Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 26

< September 25	September 27 >

September 26

File:Coat of arms of Bijelo Polje.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by png, unused Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 02:40, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete only after the transparency is fixed in the replacement file. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 05:03, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I made the background transparent. Sven Manguard _Talk 07:15, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IPod Touch 4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The non-free media use rationale is not enough. There are many free media in commons:Category:iPod touch. Rx5674 (talk) 03:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, plenty of free images at Commons. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 04:53, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Previous consensus was to retain one fair use image of the newest model. At the time that was File:IPod Touch Late 2009.png; it has been orphaned and will be deleted soon. I suggest we keep this image in its stead. As for free images on Commons, only one depicts the newest model (look for the camera above the screen), and it is essentially a black rectangle. It is necessary to show the software and sides of the unit to gain a full appreciation of the device, the purpose of the infobox image. HereToHelp ^{(talk to me)} 05:09, 29 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As has been said, plenty of free images. Fails NFCC #1. Delete Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UD Vecindario kits 2008-09.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:11, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted image of kit from previous season. No longer has any legitimate value, and will never be used again. Function of the image is replicated in the sidebox which has depictions of kits that do not violate copyright. Sven Manguard _Talk 04:05, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, image is now orphaned. Sven Manguard _Talk 04:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Rehman⁽⁺⁾ 05:04, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CarlDreyer.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 3 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There is a free image of this man at File:Carl Theodor Dreyer (1965) by Erling Mandelmann.jpg. This fair use image is no longer needed. Sandstein 16:12, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I was the original uploader, but if we have a better picture that's free, than by all means. Andrzejbanas (talk) 16:59, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Per uploader. Sven Manguard _Talk 03:13, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Google Chrome logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

superseded by File:Google Chrome wordmark full.png Terrillja _talk 22:43, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Orphaned image, superseded by a transparent and higher quality image. Sven Manguard _Talk 03:10, 27 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Google Sites logo.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

redundant to File:Google Sites logo.png Terrillja _talk 22:37, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yahoo! Mail logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 4 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant to SVG image at File:YahooMailLogo.svg Terrillja _talk 22:20, 26 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Sven Manguard _Talk 04:36, 30 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.