Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 December 31

< December 30	January 1 >

December 31

File:Wcmconfedflag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, possibly non-free. Kelly ^hi! 04:27, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tennessee-vote.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:04, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, obsoleted by File:Tennessee-vote.svg Kelly ^hi! 04:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. But some users may prefer PNG over SVG. Reh man 15:23, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MagnifyingGlass.svg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted as F2, as the image is quite clearly corrupted. SchuminWeb (Talk) 00:57, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot see this file... Corrupted? Phearson (talk) 05:21, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

It is not corrupted. in Firefox you can see it properly here: [1]. SVG support is not included or even complete in every browser... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Epgui (talk • contribs) 19:39, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't see it in Chrome and have no problem with most SVGs. Orpaned anyway, delete. Kelly ^hi! 20:56, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I can't see with Firefox too. Unused, so delete, per Kelly. Reh man 15:25, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phtalic anhydride.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:Phthalic anhydride-2D-Skeletal.png Kelly ^hi! 05:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Workphoto.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, UE, subject not identified Skier Dude (talk 06:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Maurice Leblanc (Writer).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy deleted as F4, as this image contains no source information, and it has been given twice the normal grace period that deletable image would offer to get these things cleaned up. SchuminWeb (Talk) 01:00, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

no source, author, or evidence of permission since 2005, subject died 1941 Hekerui (talk) 22:16, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's the only picture we have of him, is that a FUR? It's small enough to stand as fair use without change. Inductiveload (talk) 06:19, 25 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Is it the only pic of him that exists? That would be perfect for a FUR. If not, since he was born 1864 one chould presumably find an image published before 1923, which would be free in the U.S. and for use on this wiki. Hekerui (talk) 18:28, 28 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gretnablue production logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal/vanity image - no other encyc value Skier Dude (talk 06:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per nom. Reh man 15:28, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hi res STORM logo2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned personal logo - no other encyc value Skier Dude (talk 06:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hi res STORM logo.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned personal logo - no other encyc value Skier Dude (talk 06:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samson.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: speedy delete as F8. This file is on Commons and also nominated for deletion there, and editors are encouraged to participate in that deletion discussion to determine this file's fate. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:15, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No author, date of creation, or any other way to verify copyright. Kelly ^hi! 06:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - Some of the info here might be relevant.--Rockfang (talk) 08:51, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:International Design Studio logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

OR, corporate text logo - no further encyc need for it Skier Dude (talk 06:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:L07ChLeo3's user page logo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:05, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

orphaned talk page banner, no further use for image Skier Dude (talk 06:50, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carbachol.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:Carbachol.svg Kelly ^hi! 07:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Hyoscyamine.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:Hyoscyamine.svg Kelly ^hi! 07:07, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Blg1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 08:15, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Decant01.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unidentified subject. Kelly ^hi! 08:17, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GBA1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by SchuminWeb (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:10, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, unidentified subject (particularly author and date of sculpture or photo). Kelly ^hi! 08:40, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete. Old, useless, upload anyway. Per Honor et Gloria ✍ 08:47, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:HTC Trophy.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

These images fail fair use as they are easily replaceable, since the phones are commercially available, a free image that shows the phones can easily be obtained, either by someone that owns one of these phones or by any person that can go into a retail store and take a photo of the device for sale. Please also note that the images also have a false purpose of use reason listed: "To convey a visual concept of the new GUI in Windows Phone 7", the images are not used used in the Windows Phone 7 article but rather in the HTC 7 Trophy and Dell Venue Pro articles to show the phones. The excact same images were already deleted for this reason once and were again re-uploaded by the same user.Chris Ssk _talk 15:13, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- There images are NOT easily replaceable. I have looked through Flickr and many other sources and have yet to found a replacement image under creative commons license. Illegal Operation (talk) 16:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - - - I fully understand that it's nice to write an article and take an image from somewhere else. However, the phone is for sale so someone who owns one can take a photo. Easily replaceable does not equal Flickr. Otherwise, the rules would say that fair use is any photo that is not on Flickr. The rules don't say this. With Wikipedia, we don't have to have the latest in images. Really good writing can be done which can beat anything off the internet. Hakkapeliitta (talk) 01:31, 6 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I have previously ask Chris Ssk to find free image replacements and he has failed to do so, proving that these images are NOT easily replaceable. Illegal Operation (talk) 16:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That you or Chris Ssk can't find a replacement under an appropriate licence on Flickr or elsewhere doesn't mean the image isn't easily replaceable. We can't use unfree images when we can't find an appropriate freely licensed image on the internet when it would be quite possible for a Wikipedia editor to go out an take an appropriate photograph. Adambro (talk) 19:53, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Both: I agree with the nom. There is a clear distinction between article about thee phone and an article about the O.S. All anyone has to do is walk into a store, or find someone with one of these phones, and take a picture of one. (Note that if it is turned on and the screen is visible it would fall under {{derivative}} and most likely be sent here again for the same type of reason). Just for those who might disagree this is the same concept of not allowing, say, a cover of a Madonna Single in the info-box of the Madonna (entertainer) article to illustrate the person. Think of the HTC 7 Trophy and Dell Venue Pro articles as articles on the "person". Soundvisions1 (talk) 16:52, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:AntwerpenDistricten.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:AntwerpDistricts.png Kelly ^hi! 18:46, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Usa-green-timezone.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, obsoleted by File:US-Timezones.svg Kelly ^hi! 19:04, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Pearl Harbor path.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Magog the Ogre (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 21:12, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, redundant to File:PearlHarborCarrierChart.jpg Kelly ^hi! 19:08, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Does not appear to be a direct duplicate - the file on commons appears to be a derivative of this one, containing additional information (which according to the caption seems to have been added by the uploader on commons).Nigel Ish (talk) 19:45, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - Moved to Commons as File:Map of Pearl Harbor attack force.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 19:29, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Than4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan, no description. Kelly ^hi! 19:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Also File:Than5.jpg and File:Than7.jpg. Kelly ^hi! 19:39, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Goremykin.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image has no source/authorship information needed for transwiki. Commons has other images of this person with better provenance.[2] Kelly ^hi! 19:52, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NewEnglandHwy.shield.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned highway sign, I can't find any article that corresponds with this image. Kelly ^hi! 20:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Titenkov.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:02, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This seems like an unused userpage image. MGA73 (talk) 20:41, 31 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.