Jump to content

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 September 11

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

< Wikipedia:Files for deletion

< September 10	September 12 >

September 11

File:StatesRecord.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:StatesRecord.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Infrogmation (notify | contribs).

Orphaned file, been replaced with higher quality File:StatesRecords147.jpg. εω (talk) 01:01, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it is blurry, the only valuable bit here was the copyright notice, now moved to replacement. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as "obsolete" reason for deletion, per user Graeme Barlet above me. Martin Raybourne (talk) 21:45, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map of Virginia highlighting BWI Metro Area.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of Virginia highlighting BWI Metro Area.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WhisperToMe (notify | contribs).

OR, no source, no author info. εω (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete orphaned image of questionable utility, given that sources are not present to confirm; lack of information to prove that it is the author's work ~~(given its small size, it's possible it was copied somewhere.)~~ Actually its very close to similar images on Wikipedia, but the other isses still stand. Martin Raybourne (talk) 21:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map of WVA highlighting BWI metro area.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map of WVA highlighting BWI metro area.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by WhisperToMe (notify | contribs).

OR no source, no author info. εω (talk) 01:02, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
comment almost certainly a derivative of File:Map of West Virginia highlighting Berkeley County.svg or File:Map of West Virginia highlighting Jefferson County.svg or its equivalent. There would be no copyright beyond public domain as that is what it's parent map has been released as, and there is very little creativity added. However it could be deleted due to being unused. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:47, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tetouan 3en.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tetouan 3en.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Flyingbird (notify | contribs).

WP:NOT your file server. Orphaned. εω (talk) 01:03, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no value due to crops and explanatory text; image description page shows it was used in a purpose not keeping with WP:NOT. Martin Raybourne (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Chersonissos 3en.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chersonissos 3en.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Flyingbird (notify | contribs).

WP:NOT your file server. Orphaned. εω (talk) 01:05, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no value due to crops and explanatory text; image description page shows it was used in a purpose not keeping with WP:NOT. Martin Raybourne (talk) 21:50, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Clockcock.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Clockcock.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Archivist (notify | contribs).

Orphaned diagram. εω (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; diagram does little to offer an explanation as to how the clock assembly works. Cheers, I'^mperator 00:08, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ttfuzz 3.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ttfuzz 3.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Boffy b (notify | contribs).

OR no source, no author. εω (talk) 01:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above, and the fact it is an orphan. "something to do with fuzzy something" doesn't exactly give confidence either...Cheers, I'^mperator 20:50, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Oracle hq high.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Oracle hq high.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dori (notify | contribs).

OR no source no author, original file name has been deleted as well. εω (talk) 01:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Scottmonument-v2-small.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scottmonument-v2-small.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Snoyes (notify | contribs).

Thumbnail for File:Scottmonument-v2-big.jpg, OR. εω (talk) 01:09, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as a redundant and, consequently, orphaned image. If you really want the image to be smaller, just change the pixel number. Cheers, I'^mperator 20:53, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Map Ahrensburg in Germany.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Map Ahrensburg in Germany.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ly (notify | contribs).

no source, no author, orphaned. εω (talk) 01:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Fukuoka-momochi.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fukuoka-momochi.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tlotoxl (notify | contribs).

No source, no author, orphaned. εω (talk) 01:10, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Washmems.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Washmems.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by AlexPlank (notify | contribs).

Low res, orphaned, no author, no source. εω (talk) 01:14, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom; authorless, orphaned, low res, and, in addition, does a terrible job at portraying its subject (the Bunker Hill Memorial, if I'm not mistaken). If the uploader did create it, then he needs to get better res and a better shot; if not, then it violates copyright policy (by not giving credit to the author and the appropriate taggings) Cheers, I'^mperator 22:15, 17 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jim Hawkins publicity.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jim Hawkins publicity.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Ohms law (notify | contribs).

Fails fair use / living person. Also, fully copyrighted, and unlicensed for free use. NonvocalScream (talk) 05:20, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
delete Clear failure of fair use guideline for living people given that consensus is that the presumption is that we can get photos of such individuals and is thus easily replaceable. JoshuaZ (talk) 14:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Blatant delete not tagged as non-free, but clearly is. Orphaned, no rationale, replaceable...lots of ways this fails. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Oh wow, I didn't even realize it wasn't tagged as non-free. I glanced through and sort of assumed it at least had that right. JoshuaZ (talk) 15:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CR447.gif

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:CR447.gif (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Coolrocketdude3444 (notify | contribs).

Obsolete. Replaced by image:Washoe County Route 447 NV.svg, an improved version uploaded at Commons. --LJ (talk) 06:04, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Redundant image, obviously replaceable by Image:Washoe County Route 447 NV.svg. No reason to keep. Cheers, I'^mperator 00:42, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Deleting okay by me. -Kluft (talk) 03:28, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vineethmenon.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vineethmenon.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Fretfreak (notify | contribs).

