Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 September 16
September 16
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:2dtymw8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Drjimuk (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused image, looks like a band promo/logo image - unsure if uploader is "Author: Jim Kirk". It may have had something to do with JiKay and The Loudest Band. Soundvisions1 (talk) 00:59, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:19, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 115.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shubair (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:Picture 78.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shubair (notify | contribs | uploads)
- File:Picture 130.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shubair (notify | contribs | uploads)
- File:Picture 131.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Shubair (notify | contribs | uploads)
- Unused, inscrutable, low-quality photos. No encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 01:51, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:29, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 302.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Grapeflux (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 02:04, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:30, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 168.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pvtrpandey (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused photo. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 02:06, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The problem is that we do not know the name of the lake. --Leyo 18:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:8promo2.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sydafek (notify | contribs | uploads).
- File:8promo1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sydafek (notify | contribs | uploads)
- File:8 poster.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sydafek (notify | contribs | uploads)
- unused image - same user uploaded two other images - they are all marked "promo". Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:09, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 70.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pavelmore1 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused, low-quality personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 02:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:33, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 72.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Joseph62384 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused, low-quality personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 02:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 171.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Vern32 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused, low-quality personal photo. —Bkell (talk) 02:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:34, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AAE band bros.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jcjacobc (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused promo photo of a band. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:31, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 15:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Hilo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by JeffreyAllen1975 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- It's not Hilo, duplicate file with proper name already made for commons Travis Thurston+ 03:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- and I tried to request a "speedy" delete several times; evidently not using the right procedure? Please get rid of it, since the name blocks the visibility of a "Hilo.jpg" on commons that I would like to use. Thanks. W Nowicki (talk) 04:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I moved the old one to a new name. Everything should be all set now. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:23, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 14:09, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ruslan Biryukov for web.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Maestro@celloart.com (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 09:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I do not fully agree on that. It might however be a copyvio. --Leyo 18:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Photo by Denise Hong. Permission should at least be confirmed through OTRS. Although I'm not sure we need the photo anyway since there's no Ruslan Biryukov article. Jafeluv (talk) 10:34, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AJLC.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jemmima python (notify | contribs | uploads).
- unused, self taken photo. Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:36, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AMG LOGO.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Auburnmusicgroup (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused logo Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ANGELABROWN.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Angela19484181 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused self taken image. Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:42, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:ATMreceipt.GIF (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jcairns78 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused scan of a Bendigo Bank ATM receipt Soundvisions1 (talk) 10:55, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. Jafeluv (talk) 11:39, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:AWWWWWWWWW!.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jakeizzle (notify | contribs | uploads).
- unused self shot image Soundvisions1 (talk) 11:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Seem to never have been in use (see Special:Contributions/Jakeizzle). --Leyo 18:11, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:LSD tautomers and enantiomers.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by John Riemann Soong (notify | contribs | uploads).
- The file contains several errors (see dispute templates on page) and is unused. Leyo 14:03, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Snjsharma.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snjsharma (notify | contribs | uploads).
- orphaned self-photo Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:16, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Jaisinghpur1.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snjsharma (notify | contribs | uploads).
- pretty clearly not self-made; User:Snjsharma uploaded tons of copyvios Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:17, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Fort Nalagarh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snjsharma (notify | contribs | uploads).
- dubious own work - uploader uploaded tons of copyvios. i'd delete as a precautionary measure. Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:19, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rohtang Jot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snjsharma (notify | contribs | uploads).
- dubious self-made, another one from User:Snjsharma Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Man, if u Can find this file somewhere on web, copyrighted than you should list it for deletion, else stop messing with good articles117.198.130.166 (talk) 18:15, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Courcelles (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Urmila Singh.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snjsharma (notify | contribs | uploads).
- extremely dubious self-made, another one from User:Snjsharma Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:24, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:The Railway Board Building, Shimla.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Snjsharma (notify | contribs | uploads).
- dubious self-made, another one from User:Snjsharma Calliopejen1 (talk) 14:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 08:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Masyu.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zotmeister (notify | contribs | uploads).
