1 Logo I.svg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Flakeyswilson (notify | contribs | uploads).
Orphaned file, no use stated. — ξxplicit 06:15, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, per nom. Rehman 07:24, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SarajevoFlag.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Bigz (notify | contribs | uploads).
Obsoleted by File:Flag of Sarajevo.svg; {{badgif}} regardless Magog the Ogre (talk) 07:05, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, good replacement exists. Rehman 07:25, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 04:30, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ferking.gif (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Ovs (notify | contribs | uploads).
This appears to be original research. Quoting from the image description, "This is imagery of my making. It is based upon the period carvings found throughout Scandinavia". I haven't been able to verify any depiction of the subject Ferking - indeed, I haven't been able to verify any basic facts about the subject - but a low-quality line drawing based on one editor's interpretation of some carvings is probably not an appropriate image. — Gavia immer (talk) 22:23, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, we need a specific source, otherwise it just looks like a cartoon character that could be anyone. Swarm X 01:29, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.