Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 January 7

< January 6	January 8 >

January 7

File:General Wayne Inn 1953.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:General Wayne Inn 1953.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Weatherdude (notify | contribs).

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Real time race logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Real time race logo.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pdunce (notify | contribs).

orhpaned user-created logo; no source or metadata; no target article Skier Dude (talk) 05:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:E.Rodrigues Smith.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 10:53, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:E.Rodrigues Smith.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is a work if an U.S. Army soldier or employee (anyone can take pictures of Military people). The image was downloaded from a random website that happens to use it. Since the subject was a soldier, it shouldn't be hard to find (well sourced and attributed) public domain pictures of him. Damiens.rf 18:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - source is really http://www.history.army.mil/html/topics/apam/ap-moh2.html - Peripitus (Talk) 03:01, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Good work again! Image can be kept now. --Damiens.rf 11:45, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Guy Gabaldon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep - consensus is that this is indeed in the public domain. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 02:47, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guy Gabaldon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is a work if an U.S. Army soldier or employee (anyone can take pictures of Military people). The image was downloaded from a random website that happens to use it. Since the subject was a soldier, it shouldn't be hard to find (well sourced and attributed) public domain pictures of him. Damiens.rf 18:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The webpage contains many pictures, and the attribution line: "Photos courtesy of the United States Signal Corps, the United States Marine Corps and Guy Gabaldon". Unfortunately, it does not tell us which ones are from the USSC and the USMC (that would be PD) and which ones are from Guy Gabaldon (which would no be PD). --Damiens.rf 18:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - don't know the real source for this image or whether the licence is correct. But in case I have found a free image of him, uploaded to commons, and replaced in all uses here. I like the replacement better as it shows him with Japanese POWs, which is what he is well known for - Peripitus (Talk) 00:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Great. As I said, it's not that hard to find well sourced PD images of US soldiers. --Damiens.rf 01:50, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Unfortunatelly, the source "somosprimos.com" is not that reliable. It's a homage website made by people not too competent on copyright issues... --Damiens.rf 01:52, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
    - True - but as it is a shot that appears taken inside a POW camp, I cannot see it having been taken by anyone other than a military photographer - Peripitus (Talk) 03:59, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
      - It could have been some news worker. Also, one can't even really tell it's a POW camp from the picture. --Damiens.rf 06:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Image also found in "Hell is Upon Us: D-Day in the Pacific-Saipan to Guam". Tony the Marine (talk) 20:34, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: in what way does this piece of information substantiate the claim that the image is PD-USGov? Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:54, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RDavila.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep per consensus, nomination retracted. Fut.Perf. ☼ 19:56, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:RDavila.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

Image was not found on source url. Even if it was, there's no special reason to believe this image was the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (just because it shows an U.S. Army soldier or employee?) Damiens.rf 18:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I can see the same image on http://www.army.mil/asianpacificsoldiers/moh/ww2/davila.html where there is no indication that it is other than a US military photo - Peripitus (Talk) 00:54, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Good source. The image can be kept now! --Damiens.rf 01:53, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lynne Chandler.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Wrong forum. The file is on Commons, please nominate it for deletion there if you still feel it should be deleted. AnomieBOT ⚡ 19:09, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lynne Chandler.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Pgchandler (notify | contribs).

Orphan Pgchandler (talk) 18:38, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beniciodeltoro-oscar.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beniciodeltoro-oscar.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Thief12 (notify | contribs).

Decorative screenshot. Damiens.rf 18:56, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carlos Ortiz Longo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - Peripitus (Talk) 11:01, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carlos Ortiz Longo.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

Image not found on source. Damiens.rf 19:02, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep That NASA rearranged their site isn't a reason to delete a free image. Hobit (talk) 20:29, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I could not find any pictures of this man in a nasa-google search. I have been succesful in other cases. --Damiens.rf 01:56, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - I found one that claimed in was in the picture, but I couldn't find that one either (or on the wayback machine) but I assumed that was NASA. He's certainly part of NASA, but no pictures could I find. If that's not normal, then I guess we have to assume the info was bogus to begin with. Hobit (talk) 03:30, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per WP:AGF. Rettetast (talk) 17:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't get it. --Damiens.rf 19:18, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. 2005 is really long ago; the webpage being changed is very likely. We assume good faith unless there is evidence to suggest otherwise. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:28, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Mistakenly tagging an image involves no bad faith, and is a valid scenario here. Correctly source PD images of NASA people are too easy to get for us to have to rely on problematic images like this. --Damiens.rf 20:43, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Again, you are arguing to the letter of the law. My invocation of AGF was to this end: The image was on the website when he posted it. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:04, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:EMuniz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, but lodge an OTRS ticket if there are concerns here, it can be undeleted. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 00:00, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:EMuniz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

