Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 15
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
September 15
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete as copyright violation of sign Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:32, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Russian-church-haroldsx.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hohenloh (notify | contribs).
- This photograph depicts a noticeboard which, due to the calligraphic work displayed, could be considered copyrighted. The image is unused, so no fair use claim can be made of it. Freedom of panorama applies only to 3D works.
On an entirely separate point, I'm not sure what the picture of the noticeboard was created and uploaded for, but I live within a reasonable distance of this church and can probably take a replacement non-infringing picture if desired. Stifle (talk) 10:13, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]- I took the photograph of the notice-board, as explained (I did not do the writing). To claim that one is not allowed to take a photo of a notice-board because the style of writing on it could possibly be copyright I find frankly absurd. I have no doubt that there are many images of a similar nature on Wikipedia. I plan to use this image for two articles I am working on, but held off due to this threat of deletion, as I didn't want to place it in an article only to have it deleted. If it is deleted I will replace it. Hohenloh + 14:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Whether you find it absurd or not is, with respect, not relevant. If your argument held, then I could take pictures of the pages of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows one at a time and publish them myself. Finally, WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not considered a strong argument. Stifle (talk) 16:21, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I took the photograph of the notice-board, as explained (I did not do the writing). To claim that one is not allowed to take a photo of a notice-board because the style of writing on it could possibly be copyright I find frankly absurd. I have no doubt that there are many images of a similar nature on Wikipedia. I plan to use this image for two articles I am working on, but held off due to this threat of deletion, as I didn't want to place it in an article only to have it deleted. If it is deleted I will replace it. Hohenloh + 14:07, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Kagami.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by La Alquimista (notify | contribs).
- Derivative work of a copyrighted work (Kagami Hiiragi). Hekerui (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Winry Rockbell.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by La Alquimista (notify | contribs).
- Derivative work of a copyrighted work (Winry Rockbell). Hekerui (talk) 17:44, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Musicalnotes India.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Quality check (notify | contribs).
- So small that it's useless, likely a saved png version of the supreme File:India-music.svg. Hekerui (talk) 18:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:FOX ES Screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Lulzyboy (notify | contribs).
- Screenshot of Family Guy which adds nothing to the reader's understanding of FOX Espana, the only page on which it is used. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:28, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:MTV Adria Screenshot.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by GlassCobra (notify | contribs).
- Screenshot of a music video which adds nothing to the MTV Adria article on which it is used. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:30, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Screenshot of MTV Lithuania in 2007.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Saulius0206 (notify | contribs).
- Screenshot of a music video that doesn't add understanding to the MTV Lithuania & Latvia article on which it is used. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:32, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Composite image featuring 21 non-free images. Adds little to the article, an image of the pets/their evolution is not required. J Milburn (talk) 19:49, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: delete Graeme Bartlett (talk) 13:33, 2 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Asterix and the Goths.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nefirious (notify | contribs).
- Fails NFCC#8 the given purpose is "To make the article more colorful" which isn't adding significantly to readers understanding. 82.7.40.7 (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:03, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In it the form used clearly fails NFCC#1 any cartoon sketch would perform the same purpose. 82.7.40.7 (talk) 20:33, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.