Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2010 April 14

< April 13	April 15 >

April 14

File:Obsession nudimension.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Content of song not discussed in article. WP:NFC. This is (hopefully) a prompt to get some sourced commentary in the article. Dawnseeker2000 00:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Touch My Body.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the file does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. — ξ ^xplicit 03:04, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Klanthon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned file, no encyclopedic context given. — ξ ^xplicit 05:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FNM Angel Dust - sampler.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. This image is not significantly different from the main cover to justify its use. — ξ ^xplicit 05:46, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:FNM - Free Concert in the Park.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 05:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#3 as multiple non-free files are being used when one would suffice. Additionally, this is not an album cover, so {{Non-free album cover}} is improperly used here. — ξ ^xplicit 05:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rascal Flatts - Fast Cars and Freedom.ogg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: No Consensus; solution offered. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 04:06, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fails WP:NFCC#8 as the file does not add significantly to readers' understanding of the article and its omission would not be detrimental to that understanding. — ξ ^xplicit 06:05, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
With all due respect, you have got to be kidding. Having a sample of the song in the song's article doesn't add anything to the article?--Esprit15d • talk • contribs 14:06, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I would agree with Espirit15d here. I must say that all songs are unique in some respect and samples are of good use to the encyclopedia as they do what text can not. The Touch My Body article does contain sourced commentary and that is a far more clear bare minimum threshold for inclusion. I fall on the side of the "inclusionists" here. Dawnseeker2000 02:03, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Aside from the lyrics—of which an excerpt exists in the article—this audio sample fails to add understanding to the reader. — ξ ^xplicit 01:08, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
You could make the "fails WP:NFCC#8" argument for each and every picture and audio sample we have. It's not a good basis for requesting deletion. I think the concept of using the method for deletion is rubbish because it boils down to opinion - everyone has one. I prefer to use something more concrete. Dawnseeker2000 01:25, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this results in a keep I will replace the sample with one that does not contain the imperfections that this one does. Dawnseeker2000 03:51, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:120106c.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Angusmclellan (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 12:06, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Without a description, the photo is useless. Not in use, and, from what I can tell, there are no discernable features on the building that could hint at the location. Blurpeace 06:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Location is 450 Roberts Road, Subiaco (confirmed using Google streetview), when it was approaching completion. It's the new broadcast centre for 92.9 (Perth radio station), which has been the main focus of the uploader's contributions. There's an alternate image at File:051206d.JPG, currently being used on the article Mix 94.5. In my view this image shows the building better, although there is more fencing than in the other. Both could use more informative file names. Jheald (talk) 13:49, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Google Maps location: [1]. Blurpeace 20:27, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please close this discussion under CSD F8. I have transferred the photos to Wikimedia Commons and have categorized them properly. Blurpeace 21:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tartu lipp sm.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Zscout370 (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The color is wrong and an SVG version exists File:Tartu flag.svg. Quibik (talk) 06:48, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tamta-madvma2007.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader is known to claim non-free content as own work, see Commons:Deletion requests/2009/09#Files uploaded by Egtheod on en.wikipedia. Uploader claims own work here but EXIF doesn't contain camera data and apparent camera position make it seem unlikely that this could be taken from the crowd. Under other circumstances we could assume that this claim is true, but perhaps not here. Angus McLellan (Talk) 10:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MUGSHOT!!.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Fastily (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 06:03, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, Low Quality, no foreseeable use. FASTILY_sock^(TALK) 11:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Kings Norton Royal British Legion Youth Marching Band. The article contains a photo of the band standing by a bus; this one shows them in action. Both could be moved to Commons. (And given more informative file names). Jheald (talk) 13:52, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Piratenpartij Nederland logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This logo was incorrectly used as the logo of the Pirate Party of the Netherlands. It has been replaced by File:Piratpartiet.svg which was already on Wikimedia.org. Lord Alderaan (talk) 11:57, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Facebook Abuse.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Keep; solution offered. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:44, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that this image fails NFCC1 and NFCC8. There does not appear to be any significant discussion of this image or the message contained therein on the page which uses it, Criticism of Facebook. Therefore, it has no Contextual Significance (criterion 8). Since having it does not increase the reader's understanding of the subject, it also fails criterion 1 in that there is a free replacement which would convey the same value, i.e. nothing. The Wordsmith^Communicate 17:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It's simple text, so doesn't qualify for copyright as an image under U.S. law. Suggest retagging as {{PD-ineligible}}. Not sure whether it belongs in the article, or perhaps in another article; but that would be a question for the article talk page. Jheald (talk) 14:02, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Estonian Police and Border Guard Board coat of arms.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 02:01, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The colors are wrong, superseded by File:Estonian Police and Border Guard Board coat of arms.svg. Quibik (talk) 18:17, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Praga1968MolotovCoctail.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NFCC #1 and #8. Photo shows people throwing Molotov cocktails, which is not necessary to understand the concept. There are no supporting references to indicate that the photo itself is of any importance. howcheng {chat} 19:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, really not adding anything. J Milburn (talk) 19:43, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Because hiding the violence that happened through text is how we do. Let's just delete this because it's 'not relevant' get out of your wikipedia state of mind, people- and learn to understand. 69.248.190.35 (talk) 20:54, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Rude pravo.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all clear what this particular image is adding to either article- by all means, talk about the publication, but this random non-free image is not required. Additionally, due to the age of the publication, there will be PD images available. J Milburn (talk) 19:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Beriozka-gastronom.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Images adds nothing to the articles. We do not need an image of a man getting into a car to understand that people could purchase goods using foreign currency... J Milburn (talk) 19:47, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:12 apostals Hole.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Low resolution image of a mural that hasn't been described. No encyclopedic value (and possible freedom of panorama concerns without source country information). Blurpeace 21:27, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:120px-Northeast.svg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use, obsolete to File:Arrow northeast.svg. Blurpeace 22:06, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:120px-Northwest.svg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use; obsolete to File:Arrow northwest.svg. Blurpeace 22:07, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:120px-Southeast.svg.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No longer in use; obsolete to File:Arrow southeast.svg. Blurpeace 22:08, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:120px-Wappen Bockfliess.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Practical duplicate of File:AUT Bockfließ COA.jpg located on Wikimedia Commons; no longer in use. Blurpeace 22:21, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Formula 1 for MCD.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Image is currently a black square; formula can be done through wiki code. Blurpeace 23:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Talent Show.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:50, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Federal Center SW.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons commons:Category:Federal Center SW (Washington Metro) Jheald (talk) 14:13, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? The image quality's horrible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. No real valid to retain. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RhodeIslandMetro.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:52, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons. commons:Category:Rhode Island Avenue – Brentwood (Washington Metro) Jheald (talk) 14:10, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? The image quality's horrible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. No real valid to retain. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Potomac Avenue Metro.JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 14:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? The image quality's horrible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. No real valid to retain. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:L'enfant Plaza (Lower Level).JPG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned, low quality. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:53, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 14:16, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? The image quality's horrible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. No real valid to retain. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Newyorkavenuefloridaavenuegalladetuniv.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:10, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 23:56, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Commons Jheald (talk) 14:17, 16 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why? The image quality's horrible. SchuminWeb (Talk) 21:30, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per nom. No real valid to retain. -FASTILY ^(TALK) 03:45, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.