Poorly documented rights release shows the "releaser" didn't even understand what the GFDL is. Source should be verifiable (or documented on OTRS) Damiens.rf 19:08, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
keep – e-mail license posted by an established trustworthy editor should be accepted in good faith, and the terminological confusion between "public domain" and "available for free use" is immaterial as long as the intention is clear. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:00, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- OTRS should be used. Although an otherwise excellent editor, Marine more than ofter gets confused about the use of images, licensing stuff, policy, and other more grave concerns. He is not "trustworthy" in dealing with image licensing (and I mean no disrespect with that. Good faith mistakes assumed). Also, regardless of that, I don't think we should never give some users special treatment. --Damiens.rf 19:23, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am inclined to agree with Damiens. We AGF until we have reason to believe otherwise. Given Tony's other uploads, and his apparent problems with licensing, I am wary of his ability to correctly license an image; that no fewer than three license scenarios are listed on the page does not boost my confidence. I am also a bit unsure why Muniz owns the rights to a clearly posed picture of himself; I think it's pretty certain he did not take the photograph. So I'm going to recommend deletion until/unless OTRS can confirm who owns this image and under what license they release it. ÷seresin 04:19, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, and everybody is capable of good faith mistakes. --Damiens.rf 20:05, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fermín Tangüis.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep - book was published in 1920, which is the only concern raised here. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 02:49, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fermín Tangüis.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

Image not found on urls provided as source. No evidence the author died more than 100 years ago or that this image was first published before 1923. There should exist many books using well-attributed pictures of this famous man. Most of the will be PD due to age. There's no need to use a image found on some website. Damiens.rf 19:11, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Source of image taken in 1920 provided, plus proper change of License tag. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: is there evidence as to publication before 1923, rather than just creation? I'm afraid Damiens is right in insisting on that point. Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:03, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - That is what the caption in the book says "Fermin Tanguis, 1920". Tony the Marine (talk) 00:15, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GarciaMarcario bw.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:GarciaMarcario bw.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ERcheck (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image was just downloaded from some homage website. There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:27, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Herrara.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herrara.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image was just downloaded from some homage website. There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Joe Martinez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Joe Martinez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image was just downloaded from some funny gallery. There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:28, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Manuel Perez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: no consensus, leaning to keep. It looks likely to be a PD image, but there is still some uncertainty. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 02:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Manuel Perez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image can not be found on the source url (that is a site that is not much worried about attribution). There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Breuer, William B "Geronimo! American Paratroopers in WWII"; page 304; New York: St. Martin Press, 1989 621 p. ISBN: 0-312-03350-8 sourced. Tony the Marine (talk) 20:24, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Question: does that source substantiate the claim the image is PD-USGov? Fut.Perf. ☼ 20:04, 10 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
From what I can tell the unit, whose insigia he seems to be wearing, was activated in 1943 and died in service in 1945, reaching that rank of PFC. This is a posed studio photo - with that characteristic left-shoulder-forward and look-to-camera pose—of the same form as many military portraits of the time. I can find no reason that this image would be anything other than a US military photo. The only other thing it could be, I think, is a family shot taken between Jan 1943 and May 1944 (when the unit departed the US) - Peripitus (Talk) 02:44, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Your analysis contains helpful information, but it's generally not a good idea to try to determine the copyright status based on the picture contents. This mistake is already widespread here on wiki by the false belief that any picture of someone dead before 1923 will be PD (when the date of first publication and not the date of creation is what matters). --Damiens.rf 12:57, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hence the lack of a boldfaced "keep" bit in my comments - I am sureish but not sure - Peripitus (Talk) 20:59, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Alejandro Ruiz.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 02:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alejandro Ruiz.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image can not be found on the source url (that is a site that is not much worried about attribution). There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:30, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I am tempted to say Keep here. The image is a reversed crop of this which is him receiving his Medal of Honor from President Truman, which is itself a crop (at higher resolution) of this image. I think the attribution as a US military photo is most likely correct (unless someone has proof that press photographers attended ?) - Peripitus (Talk) 03:29, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jose M lopez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jose M lopez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image can not be found on the source url (that is a site that is not much worried about attribution). There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:31, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ysmael Villegas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep: source has been found. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 02:57, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ysmael Villegas.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image can not be found on the source url (that is a site that is not much worried about attribution). There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:32, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - according to http://www.32nd-division.org/history/moh/32moh.html the "Photo [is] from The 32nd Infantry

Division in World War II". According to their "about" section the website seems reputable and legitimate for claiming such a thing - Peripitus (Talk) 01:41, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sgt Freddy Gonzalez.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy keep: source has been found. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 02:58, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sgt Freddy Gonzalez.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ChuchoHuff (notify | contribs).

