Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 August 4

< August 3	August 5 >

August 4

File:Shangani patrol back cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:WiltsPolUniform.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

While the uploader took the picture, it depicts a badge that will be copyright to Wiltshire Police for which we have a better copy File:Wiltspolice.png Mt king ^(edits) 03:27, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Skins 501.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free TV episode screenshot. Apparently random scene, not embedded in analytical commentary, not necessary for understanding the article, purely decorative infobox use. By long-standing consensus and precedent at FFD, TV episodes are not automatically entitled to one screenshot merely for "identification"; any image needs to individually pass NFCC#8 by contributing to the understanding of explicitly discussed analytical material. (Besides, it is unclear in what way this shot would even serve as "primary visual identification" in the first place). Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ubuntuwindowsopen.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. Although Ubuntu is open-source it isnot GFDL like the current licensing states. Additionally, individual programs and images (e.g., Firefox logo) may not be freely licensed. Since it isn't in use anyway, delete it due to possible copyright problems. –Drilnoth (T/C) 13:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chapter 27 screenshot.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free movie screenshot, used in addition to another image already in infobox. Apparently random scene, not embedded in analytical commentary, not the object of explicit discussion. Meaningless boilerplate FUR. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:45, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The image is used to illustrate the weight gained by Jared Leto for his role. And Leto's performance (that won various awards) is one of the most important facts of the film.--Earthh (talk) 16:46, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Isn't Leto's weight gain sufficiently illustrated by the film poster, which is in the infobox? I think the poster does a better job of showing this than this screenshot does. —Bkell (talk) 17:17, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The film poster doesn't work as the screenshot does. It includes also Lohan that has a leading role in the film.--Earthh (talk) 19:08, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jr Ridge Cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. Summary says, "Copyright of Junior Ridge Staff," but tagged with {{GFDL-self-with-disclaimers}}. —Bkell (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southridgei.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused wordmark for a school, apparently created by the uploader; no evidence that this logo has any official status. —Bkell (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nikotma.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tiny, unused image. Looks likely to be a copyright violation from somewhere—Google Image Search turns up several larger versions of this image (see [1]). —Bkell (talk) 16:10, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Venstre logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, obsoleted by File:Venstre (DK).svg. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hosea M. Knowlton.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality (lots of noise), replaced by File:Hosea M. Knowlton cph.3b32615.jpg, howcheng {chat} 16:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I like the new picture, it is an improvement over the old one. Thanks! Wmcewenjr

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LCC.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Moved to Commons, deleted here per F8. A different file of the same name is now visible from Commons. –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems, that this file if awfully bad, so that nobody doesn't want anything to do with it, moreover to transfer it to Commons. So if really is so dangerous, do something with it! Kusurija (talk) 16:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete:

I don't agree --Kusurija (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: Yes, Keep it or transfer to Commons please. Please, I beg You. --Kusurija (talk) 16:57, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comments: If there are problems with filename, You can rename it e.g. File_Klaipėda's LCC International University or something similar.
Keep. What's going on here? The file is in-use (and is the only picture in LCC International University) and the licensing status seems legit. Just because nobody's moved it yet doesn't mean that somebody won't in the future. Heck, I'll move it to Commons after this closes if you'd like. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please, be so kind. Thank You in advance. --Kusurija (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Done. In the future, if you just want a file moved to Commons, just let somebody know (most admins should know who to contact if they can't do it themselves). –Drilnoth (T/C) 18:34, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:American Sherman tank Battle of Kapyong 23 April 1951 (AWM P04953).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξ ^xplicit 05:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

as above Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

oops, meant to put this at WP:PUI - never mind Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:53, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - The Australian War Memorial clearly lists the status of the image as "Copyright expired - public domain". Please see here [2]. Anotherclown (talk) 07:52, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: clearly listed as PD at its source. I understand that you have the best intentions, however, you have nominated a number of similarly licenced images. Please slow down and wait to see the results of these debates before nominating others. If the consensus is that they should be deleted, then fair enough, but otherwise it seems unfair on the uploader. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 13:41, 6 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KarynPolito.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

MA gov does not release works into public domain, source website marked copyrighted Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:28, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jar-Jar Jetpack.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, unencyclopedic in every respect. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:36, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Reynoldson666Tattoo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal image; unencyclopedic. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Juggercover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

What is this? Orphaned, uploaded by blocked user, poor quality (should be SVG), probably unencyclopedic. –Drilnoth (T/C) 17:43, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Icespliffwood.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spliffwood101s.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mikhailmiller.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unused. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 17:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cybertown.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File has sketchy fair use rationale at best but still no license. Plus the uploader has stated this is the logo but if you check the source [http;//www.cybertown.com here] you can see that it is just artwork and not the actual logo. Fallschirmjäger ✉ 18:02, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fosters pint.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted advertisement used to decorate article, meaningless pseudo-rationale. Kelly ^hi! 18:40, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:William-stones-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Old superseded product logo, no discussion of this logo offered in the article text. Kelly ^hi! 18:48, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beamish.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image used only for decoration. The article already includes an instance of the product logo. Kelly ^hi! 19:38, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ceannt.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned graph, no use unless someone knows where it applies Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:41, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lot pic 1.jpg and 4 others

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete all. — ξ ^xplicit 05:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned picture of a car park, unencyclopaedic. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:50, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chesterfield Supper Club in the air2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Athaenara (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

fails WP:NFCC8 (does not significantly add to readers' understanding) and WP:NFCC1 (could be replaced by text description). i agree that this was a cool/important event, but this photo does not add anything beyond that added by a sentence stating that there was a radio show from an airplane Calliopejen1 (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blue-moon-bottle.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image being used to decorate article, which already includes an instance of the product logo. Kelly ^hi! 20:24, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guinness Toucan-ad.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Author and copyright holder not identified per WP:NFCC#10a. Kelly ^hi! 20:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Coalition of Immokalee Workers logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. Nominated makes little sense. — ξ ^xplicit 05:42, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

obsolete Sandillero (talk) 20:44, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is still in use, so I wouldn't call it obsolete... –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:58, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Green Label.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:09, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image decorating blended malt. Replaceable by a free image per WP:NFCC#1. Kelly ^hi! 21:18, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Without a label indicating that the bottled spirit is a blended malt, an illustration would be meaningless to the article. For example, a free image could be a plain, unmarked bottle of any light brown, clear liquid. But the example of the branded spirit used to illustrate the article, with its label clearly indicating that it is a blended malt beverage, more appropriately illustrates the article. There is no free image available in this case, as all legally sold spirits have a brand label. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 22:20, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Question - what understanding is the image adding for the reader per WP:NFCC#8? Kelly ^hi! 21:59, 5 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As an example of how a blended malt whisky is so labeled, e.g. to distinguish it from a single malt. Lacking the photo, the subject matter is ungrounded in its practical aspect. Geoff ^{Who, me?} 21:52, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't that be explained with text? Why is a non-free image required? Kelly ^hi! 22:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sambas Flag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, obsoleted by superior File:Sambasflag.svg. –Drilnoth (T/C) 22:15, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.