Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 29
April 29
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WFN HD.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Musimax (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Secondary logo of an organization, used together with its primary logo in the same article. Both are so similar the one could easily be described on the basis of the other (it's just the addition of two letters on the right). Thus fails NFCC#8 and #3 Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:00, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete No value added, really. Fails NFCC#8. Sven Manguard Wha? 07:59, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep: I think it adds value to the article. It distinguishes it from the main logo so readers will know that they are different rather than they think it's the same.musimax. (talk) 00:29, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oru Kal Oru Kannadi.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Secret of success (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Alleged movie poster, but uploader states he created it entirely himself; thus not an official poster but inofficial fan-art (though evidently based on some copyrighted photographs). Should not be used as official poster in infobox. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:01, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yep, I'd say fanart. Never seen a movie poster with zero TinEye hits before, and only one that used Comic Sans font. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:20, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept the new version - Peripitus (Talk) 00:21, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Singam Suriya.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Secret of success (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Non-free movie poster falsified through some arbitrary modifications made by uploader. Can't be used as alleged official poster in this form. Delete unless overwritten with cleaned-up original version Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Resolved (Keep) I found an official, unedited, poster at another source and uploaded that poster over the old one. I'll go find an admin to revdel the bad one. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:45, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Deleted and replaced with protected Generic image - Peripitus (Talk) 00:28, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 004.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Stratmoen4477 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Delete and salt (nondescriptive filename). Six completely different images have been uploaded under this filename. We are missing source and licensing information for most of them. The original image is a book cover improperly tagged with {{PD-self}}. —Bkell (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Yeah, I've seen this happen a couple of times. Get rid of it, and as for that filename, get rid of that too. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:48, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Pic998.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Richotting (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
orphaned, unidentified subject, overly generic filename, obviously wrong "own work" claim (though likely PD). Absent uploader. Fut.Perf. ☼ 15:35, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Utterly useless as is. Sven Manguard Wha? 17:49, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:PrayAnything.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Holiday56 (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Hardly passes WP:NFCC #8 CTJF83 17:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Generally useless image, also orphaned fair use. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:09, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete - There is a consensus that it's use in the Cultural-Wikipedia article does not meet the NFC requirements. I did notice that it had a rationale for the Foxtrot article, which lacks an image, but could not quickly see in the history whether it was there or was removed in the past - Peripitus (Talk) 00:37, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Foxtrot wikipedia.png (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nousernamesleft (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Abusive use of non-free comic-strip. The full work is used when a description would be a better fit. Damiens.rf 19:30, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, agree, totally unnecessary non-free image. CTJF83 19:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'd delete substantial portions of that page as listcruft. This image itself really adds nothing substantial. Fails NFCC#1 and NFCC#8. Sven Manguard Wha? 20:03, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, that page is The Mess. But that's a separate issue. --Damiens.rf 20:12, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep That particular comic strip reached tens of millions of people (or more?) and shows the popular impressions of Wikipedia. On a related note, it's why I first checked out WP, so I know for a fact it had at least a small impact (likely larger considering the jump in webhits on WP). It's the sole non-free image (and sole mass-marketed image) and I think it shows the popular perspective of Wikipedia; it can't be replaced by text alone. — BQZip01 — talk 22:42, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Penny Arcade comic-20051216h.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Can't sleep, clown will eat me (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unnecessary use of a full comic strip. Damiens.rf 19:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This image itself really adds nothing substantial. Fails NFCC#1 and NFCC#8. Sven Manguard Wha? 21:19, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Clearly copyrighted and nothing addressed in it isn't already addressed elsewhere. — BQZip01 — talk 22:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hamlet2.jpg (delete | talk | history | links | logs) – uploaded by Nousernamesleft (notify | contribs | uploads | upload log).
Unnecessary non-free image showing a man at work is not really useful to understand his work. Damiens.rf 21:22, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.