- deprecated by File:Masyu puzzle.svg Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:01, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The original creator, User:Zotmeister, has asked that this remain on the site. The new version was created by User:Life of Riley, in an unfortunate manner that removed Zotmeister's copyright and released the file into the public domain. I have fixed that on the svg version, but keeping the original around makes a clear claim of copyright.--Mike Selinker (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Zotmeister no longer owns the copyright - he has released it under GFDL. Magog the Ogre (talk) 18:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is just plain wrong; you clearly do not understand the GFDL - or indeed, its very purpose. Releasing this puzzle (and its associated images) under that license did NOT surrender my copyright in any way. What it did do is allow Wikipedia (or any other entity) to use and distribute the puzzle, without seeking my personal permission, despite my copyright. The only real condition to that, as specified - and enforced - by the license, is that my copyright notice remains intact. Ultimately, I don't care whether the puzzle images remain on the site or not, in any form, but I will NOT allow ignorance to steal my rights from me - I composed that puzzle as a good-faith gift, and it can either be used or discarded in reciprocal faith, but NOT stolen. It is for precisely this sort of misconception that I have asked to retain my originals on Wikipedia if derivative versions are to exist here as well - I do not want there to be ANY (further) chance for the attribution path to be broken. - ZM Zotmeister (talk) 04:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Zotmeister is correct. Ownership is never transferred by the GFDL. What is transferred is the right to publish and distribute.--Mike Selinker (talk) 17:19, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That is just plain wrong; you clearly do not understand the GFDL - or indeed, its very purpose. Releasing this puzzle (and its associated images) under that license did NOT surrender my copyright in any way. What it did do is allow Wikipedia (or any other entity) to use and distribute the puzzle, without seeking my personal permission, despite my copyright. The only real condition to that, as specified - and enforced - by the license, is that my copyright notice remains intact. Ultimately, I don't care whether the puzzle images remain on the site or not, in any form, but I will NOT allow ignorance to steal my rights from me - I composed that puzzle as a good-faith gift, and it can either be used or discarded in reciprocal faith, but NOT stolen. It is for precisely this sort of misconception that I have asked to retain my originals on Wikipedia if derivative versions are to exist here as well - I do not want there to be ANY (further) chance for the attribution path to be broken. - ZM Zotmeister (talk) 04:16, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Alright, well he still owns the copyright, which is released under GFDL. I suppose I misused my semantics. In any case, I'm not sure what any of this has to do with anything - proper attribution is now given on commons, and it fits within GFDL. Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:35, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- You brought it up - I was just responding. If it does make a difference, then I wanted to make certain the situation was correctly understood, that's all. I was under the impression that, since the new files list the old ones as the sources, that the originals needed to stick around in order to maintain the proper attribution path. That may well be erroneous, hence why I only asked for the originals to stay; if (and only if) none of my rights are sacrificed by the removal of the PNG files, then I do not object to their deletion. (Your remark VERY much challenged those rights, and in a manner I knew to be false, hence my response.) - ZM Zotmeister (talk) 22:08, 22 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: keep. — ξxplicit 08:07, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MasyuSolution.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Zotmeister (notify | contribs | uploads).
- deprecated by File:Masyu puzzle solution.svg. Magog the Ogre (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. The original creator, User:Zotmeister, has asked that this remain on the site. The new version was created by User:Life of Riley, in an unfortunate manner that removed Zotmeister's copyright and released the file into the public domain. I have fixed that on the svg version, but keeping the original around makes a clear claim of copyright.--Mike Selinker (talk) 17:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bisphenol S.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Soswimmer13 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- JPG with ugly compression artifacts, replaced with File:Bisphenol S.svg. Leyo 15:20, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 553.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mexognosis (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused photo, apparently of Sheldon/Charter Oak in Hartford, Connecticut [1]. I don't think we have enough context to make effective use of this photo. —Bkell (talk) 17:50, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- What about moving the file to Commons (with a more descriptive name)? It could be useful for other wikiprojects. --Leyo 18:07, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I thought about that (and I've been doing that with a bunch of other images), but I don't know what that building is, so I don't know what to rename the image or how to categorize it. The only thing I know about the image is the neighborhood in which it was taken—that's what I mean about not having enough context to make effective use of it. If you think it would be beneficial to move it to the Commons as File:Sheldon-Charter Oak, Hartford, Connecticut.jpg or something, please go ahead. —Bkell (talk) 18:26, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 446.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jaisingh rathore (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused photo. No context for encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 18:22, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 474.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mexognosis (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused photo of a random house on South Whitney Street in the West End of Hartford, Connecticut. If anyone thinks this is a useful photo, it should be moved to the Commons under a better file name. —Bkell (talk) 18:32, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Picture 150.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Yoshi-kazama (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused image. There are two completely unrelated photos here. The original photo is a very low-quality photo of the logo of a football club. The current photo shows a young man with a violin. We have no source or licensing information for the current photo, and no context about it, because the image description page was not updated after the upload. —Bkell (talk) 18:36, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Qasim Multiage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Qasim Sidd 1987 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused screenshot of computer software. —Bkell (talk) 19:10, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 24 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Klee, Angelus novus.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:Klee, Angelus novus.gif listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads).
- orphaned by File:Klee, Angelus novus.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) 21:46, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.