Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 7

< March 6	March 8 >

March 7

File:Blog section on ABC.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Only used in the infobox of the BuddyTV article with the ad-like caption "BuddyTV is recognized by ABC". If an image is to be used in the BuddyTV article, it should be an image of BuddyTV itself. liquidluck✽talk 00:23, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:Fair use "An image of a ... publication that contains long legible sections of copyrighted text. If the text is important as a source or quotation (Which it is not, It does seem like a publicity stunt or something), it should be worked into the article in text form with the article cited as a source. The only fair use image that belongs on that page is Buddy TV's Logo. --Fiftytwo thirty (talk) 22:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seattleu.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:16, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete, replaced by 60px
Delete, useless because of the larger image. Nyttend (talk) 06:09, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Everyone says i love you.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Graeme Bartlett (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:08, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image is of low quality, it has been replaced with the higher quality image File:Everyone says i love you DVD.jpg Cocoaguy ここがいい_contribs^talk 00:33, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep this image, Delete other image: low resolution is important with nonfree images such as these. Nyttend (talk) 06:10, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:DKM.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 10:17, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unused personal photo. No context provided to establish notability or an encyclopedic use. —Bkell (talk) 03:22, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless. Nyttend (talk) 16:21, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TibetanFlag.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:25, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant, less detailed version of File:Flag of Tibet.svg. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 04:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, the file on Commons makes this one useless. Nyttend (talk) 06:08, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Animated Fight.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, but I really don't see any encyclopedic purpose to an animation of a stick figure getting kicked in the crotch. Zetawoof_(ζ) 06:27, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete While this is potentially useful (it was added to the GIF article shortly after upload), it's not as useful as other images on that page; consequently, this has been superseded. Nyttend (talk) 16:23, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:16Insurgency01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incomplete source information renders the PD status unverifiable. User had problems with sources before. Damiens.rf 19:02, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:02, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:26-09-2006 22-01-38 0035.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:21, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:21, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:41, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:530569934203 0 ALB.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 23:25, 2 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:52, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:655GG3BageyNash.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 13:23, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 04:32, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 12:55, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:6ug facade.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 19:34, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:6ug facade.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by 6UG (notify | contribs).

OR, UE, LQ, use not stated. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 10:03, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Admin comment: Due to what seems to be a bug in Twinkle, this listing had been removed from its proper place. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:11, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dylan 2009.jpg.ext

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Image does not exist. If the file name in the header contains a typo, feel free to correct the typo and un-close this discussion. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:10, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan Freddie1988 (talk) 18:57, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chinese Division Table.png

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 April 13.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: kept. File was in use in Soroban when I closed this so evidently not yet replaced by markup. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:36, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete and replaced by wikitext table on Suanpan and Soroban Chrismiceli (talk) 19:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. -FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 00:51, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Transwiki to Commons. License is compatible, and it seems potentially useful, especially since it contains material that may be hard or impossible to type elsewhere. 70.29.210.242 (talk) 06:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete easy to recreate as already seen at pages linked above. Poor quality: pixelated, too large and odd choice of colours. No use to other wikis as is in English.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 10:05, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons — it can be modified if necessary. Sites such as the English Wiktionary and the English Wikinews would be surprised to know that its use of English would make it useless for them. Nyttend (talk) 16:20, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

comment I cannot imagine how it would be used in a news article or a dictionary entry, especially given the much better text versions available above.--JohnBlackburne^words_deeds 17:00, 17 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - sister projects can also use the wikitext. PhilKnight (talk) 11:47, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:281675083133 0 BG.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. In use. Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:38, 28 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 21:32, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Why not add it to the relevant article?--Shantavira|^{feed me} 18:05, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - even if the article is merged, the photograph could still be used. PhilKnight (talk) 11:43, 22 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Masturbation Defintion from 1949 Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

My first attempt at an image upload... and it's sideways. I thought the 90° rotation went away when the image viewing application showed it properly, but evidently not. There may be other issues, but if it checks out otherwise, it could be recreated as another file in its proper orientation and added to Masturbation#In_history_and_society as I intended to. (It is of fairly historical significance for that article.) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Y. Mousley (talk • contribs) 22:14, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.