Not found on source. Damiens.rf 19:33, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I can see it at http://www.gonzalez.navy.mil/default.aspx. Where the exact one is I can't tell as they've reorganised the site. Licence seems correct - Peripitus (Talk) 01:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note that the image is visible in the webarchive at the original location here - Peripitus (Talk) 01:43, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maximo Yabes.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maximo Yabes.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image was just downloaded from a funny gallery. There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:34, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potriat of E.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Concerns about source and whether it is a copyright issue. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 03:23, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Potriat of E.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

Picture of a painting. The copyright belongs to the painter (that is not attributed). Damiens.rf 19:36, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant Delete. This may be a govt commissioned painting but I cannot tell. According to this it was created by either Puerto Rican painter Jose Galarza or Cuban born artist Zoila E. Diaz. On balance this appears to be a derivative work and falls into one of the unacceptable uses listed in WP:NFC - Peripitus (Talk) 01:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Antonio de los Reyes Correa.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antonio de los Reyes Correa.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this drawing was made before 1923. The source is just a link to a free web-hosting site (50megs.com). Damiens.rf 19:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:J Otero jpg.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Kept - seems that the licence is correct and the image is free Peripitus (Talk) 11:04, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:J Otero jpg.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Marine 69-71 (notify | contribs).

No evidence this is the work of a U.S. Army soldier or employee (not every picture of military people is taken by military people). The image was just downloaded from a commercial website. There should be real PD images of this soldier around. Damiens.rf 19:40, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I just found the proper source which credits the image as a work of the United States Army. I updated the file with the proper information: Hispanic Military Heroes"; Author: Virgil Fernandez; Pj. 105; Publisher: Vfj Publishing; ISBN: 9780967587615. Tony the Marine (talk) 21:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luis Muñoz Marín.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete, consensus is that this should be replacable by a free alternative. - Tbsdy (formerly Ta bu shi da yu) ^talk 03:34, 31 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luis Muñoz Marín.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Agüeybaná (notify | contribs).

Non-free image downloaded from a website that does not attributes the creator or copyright holder, neither claims copyright. We know nothing about this image. We can't simply claim fair use just because we would benefit from using an image. Damiens.rf 19:42, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the image is a press image and is (c) Bettman/Corbis. He was sufficiently photographed that a free image could be obtained - fails NFCC#1 - Peripitus (Talk) 01:03, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: As the first democratically elected governor of the island he was photographed by the local and international press but I have been unable to find a free alternative. You would think that the US fair use doctrine was more clear about the use of a historical person's image, such as that of Luis Muñoz Marín. --Jmundo (talk) 00:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- As far as I know, there's no special treatment on fair use doctrine about pictures of historical figures. --Damiens.rf 14:50, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luis Munoz Marin on Time Magazine cover.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luis Munoz Marin on Time Magazine cover.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JRGBruno (notify | contribs).

Decorative use of a magazine cover. Damiens.rf 19:43, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Luis Muñoz Marín Raising PR Flag.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Luis Muñoz Marín Raising PR Flag.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by JRGBruno (notify | contribs).

Decorative non-free image showing an important event that can be fairly understood without the aid of this particular image. Damiens.rf 19:44, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, doesn't markedly help the reader's understanding, and thus can't pass the nonfree content criteria. Nyttend (talk) 18:06, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:LuisAFerre.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:15, 22 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:LuisAFerre.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Coburnpharr04 (notify | contribs).

Non-free image not found on source. We know nothing about this image's copyright status or author. We can't claim fair use just because we need an image. The subject was a politician and there should be some pictures of him taken by some U.S. government worker. Damiens.rf 19:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rhc.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhc.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Coburnpharr04 (notify | contribs).

Non-free picture of a living guy, not found on source, used on 4 articles. Damiens.rf 19:48, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chris Paul Neil.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chris Paul Neil.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Mollie White (notify | contribs).

Procedural relisting; was incorrectly listed at AfD. Original nomination is below. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 22:37, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Picture was added to a controversial biography and has been removed as a BLP protection, editors say that it has happened previousely, the picture appears not to be the person it is claimed to be. Off2riorob (talk) 22:19, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag of Eastland.pdf

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:04, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Flag of Eastland.pdf (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by ProcEnforce (notify | contribs).

Obsolete. It was used in a hoax article Principality of Eastland Polargeo (talk) 00:10, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Obvious delete. UE, OR, etc. — Andrwsc (talk · contribs) 00:17, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as OR, UE and hoax.--Yopie (talk) 10:25, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.