Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 October 31
| < October 30 | November 1 > |
|---|
October 31
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Unused, no conceivable use, appears to be a poor photoshop job Terrillja talk 00:11, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unused, I don't think there's going to be any encyclopedic use for this. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:01, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: close. This discussion is not "keep", "delete" or "no consensus". Through a series of circumstances, there were two separate discussions taking place for this image; one on the October 23 log, which would have probably resulted in keeping the image, and the other on this log page, which initially resulted in delete. As explained on my talk page, there was a huge mess and a larger portion of arguments—specifically, the keep arguments—were unknown and unfairly were not assessed. As requested, I restored the image to undo the mess. This file is still open to another nomination, and the result of this discussion should hold absolutely no weight on any future discussions. — ξxplicit 06:39, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Dale Robertson Racist Sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by CartoonDiablo (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Image was tagged replaceable fair use, but an objection was raised so it may as well be discussed here. Case for replaceable seemed reasonable to me. Stifle's argument for replaceability was: "Replaceable by/redundant to the free textual description in the article. Also probable violation of WP:NFCC#2." That seems right to me too: fails to meet NFCC #1 and #2. Angus McLellan (Talk) 12:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- A case that the image is replaceable by text is not that clear cut. When it is used in an article to illustrate simply that "a man held a sign that said 'yada yada'", then yes, that qualifies as replaceable. However, the article frequently uses that image to illustrate (depending on which version of the article you access) additional content explaining that portions of the sign in the image were photoshopped; forged; obviously faked, etc.; content better conveyed and confirmed by the visual image rather than textual description. The image also does not appear to violate WP:NFCC#2, and isn't used in a manner that replaces the role of the original, as it is just one image from a set of several images that were used in a "forgery analysis" article, and is useless in that capacity as a stand-alone image in a Wikipedia article. Its market value only exists when it is presented as part of the set in conjunction with the other, high-res close-up comparison images used in the source. Xenophrenic (talk) 01:37, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think text conveys anywhere near the context for the story surrounding the issue as usefully as the picture. BigK HeX (talk) 16:09, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the text 'a photo was taken of TeaParty.org founder and president Dale Robertson with a sign that said "Congress = Slaveowner, Taxpayer = Niggar' adequately explains what happened without the need of a non-free image. PhilKnight (talk) 20:50, 30 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:41, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. A text description is sufficient. No need for this non-free image. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
Maps of Illinois townships, part 1
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete all. Right about now is when I wish MediaWiki had a check-box so that the main title and related talk page could be deleted in one click. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:59, 7 November 2010 (UTC) [reply]
The nominated files have been superceded by more detailed maps at Commons (see Category:Maps of Illinois) and are, as a result, currently unused. I proposed here and at Commons (here and here) that they be moved to Commons, but there does not appear to be any interest in getting them—they are, after all, lower-quality versions of content which is already on Commons. A trial nomination (here) to determine whether there is consensus on Wikipedia to delete all similar files ended with a result to delete. To avoid accidentally nominating images which are still in use, I will check and nominate the 1,000+ affected files over the course of multiple nominations. -- Black Falcon (talk) 06:00, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Calliopejen1 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 01:01, 1 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SanjayduttinYerwadajail.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by UtharaMalabar (notify | contribs | uploads).
- clear copyright violation of http://health.rediff.com/news/2007/oct/22verdict.htm ;all others created entirely by myself would appear to suffer from the same little problem Crusoe8181 (talk) 06:55, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Winme beta 18.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Fuzzy510 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unecessary non-free image. Removing this image wouldn't meaningfully affect the educational value of the article. PhilKnight (talk) 14:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:11, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Num0042 - 15-04-04.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by El3 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Un-encyclopedic, low quality, unused image bobbo (talk) 16:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Unencyclopedic, unused personal photo. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:53, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bosilegradloc.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Raskoyu (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, superseded by File:Serbia Bosilegrad.png Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:28, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Orphaned. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:54, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:SBHC Pyramid8.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Jhardy (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, target article System-based healthcare deleted Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bistar potok.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Stefanmg (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic (no way to determine where this is) Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:31, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 20:37, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Wow, kolika šapa!.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Stefanmg (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:32, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Orphaned, unencyclopedic. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 20:38, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Miguel Lyobet.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Da Vynci (notify | contribs | uploads).
- There is no evidence this image is free - it lacks an author and there is no information on the source page on who took the photo and when and whether the image was published pre-1923. Hekerui (talk) 19:19, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Walmart complete.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Walmartfan (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Low quality, unused in article space. Angus McLellan (Talk) 21:09, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Transwiki to commons license appears compatible, and it would seem likely that some other Wikipedia may feature several different versions of the Wal-Mart storefront. 76.66.203.138 (talk) 05:38, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. While it may qualify for inclusion on Commons, let's skip this one, since the quality is horrendous. SchuminWeb (Talk) 03:13, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This one [1] is better quality than this one up for deletion and is the same logo. No need to keep this one here or on Commons. Msw1002 (talk) 23:07, 7 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
![[1]](/wiki/File:Old_walmart_logo.gif){kind=link}
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WikiProjectMetalocalypse.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Pmcginty (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused image, used from the WikiProject Metalocalypse banner which is now deleted. JJ98 (Talk) 21:21, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:50, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Denmark street sign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mask0304 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:52, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:02, 8 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Ghost Tamerz 014.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by GhostTamerz (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned, Unencyclopedic Calliopejen1 (talk) 22:53, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Orphaned and totally unencyclopedic. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 (Contact) 10:55, 6 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.