Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 August 16

< August 15	August 17 >

August 16

File:Rufusmallory.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The source given at the file description page is a dead link, and I can't find the new link for it. This image is an orphan, and File:Rufus Mallory.JPG and File:Rufusmallory brady.GIF are each larger images on Commons that are used in the article Rufus Mallory. Jsayre64 (talk) 03:32, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fine to delete then. – Quadell ^(talk) 18:37, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Casignana coat of arms.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Source is a deadlink, permission does not match license, no evidence that this is free use. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:49, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

keep non free logo Slowking4: 7@1|x 18:24, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FSF-Icon.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is, as far as I can tell, a copyrighted logo, not used in the article space. Running with concurrent discussion at Commons Sven Manguard Wha? 04:03, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Geometrics-band-2009.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No source, summary claims PD, license is GFDL, with no source, no way to tell if either is accurate. Description leads me to believe that uploader thought "on the internet" = "public domain". Sven Manguard Wha? 04:11, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: Uploader added http://www.facebook.com/pages/Geometrics/106350152730623 as a source and removed the FFD tag, but there is no evidence of permission. Tagged for deletion per F11. –Drilnoth (T/C) 16:16, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guaranda Flag.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As with most stuff from or derived from flagspot, this is probably inaccurate. this page from the city's website does indicate that the crest is (somewhat) accurate, and that the flag has those stripes, but does not show the crest on the flag. Sven Manguard Wha? 04:25, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Martinreagan.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence of permission, unacceptably vague source. Although the uploader is more than likely associated with martin, the attribution is all wrong here. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:34, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Qari Muhammad Farooq.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, no source, conflicting licenses. Sven Manguard Wha? 05:47, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Minorthreat-cv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Virtually identical to the original, red cover. The differences can be completely discussed in prose, so FUR cannot be valid. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:24, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1973World600Winner.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of a winner of a motor race, used in the article about the race. Fails NFCC#8; nothing in the understanding of the article hinges on the visual presence of this scene. Fut.Perf. ☼ 12:48, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Remaining three uploads of User:Whitewig24

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC) This uploader originally stated that he got the images from the official website, and claimed fair use. Then he changed it to say GFDL, but the images do appear at http://www.theathenaeum.org.uk/ and there is no evidence of a free license. Almost all the uploader's uploads have been deleted as copyvios or as not giving source info. These are copyvios. See Wikipedia:Media copyright questions#Images for Liverpool Athenaeum for more. – Quadell ^(talk) 12:55, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2006-04-09-5311-20D.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphan, bad file name, no encyclopedic value mabdul 14:36, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It's a decent photo, and could be useful. It's already tagged to be transferred to Commons, which is appropriate. Why would you delete it here before it's transferred? Transfer, then delete. – Quadell ^(talk) 17:30, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2007juneEVE.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yet another dog photo which is orphan and doesn't be in any kind encyclopedic... mabdul 14:41, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The breed and age of the dog are given, and it's of reasonable quality. It could be useful. It should be moved to Commons, and deleted here only afterwards. – Quadell ^(talk) 17:28, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:212940.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:08, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

we are neither a webhost nor a social-network, image from a not notable person ;) mabdul 14:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, this image of a Wikipedian is used on her userpage to identify herself. This is totally acceptable. Many of your deletion nominations are out of line. – Quadell ^(talk) 17:31, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: There is also broad consensus that you should not have any image in your userspace that would bring the project into disrepute and you may be asked to remove such images. Content clearly intended as sexually provocative (images and in some cases text) or to cause distress and shock that appears to have little or no project benefit or using Wikipedia only as a web host or personal pages or for advocacy, may be removed by any user (or deleted), subject to appeal at deletion review.[Note 2] Context should be taken into account. Simple personal disclosures of a non-provocative nature on sexual matters (such as LGBT userboxes and relationship status) are unaffected. from Wikipedia:User_pages#Images This user is inactive and wasn't never really active on Wikipedia (2 userpage comments, one talkpage comment and another one edit in article space, rest own userpage). The user should have created a Facebook account instead. mabdul 18:42, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I don't have any interest in telling the user whether she should be on Facebook or not, but this is absolutely not an image that will bring the project into disrepute. If it causes "distress or shock" to you, then I don't know what to say. Many people have photos of themselves on their user pages, (including me), and we don't delete them just because the Wikipedian's aren't active anymore. Please don't continue to nominate such images for deletion. – Quadell ^(talk) 19:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep if it shocks you use the image filter. [1] Slowking4: 7@1|x 18:36, 22 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:2262616360084635217LXxlaD ph.GIF

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Speedy delete - copyvio Reaper Eternal (talk) 18:04, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

non notable person, bad file naming, orphan... mabdul 14:43, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Steve Reeves.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Free image available. damiens.rf 15:27, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Odetta Sings Ballads and Blues - original back cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Invalid FUR--not discussed in article. Scan is just a copyvio. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 20:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canadas Wonderland VIP Tour.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Having the logo in Canada's Wonderland does not help with the understanding and it is mostly for decoration. Therefore, it is not allowed under NFCC. The image is removed from the article. Johnny Au _{(talk/contributions)} 20:13, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AmFlyer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). I uploaded this photo under my old user name years ago, and see no use for it. Iheartcsx (talk) 21:09, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LC Lake.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). I uploaded this photo under my old user name years ago, and see no use for it. Iheartcsx (talk) 21:15, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LCCarousel.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan - The file is not used on any pages in Wikipedia. Unencyclopedic - The file doesn't seem likely to be useful in this encyclopedia (or for any Wikimedia project). I uploaded this photo under my old user name years ago, and see no use for it. Iheartcsx (talk) 21:22, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dahesh-portrait.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 24 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free portrait painting of a 20th-century figure, used merely to illustrate the subject of the portrait, not the artistic work of the painter. Not the object of commentary as an artwork. Should be replaced with a photograph. FUR fails to address replaceability. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:46, 16 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.