Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 February 20

< February 19	February 21 >

February 20

File:Mariahcareyh a t e u s i n g l e c o v e r -2mil-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:04, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image is an orphan and not being used by any article. From what I understand reading user's (currently banned) talk page, this image isn't even the cover of the single. Image would therefore be in violation of fair use policy. Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Detail As posted on Detty2.0's talk page regarding this very image of the H.A.T.E.U. cover: Those covers off Ebay were fake. The song had no official artwork which means no artwork should be uploaded to Wikipedia. The promo CD was released as JUST A CD with H.A.T.E.U. and the tracklist written on it. No case, no art. Here's what it looked like. Jayy008 (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Note, the above additional detail was posted by me, Keraunoscopia, not by Jayy008.~~ – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retracting nomination; image was tagged {{dl-orphaned free use}} �– Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 09:02, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:J.lololafreshout.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 21:05, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Image is an orphan and no longer being used by the article, which has its own professional-looking image of the cover.~~ Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:33, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retracting nomination; image was tagged {{di-orphaned free use}} �– Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 09:03, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mariahcareyh.a.t.e.u.s.i.n.g.l.e.c.o.v.e.r.-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Image is an orphan and not being used by any article. In addition, image is a fake that violates copyright policy. Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:35, 20 February 2010 (UTC)~~[reply]

Additional detail As posted on Detty2.0's talk page regarding this very image of the H.A.T.E.U. cover: Those covers off Ebay were fake. The song had no official artwork which means no artwork should be uploaded to Wikipedia. The promo CD was released as JUST A CD with H.A.T.E.U. and the tracklist written on it. No case, no art. Here's what it looked like. Jayy008 (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Note, the above additional detail was posted by me, Keraunoscopia, not by Jayy008.~~ – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retracting nomination; replaced image with {{di-orphaned fair use}} – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 08:59, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mimihothate-1-.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:00, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This image is orphaned and not being used by any article. The image is also an upload of similar images uploaded by the same user (currently banned for copyright infringement). Additionally, this image is purportedly a fake as sold on eBay. Please see additional details and clarification below. Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:40, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional Detail As posted on Detty2.0's talk page regarding this very image of the H.A.T.E.U. cover: Those covers off Ebay were fake. The song had no official artwork which means no artwork should be uploaded to Wikipedia. The promo CD was released as JUST A CD with H.A.T.E.U. and the tracklist written on it. No case, no art. Here's what it looked like. Jayy008 (talk) 17:22, 1 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

~~Note, the above additional detail was posted by me, Keraunoscopia, not by Jayy008.~~ – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 00:37, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retracting nomination for deletion; I'm just using the {{di-orphaned}} template instead. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 08:56, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AtheistCon-CD.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

copyvio Shizhao (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AfrikaBambaataa&theSoulsonicForcePlanetRocktheAlbum.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use image not in use Krinkle (talk) 01:56, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ivans childhood3.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use image not in use Krinkle (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Southpark ep106 2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use image not in use Krinkle (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ezlaptop may09 05.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use image not in use Krinkle (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Miguel Krasnoff.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Orphaned image deletion bot (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:01, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair-use image not in use Krinkle (talk) 02:03, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cher - Rescue Me.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Adds nothing to readers' understanding of topic. Song's content isn't discussed in article. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article sais Cher recorded it for her Dark Lady album and then released it as a promo song. 06:54, 20 February 2010 (UTC)
Delete. WP:NFCC#10c. Rettetast (talk) 22:08, 27 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lohithadas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No source Vssun (talk) 06:50, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nibblesfat.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Melesse (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 07:02, 1 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No FUR+ high resolution Vssun (talk) 07:17, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - A ~~file~~ picture being too high resolution is not a valid reason for deletion at FFD.--Rockfang (talk) 08:13, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PDVD 038.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. PhilKnight (talk) 13:07, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

high resolution Vssun (talk) 07:24, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A picture being high resolution is not a valid reason for deletion.--Rockfang (talk) 08:21, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This image isn't high resolution. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 09:05, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as it has now been downsized. Stifle (talk) 12:09, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, when an image is too large, tag it with {{Non-free reduce}}, not {{ffd}}. Nothing wrong with this image now. Nyttend (talk) 15:32, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Spike and tyke.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

no FUR, high resolution Vssun (talk) 07:25, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Long s.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep and Move to File:Text with long s.svg. PhilKnight (talk) 13:11, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned image, and blocks a (more-useful) image from the commons. If you oppose deletion, please consider whether you would support moving to another name. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 11:38, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, could work well in the introduction to Long s to show basically (its letters are much easier to read than the Milton image down below) how English used the character. Perhaps rename to "File:Text with long s.svg"?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pipasdasas.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by PhilKnight (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:08, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

this photo is an orphan. we now have a better, high-res, color image of this man (File:Philip Owen.jpg). I'm suspicious that this is actually self-made, and I don't think it's worth taking the risk considering we have a better photo anyways. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:12, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sabskuantan6.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep. PhilKnight (talk) 13:01, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:20, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, could reasonably be moved to Commons to depict a range of plants grown in Malaysia. Nyttend (talk) 15:34, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Cranbrook School Quadrangle.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Peripitus (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:12, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, Use not stated. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 19:27, 20 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Blatantly not low quality.--Rockfang (talk) 08:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, take it easy, no need to get angry. Low Resolution is an opinion, nothing more. I classify anything lower than 2000x2000 pixels as low resolution; a bit high perhaps, but the recall that the file was not nominated on the basis of being low quality alone. Note to closing Admin: If you feel that the file is not low resolution, then feel free to overlook that deletion reason. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 00:13, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not angry, and I said nothing about low resolution. You didn't even mention low resolution. You typed low quality. To me, low quality means blurry, out of focus, picture not centered on the "subject", etc. If you mean low resolution, you should probably say that in the future. That being said, you may want to do a bit more research when nominating files for deletion. The photo's page states what it is a picture of. The file is no longer orphaned. It took me all of maybe 10 seconds to find that page.--Rockfang (talk) 00:28, 23 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.