Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 August 5

< August 4	August 6 >

August 5

File:Image-Unicorn-petroglyph-2.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this image is dependent on the deleted article Petro photoglyph per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph. ww2censor (talk) 01:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and all the other related images. It's worth noting, given the AfD discussion, that there is no way on Earth that an article that required these images would ever survive on wikipedia - they will forever be orphaned. andy (talk) 08:52, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete and all the other related images, per andy. Links to these image files have been used to spam internet discussion forums with. - LuckyLouie (talk) 01:07, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unicorn-petroglyph-positive.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this image is dependent on the deleted article Petro photoglyph per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph. ww2censor (talk) 01:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unicorn-petroglyph-negative-1.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this orphaned image is dependent on the deleted article Petro photoglyph per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph. ww2censor (talk) 01:37, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unicorn-petroglyph-negative-2.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this orphaned image is dependent on the deleted article Petro photoglyph per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph. ww2censor (talk) 01:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unicorn-petroglyph-negative-3.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this image is dependent on the deleted article Petro photoglyph per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph. ww2censor (talk) 01:38, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unicorn-petroglyph-negative-4.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this image is dependent on the deleted article Petro photoglyph per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph. ww2censor (talk) 01:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Unicorn-petroglyph-negative-5.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: this orphaned image is dependent on the deleted article Petro photoglyph per Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Petro photoglyph. ww2censor (talk) 01:39, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lsol-hol.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair-use; article was redirected. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MarineMichaelBrown.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free image being used to show what a living person looks like. I can't find the discussion that allowed it to survive speedy deletion. There is nothing in the image that would not allow it to be replaced by another image of this person, nor is the photo itself of historical significance. Jay32183 (talk) 07:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is the only photo that I know of of this person, so it seems to me to pass the fair use test. Cla68 (talk) 07:21, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  - No, it doesn't. He's a living person so a photo can be created. We don't have to wait for the creation of a free photo. The fact that one can exist is enough to not allow a non-free one. For a non-free photo to be irreplaceable, no free photo can be found or created. Jay32183 (talk) 05:20, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a violation of WP:NFCC #1. This is a photo of a living person, and as such, a free alternative could be created.--Rockfang (talk) 07:42, 10 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This should be nominated for speedy deletion since it depicts a living person and thus has plausible replacability voiding the fair use rationale and putting it in violation of copyright law Solid State Survivor (talk) 08:19, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The only reason I didn't put it for speedy is that the image is marked as already having survived a speedy. I could not find the discussion that allowed that to happen. Bringing it here avoids edit warring. But it would be Wikipedia policy, not copyright law. I don't believe US copyright law makes any mention of being replaceable. Jay32183 (talk) 07:31, 12 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Physostigmine.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural Nomination from declined speedy deletion request. Reason given for deletion was "Incorrect/incomplete structure: stereochemistry; replaced by File:Physostigmine structure.png" -FASTILY ^(TALK) 09:06, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There are several correct version on Commons: File:Physostigmine Structural Formulae.png, File:Physostigmine structure.png, File:Physostigmine.svg (ShadowsCommons). For this reason, the above mentioned incorrect images can safely be deleted. --Leyo 09:29, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rowhani.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 22:09, 9 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Insufficient source; image claims to be from kremlin.ru but is not actually linked to where it can be found on that site. (ESkog)^(Talk) 13:40, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Have you checked the OTRS ticket? --Leyo 14:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it's the generic release for all materials from the Kremlin site, and doesn't speak specifically to any image. (ESkog)^(Talk) 19:03, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't find it, either. --Leyo 19:49, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MJHistoryLive.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC#8 - decorative image that does not add to the reader's understanding of the subject. It's a simple video screenshot and the image itself is not discussed. Mosmof (talk) 13:50, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Deletion is not a copyvio? Tbhotch^Talk ^C. 00:26, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The CC tag would technically make it copyvio, but since the uploader create a non-free content rationale, I'm assuming the intent was for the image to be fair use, rather than free license. --Mosmof (talk) 00:35, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The picture should not be deleted. The text talks about the HIStory World Tour, and this picture shows what the performance was like. This is the only picture that shows him performing at one of his official world tours on the whole wikipedia page of Michael Jackson.. Michael Jackson was a singer AND a dancer, and the HIStory World Tour is amongst his highest grossing and most popular world tours. For that reason I think the picture should be kept. Sinexcite (talk) 03:06, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- That's demonstrably untrue. --Mosmof (talk) 12:40, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
This should be nominated for speedy deletion on grounds that it is copyrighted and other free-use images of the singer are currently available and in use. The fair use rationale is entirely contingent on the fact that no free-use image of the subject can plausibly be found. This article about Michael Jackson already has several fair-use images on that subject, and adding copyrighted images to show the subject at a preferred time or participating in a preferred activity does not illustrate a distinct subject, so we can see the replacability element of this fair use rationale is incorrect in its assertion. Solid State Survivor (talk) 08:15, 11 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Navyugsenaflag.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use, likely copyright violation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 18:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:NavyugSenaLogo.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, Unencyclopedic, no foreseeable use, likely copyright violation. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 18:42, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Per Fastily. --Leyo 19:51, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oxwabelectionresults.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:02, 13 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obsolete. Replaced by File:OxfordWestGraph.png. I am the uploader. New Progressive (talk) 00:01, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.