Orphaned picture of a person whose article was deleted. Lacks educational purpose. Hekerui (talk) 08:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no reason to keep a useless image. Nyttend (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete long gone editor, no encyclopedic value. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Honoluluflag.PNG

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Honoluluflag.PNG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gerald Farinas (notify | contribs).

Obsolete, replaced by File:Flag of Honolulu, Hawaii.svg, an improved version uploaded at Commons. Hekerui (talk) 08:45, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, useless given the presence of the .svg from Commons. Nyttend (talk) 23:38, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete redundant image. Cheers, I'^mperator 20:54, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Techno Rose of Blighty (alternate cover).jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Techno Rose of Blighty (alternate cover).jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Hellbus (notify | contribs).

The alternate release is not mentioned, and there's nothing close to discussion of the covers. This image is not required and adds nothing. J Milburn (talk) 10:06, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:K.v.mathew.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:K.v.mathew.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Grbpradeep (notify | contribs).

Clearly posed, possibly a work for hire. "Rights with the author" doesn't really illuminate the situation. I doubt the uploader owns the rights to this work. J Milburn (talk) 12:37, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, no real evidence of permission. Note that this image is taken from a scanner, not from a camera. Nyttend (talk) 13:19, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete obviously scanned from some source, and no evidence the uploader has rights to release. Living person, replaceable. Zap. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Wwcsign.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wwcsign.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Chris4682 (notify | contribs).

Nonfree photo of a historical marker in a publicly-accessible location. The fair use rationale is correct in saying "At this time there is no known equivalent photograph available for use. No known page editors have a suitable replacement". However, this should be treated like a nonfree image of a living person: there's no reason that a Wikimedia editor couldn't photograph the marker and release it freely. "Replaceable" means "able to be replaced with a nonfree image", not "able to be replaced by an already-available nonfree image". Nyttend (talk) 13:18, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as blatantly replaceable non-free content. Any editor with a camera can replace it. I've removed it from the article it was in, as this is a seriously blatant abuse. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:24, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure this is replaceable with free content. The text on the sign would be copyrighted by the Indiana Historical Bureau. Unless they were to release it under a free license, then it's still a non-free image. I suspect the only NFCC that applies is 8, and I have no strong opinion as to if it qualifies. — PyTom (talk) 15:17, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
'delete unacceptable and unfair use. Since it is a photo of text, this could be described in text. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:53, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PODS logo.png

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: keep Skier Dude (talk) 03:58, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PODS logo.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by SpaceFlight89 (notify | contribs).

NFCC#8Non-free content which is used only to decorate its presence does not significantly increase readers' understanding of the topic 86.139.142.44 (talk) 17:58, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Including a logo helps users identify the company, omitting it make it harder for them to do so. Keep, as this easily passes WP:NFCC#8. — PyTom (talk) 18:32, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep we accept logos of companies on the articles about the companies. --Hammersoft (talk) 18:34, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it is covered by fair use, identifying the company. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 20:07, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep easily falls within fair use criteria, for identifying the company, it is very likely that the copyright holder requested its presence at WP:IFU.
Keep per above; company logos are generally allowed by Wikipedia. A note to the nominator: NFCC redirects to Pakistan National Football Challenge Cup; you need to put a "WP:" in front of it (i.e WP:NFCC). Cheers, I'^mperator 00:43, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, it is standard practice for one company logo to be permitted on the article about the company; I see no reason why this should be excepted. Stifle (talk) 08:15, 14 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nshsinfosmall.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nshsinfosmall.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Gibbsman (notify | contribs).

Image improperly licensed as US Gov. It is from the State of Utah "Copyright © 2009 State of Utah Office of Education" and per 4. COPYRIGHT LIMITATIONS is only usable for "personal or informational use only." εω (talk) 19:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with passion too many people confuse state/local governments with the federal level in the U.S. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly not PD-USGov, and there's no way that it passes nonfree criteria. Nyttend (talk) 23:36, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bhsinformation.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Stifle (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT ⚡ 13:05, 19 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bhsinformation.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Alpha.three (notify | contribs).

Image is not PD-USGov, its personal-use only from Utah gov. Http://www.utah.gov/disclaimer.html Admrboltz (talk) 19:50, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete with passion too many people confuse state/local governments with the federal level in the U.S. --Hammersoft (talk) 20:08, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, clearly not PD-USGov, and doesn't qualify for fair use. Nyttend (talk) 23:35, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Files_for_deletion/2009_September_11&oldid=1075401890"