Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 October 20

< October 19	October 21 >

October 20

File:AIDS.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image. If editors feel there is a use for this "poster" than {{mtc}}, if not delete. Soundvisions1 (talk) 01:54, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AIS.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of a school sign. Appears to have been shot through a foggy lens or a foggy window. Soundvisions1 (talk) 02:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Unused school sign image, no need. DARTH SIDIOUS 2 ^(Contact) 14:02, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AK 47 IN GUYANA.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. I am also fairly certain this was deleted under a different name, perhaps upped by a different user. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AK P.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image - consists of text only and called "A story about a couple" Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:03, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AK-Title4site.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: file speedy-deleted as promotional. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:33, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image. Spam banner "advertising" a website. Summary lists the website and tell people to "visit and sign your organ donor card". The uploaders User page is basically the same thing. No other contributions since 2006. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:10, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AK000166.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AKI-sign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of a signature. Of whose is not clear as there is no summary given and the image name is a bit vague. Is "AKI" also the uploader, "Abaliwala"? Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fisher.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The current image is unused and its upload summary said "teacher". It was upped over this image. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AKarolyi12.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image. Appears to be a teacher teaching. Based on the image name "A Karolyi"? No summary given. Soundvisions1 (talk) 03:49, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AL212.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal myspacey-hand-held-self photo. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:01, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ALPHAPLEDGES.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal image. Frat party/pledges posing Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:20, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ALTO-STOP.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused, low rez/small (166 × 126) image of a stop sign in Mexico Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:37, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ALU Bigflag.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused image of a really big flag. From the the name if the image I am guessing it is the ALU big flag. No summary, so no real description. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ALB1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image licensed "For Wikipedia use" which should have been speedied via F3 however it was declined because it does not use the word "only". This image clearly states "for use on Wikipedia." and it is unused, most likely orphaned from the deletion of A Little Bitter article on July 28, 2008. There is no doubt this was licensed "for use on Wikipedia", and there is no doubt there was "permission" for it's use in the A Little Bitter article. Soundvisions1 (talk) 04:55, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
'Procedural keep' - this image should be deleted, but only after {{subst:npd}} or WP:FFD. "Created for use on Wikipedia" + PD-self => uploader created the image for use on Wikipedia, and released it into the public domain in order to comply. There is no contradiction or violation of copyright terms here. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Strike that, this is FFD, not PUF. Delete as orphaned and unnecessary, and a possible copyvio via npd, without prejudice to recreation with valid permission information and an article. Magog the Ogre (talk) 06:47, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The SpongeBob SquarePants Movie.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No evidence this wasn't copy and pasted together by some one, as you can't see what blogspot it came from...not sure which SD applies CTJF83 chat 06:12, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Question are you saying it's WP:OR or WP:COPYVIO? If the latter, the image does have an apparently valid FUR. If the former, no SD applies. --N Y Kevin @893, i.e. 20:25, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cameron Tyler Bass Guitar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:05, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

a image i put upa while ago and i realised that i have no need of the image please delete this image thank you. Cameron E. Tyler (talk) 07:15, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Try an WP:G7 tag CTJF83 chat 07:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First intifada.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are a couple isues with this. 1) It is a nonfree image that says Indymedia is the source. Indymedia began in 1999 while this is an image dated "1987-1992". There is no attribution to the original author and we don't even know the actual date which presents multiple issues. 2)The FUR has been disputed since there are contextual significance issues. The FUR for First Intifada says that it "It is used here strictly for informative purposes" and that "Use of the image adds significantly to the article". This has been disputed since it as used to identify the subject instead of illustrating critical commentary. A picture of a youth throwing a stone does not necessarily require illustration and it does not define the First Intifada. No FUR is provided for History of the Israeli–Palestinian conflict. Cptnono (talk) 08:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DIMBOA-ball-and-stick.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:44, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned/replaced image (has been replaced by a better version of the same uploader by him-/herself). Leyo 11:24, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jack Styles on Studio.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Lacking source description; only encyclopedic usage was on user's subpage.

File:Jack Styles smashing up yo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

File:Jack Styles on the line.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs)

Delete Kill it with fire. The images, and the user subpage. WP:NOTMYSPACE Andy Dingley (talk) 21:30, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Albuterol rx.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: deletion. It is wrong and has been replaced. -- Ed (Edgar181) 12:38, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Error in reaction scheme - The LiAlH4 also takes down the ester group to the alcohol - thus the final structure should be Salbutamol. Also, this drawing had bond lengths too long. Scheme has been re-drawn using settings as Wikipedia:Manual of Style (chemistry)/Structure drawing , and is now available as File:SalbutRxn.svg Ronhjones ^(Talk) 19:30, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CatsOriginalLondonCast.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. SchuminWeb (Talk) 22:39, 27 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Decorative fair use image, does not add appreciably to readers' understanding of the article (and certainly not any more than an image of any Cats cast would). Stifle (talk) 20:18, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Firstly I'd note that it's the only cast photo in the article. Mostly though, an image of the original cast surely has some encyclopedic merit. Andy Dingley (talk) 21:29, 22 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Andy's right; being the first ever cast during their specifically illustrates aesthetics of the original production in a way that text cannot.oknazevad (talk) 20:39, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goula.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 00:00, 28 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: for whatever reason, the uploader has uploaded a useless orphaned image over his previous upload that will most likely never be used. ww2censor (talk) 22:52, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.