Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 March 4
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
March 4
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:3strikesseason37.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Kyle C Haight (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned image from deleted article. Sottolacqua (talk) 00:16, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:03, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:3Strikes+.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by TKH Mebo (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned image from deleted article. Sottolacqua (talk) 00:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BrainPOPtim.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sacularamacal13 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Appears to be a screenshot. Definitely not PD. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:37, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This image is one of two primary images for the article BrainPOP. The subject of the image is one of the two main characters of the website BrainPOP.com and appears next to extensive discussion of the character illustrated. How do we know that the uploader did not have the right to release the image? If not, a fair use rationale should be added here. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Our assumption is, and must be, that images are not free until we receive evidence that they are. If someone adds a valid fair use rationale (which would have to include the source and preferably the copyright holder) before the closure of this debate, it can be kept. Stifle (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Seresin (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Moby.png (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Sacularamacal13 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unnecessary fairuse. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:45, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. This image is one of two primary images for the article BrainPOP. The subject of the image is one of the two main characters of the website BrainPOP.com and appears next to extensive discussion of the character illustrated. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:21, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete unless a full and proper fair use rationale is added. Stifle (talk) 17:40, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Bob from brainpop.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SnowKid32 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Low quality, unneeded character pic. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep The licensing can be changed to fair use since it looks useful for this wikipedia article which focuses on children. --Artene50 (talk) 10:12, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fails NFCC.8 as it is not necessary for readers to understand the subject. ÷seresin 00:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Addie From BPOP.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by SnowKid32 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Screenshot, definitely not pd-author. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:46, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Seconded that license is wrong, however it seems that the image falls under "fair use". Laudak (talk) 05:12, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Fails NFCC.8 as it is not necessary for readers to understand the subject. ÷seresin 00:16, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Zscout370 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Doesn't seem to be of help to the project. Although generally user images are allowed, the user has admitted to being 11, and it is only in gallery section of user's userpage, and he said what school he's going to. Plus he's announced retirement. In short, it is a personal image that is not being used for a personal use, and is of no other benefit to the project, in addition to being a possible privacy risk. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 04:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Something wrong in the nomination logic: "it is only in gallery section of user's userpag" vs. "not being used for a personal use". I'd say keep. Plenty of wikipedians have their visages, retired or not.Laudak (talk) 05:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Lenin 1887.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by GrahamColm (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Unused photoshopped or retouched clip from full photo in Commons File:Lenin-circa-1887.jpg. Laudak (talk) 05:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:KennedyCrest.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Operaguy (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Obsolete; Superseded by File:JFKCHS GS Logo.png Aricci526 10:55, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TB Irving.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Schrei (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Source is copyrighted Vssun (talk) 11:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, no evidence for PD tag. Nyttend (talk) 06:15, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: speedy keep; bad-faith nomination by sockpuppet. PeterSymonds (talk) 16:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:TiananmennBrutality.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Dilip rajeev (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Delete The site provided is not a reliable source/the file is clearly non neutral and could be replace by a better image ConfuciusInstitute (talk) 11:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Primary Source. And "ConfuciusInstitute" is, interestingly, the name of a CCP propaganda wing. There is nothing "non-neutral" about the photographs, and is material from a primary source.Dilip rajeev (talk) 04:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment "Reliability" doesn't weigh into image deletion decisions, images are generally only deleted if they violate copyright (which this does not appear to, unless Clearwisdom itself does not hold copyright to the 4 images that make it up) or are unencyclopedic. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 16:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT⚡ 17:11, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:26391 339445641477 572511477 4222721 1717069 n.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Mortlake2010 (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned image for an article that was speedy deleted Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 17:08, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 06:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Oklahoma State Highway 57.svg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Devillion (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Uploaded by a permabanned user, who created it only to use in a hoax article. The real SH-57 hasn't existed since the 1950s and this shield wasn't introduced until 2006. (SH-57 would have been signed with either a white diamond or a white square.) —Scott5114↗ [EXACT CHANGE ONLY] 18:23, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, what you say means that this is essentially a hoax image. Nyttend (talk) 06:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT⚡ 06:37, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:French colonial Empire.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by [[User talk:#File:French colonial Empire.PNG listed for deletion|]] ([ notify] | contribs | uploads).
- Extremely inaccurate image: missing losts of New France in the eastern USA and Upper Canada and also including northern Quebec which was actually never under French control due to British arrival).
(I am not the nominator of this image deletion but merely carrying it out responciably and appropriately as the nominator did not do so.) Vadac (talk) 18:54, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Addemup.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) – uploaded by Wikider (notify | contribs | uploads).
- Orphaned image from recently deleted article. Sottolacqua (talk) 23:17, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.