Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 June 26

< June 25	June 27 >

June 26

File:Fort Totten Upper Level.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, plus pylon blocking much of the shot. SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A properly licenced image should not be deleted just because it is orphaned. This image could easily be made more useful by cropping and could also moved to the commons. ww2censor (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTREPOSITORY. If it were of sufficient quality to be worth moving to Commons, I would have done so. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File is no worse that what is in Commons:Category:Fort Totten (Washington Metro) so I see not reason not to move to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 22:16, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prince Georges Plaza.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality (dirty lens). SchuminWeb (Talk) 02:53, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It is similar to File:Prince George's Plaza station 2.jpg and there is not much else to choose from in Commons:Category:Prince George's Plaza (Washington Metro) so I see no reason not to move to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 22:19, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:QQlogo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned logo, no longer in use antilived^{T | C | G} 05:59, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HighSchoolCrest.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No FUR. Dubious copyright holder - who is the creator? Kudpung (talk) 12:41, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Silver Spring.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:09, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A properly licenced image should not be deleted just because it is orphaned. It could easily be of use in Silver Spring, Maryland or Silver Spring (Washington Metro) and could be moved to the commons. ww2censor (talk) 13:44, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:NOTREPOSITORY. If it were of sufficient quality to be worth moving to Commons, I would have done so. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:59, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The image is just as good (or better) than what is in Commons:Category:Silver Spring (Washington Metro) so I se no reason not to move it to Commons. --MGA73 (talk) 22:13, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Uniform polyhedron-52-t0.bmp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 09:04, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

These 6 images:

Might be a copyvio of the program they are created with. They are unused (except in userspace) anyway and they are bmp which should be avoided. It should be possible to find replacements on Commons. MGA73 (talk) 18:38, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Aha! http://geometrygames.org/KaleidoTile/index.html says "License Freeware (GNU General Public License)" so copyright is not the most relevant reason to delete. But it is still unused and a bmp. Sorry for starting this DR with unclear arguments. --MGA73 (talk) 18:49, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I've created tiling/polyhedra for wikipedia images from KaleidoTile for articles. User:4 apparently uploaded these for reference on his own user page. Tom Ruen (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Convert to png and move to commons then. 76.66.195.196 (talk) 04:58, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hill and Mariah.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:10, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS was received in February 2010 and permission was found to be insufficient Hekerui (talk) 18:57, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete It's been copied to commons and OTRS can be follow-up on just as easily there as here. VernoWhitney (talk) 15:34, 1 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AcoHardwarelogo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 4 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 19:06, 26 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but orphaned non-free images don't need to be nominated here. Hekerui (talk) 13:51, 28 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed. I realized my mistake soon after I made it, but decided not to correct it because this process would end up at the same result as the correct one. SchuminWeb (Talk) 20:01, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.