Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 26
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < October 25 | October 27 > |
|---|
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Kmccoy (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 05:01, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rothkamm signature.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Rothkamm (notify | contribs).
- You can't create a logo for your user name and then claim protection by copyright. ZooFari 00:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Tagged for speedy deletion under CSD F5--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 07:48, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:03, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Becky 1938 film.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Blakegripling ph (notify | contribs).
- I'll have it deleted since a theatrical poster of the film is available. Blake Gripling (talk) 00:51, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Explicit (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 03:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Swaran Manjusa.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anoop8725 (notify | contribs).
- Photo of a book cover, claimed to still be copyrighted, being used in the article on the author. If indeed the image is copyrighted then we can't use it here. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:12, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I agree as per ESkog a fair use claime for a image of the book used on a article about the author is invalid.its only valid if the article is about the book itself.--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 08:00, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Rettetast (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 22:12, 5 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Shiv Pujan Sahay Smriti.JPG (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anoop8725 (notify | contribs).
- No reason for a second nonfree image to decorate this biography; we already have an image in the infobox. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:14, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep No it doesn't the infobox image was deleted File:Shivpujan Sahay.JPG see deletion log .
- Fair enough. However, the guy died in 1963. It seems like we're stretching things to force a non-free image into this article when many photos of him during his life would be out of copyright. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But there are no images free or otherwise i can find, the moment we find a replacement i have no objection we delete this, but until then ... --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The image which was deleted was deleted for missing a source - it only said that it was "scanned from a story book". If only we could get that user to tell us what the publication date is on that "story book" - and a little more about the source - we'd be in business. Until then, though, I agree with you. (ESkog)(Talk) 18:33, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment But there are no images free or otherwise i can find, the moment we find a replacement i have no objection we delete this, but until then ... --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:26, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Fair enough. However, the guy died in 1963. It seems like we're stretching things to force a non-free image into this article when many photos of him during his life would be out of copyright. (ESkog)(Talk) 13:51, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Unless I am missing something we have an image sourced to a blog, with no information as to the copyright holder and where the article's subject is such a small portion of the image as to be almost useless. Clearly from the photo there are better images out there (basically the one that Devanand Konwar is looking at) and it is possible they are out of copyright. - Peripitus (Talk) 11:41, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- No need for a second non-free image to identify the same person; there's already an image in the infobox. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:19, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Rahul Sankrityayan.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Anoop8725 (notify | contribs).
- Excessive non-free images used to identify subject of article. Infobox already has one. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 04:02, 3 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Excessive non-free images used to identify subject of article. Infobox already has one. (ESkog)(Talk) 21:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.