Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 April 19

< April 18	April 20 >

April 19

File:Wen Chuen quake parents with photos of children.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not necessary to understand the article. It may be an emotionally moving picture, but it conveys no concrete, factual information that is crucial to the article and couldn't be described through text alone. Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:51, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Image isn't tied to the text with any sourced commentary. There's plenty of other free images on the article which convey the destruction caused by the quake. This image, if it were larger, would be very potent but as Fut.Perf notes, the emotional content of the image isn't conveying anything crucial here that can't be described in text. As is, with the size the image is without the caption it's effectively impossible to understand what is being portrayed. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Weiwei-dsc 0103.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free photograph of an artist standing in front of an exhibition illustrating his political advocacy work. Not needed to understand the text about this work (the display isn't an artwork but simply some papers with lists on them). Fails NFCC#8. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Nothing here that can not be described in text. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

orphaned (location) maps

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - presumably by Skier Dude - Peripitus (Talk) 10:17, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned (location) maps. Low resolution, no further use expected. -- Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete I uploaded at least one of them. They where useful at the time but have no further use as they have been superseeded. In fact I have already deleted some a few years ago. Did not think that many where actually left. Agathoclea (talk) 19:34, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Move all to Commons All the ones that are license compatible should be moved. Not ever wikipedia uses fancy maps that we do with template emplaced points on blank maps. Hardmaps should be available for their use. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:41, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note these or similar maps have already been deleted on commons see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Locator maps of municipalities in Germany and the ones noted here have either been ported to enwiki at the time if still needed here or where orphaned prior to that event when the templates where updated. Other wikis either have copied the template system or long ago copied the relevant locator maps. As a matter of note the maps where generated by some website/software under licence and are always replacable. Also one of the points of the commons deletion was that the base map of these locator maps had errors. Agathoclea (talk) 06:47, 20 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would assume that every other language had articles on these places at the time they were deleted, or even existed as a wiki. Though if commons doesn't want them because of errors, I guess there's no place to put them for use by wikipedias that are growing to encompass Germany. 65.94.45.160 (talk) 05:07, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

As we are talking 4 years ago - there where hardly any - It was the change in template in de-wiki at that time that made a mass-scale import into every other language possible (much to the dismay of German editors who loathed the "substandart" infobox-only articles and started fighting over interwikilinks) and at the same time made these type of maps unneeded. Also no point propagating false drawings. Agathoclea (talk) 05:45, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Spot check shows (a) the images aren't in use and (b) the primary uploader was informed, and has edited since. Seems a non-controversial deletion of superseded work. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Montalcino01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

scanned from somewhere. license questionable. orphaned. Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete uploader long gone, unused, and as CG notes, obviously a scan (as metadata confirms). --Hammersoft (talk) 14:33, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Campanilesanzeno.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "unverified> 7 days" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ChiesaPlestia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "at the request of the Uploader" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chiesasanprocoloverona.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "unverified by June 18" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fonte delle Fate.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "(C14) file to be checked over a week" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gherardo3 formella.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

deleted at it.wp: "(C12) Infringement of copyright: http://www.camino-oderzo.it/dacamino/immagini/gherardo3_formella_piccolo.jpg" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Giancarlo de Carlo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "unverified after 7 days" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LEONIPROTIROsanzenoverona.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "PD without sources" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Licata oggi 6.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "(C12) Infringement of copyright: http://www.montesoleholiday.com/img/mollarella.jpg" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Palazzo di città licata.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by VernoWhitney (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:11, 27 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "(C12) Infringement of copyright: http://www.montesoleholiday.com/img/comune_licata.jpg" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Protirosanzeno.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "PD without sources" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ramsau mit dachsteinmassiv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at de.wp: "For at least 14 days without proper licensing" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RobbioCastle1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "unverified" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rosonesanzeno.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "PD without sources" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:San Geremia Santa Lucia.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "(C14) File to check for more than a week in the debate also shows the following statement: The owner of the rights of Pictures Bon Alexander, withdraw the license" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Staggia Senese.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "Unverified" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Torresanzenodiverona.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at it.wp: "PD doubtful" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Osteotom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted at de.wp: "no valid license" Common Good (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HSV-2 Swift-side.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:09, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned, obsolete (File:HSV-2 Swift232.png) Common Good (talk) 19:38, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.