Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2009 October 21
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| < October 20 | October 22 > |
|---|
October 21
[edit]
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Cutsock.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Samloveridge (notify | contribs).
- OR, UE Skier Dude (talk) 04:04, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
.png){kind=link}
- File:Surf(Browser).png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by CalvinMorrison (notify | contribs).
.png&action=delete&wpReason=%5B%5BWikipedia%3AFiles+for+deletion%2F2009+October+21%23File%3ASurf%28Browser%29.png%5D%5D){kind=link}
.png&action=history){kind=link}
- Orphaned file, target article non-existent. — ξxplicit 05:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Kept, I also uploaded a rotated version. --Sherool (talk) 21:49, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Battle of Stony Creek Monument, Stony Creek.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Nelro (notify | contribs).
- OR, bad rotation Skier Dude (talk) 05:25, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong keep - the rotation is easy to fix. It will fit nicely in Battle of Stony Creek, which contains an image far lower in quality than this one. ZooFari 00:05, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OR, wording (yellow) is illegible Skier Dude (talk) 05:34, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm not sure what OR means but I'm happy for it to be deleted. There's a better map being used on the Blacktown page. This map is unlikely to be used on Wikipedia. Crico (talk) 05:10, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Self-made; not unless the uploader is a satellite or an astronaut, so likely a copyvio but without a source we have no way of knowing the copyright status and it easily replaceable by File:BlacktownMap.jpg. ww2censor (talk) 05:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Speedily deleted. TNXMan 00:09, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Azole structures.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Cybercobra (notify | contribs).
- Superceded by superior PNG version which links to the Citizendium original, so no attribution issues. Cybercobra (talk) 07:23, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete You're the uploader, so it may be deleted at your request. ZooFari 22:39, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tagged for Speedy Deletion as redundant; I hadn't checked the CSD for files when I filed the FfD. --Cybercobra (talk) 21:50, 23 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned, low quality, unencyclopedic, use not stated. -FASTILY (TALK) 08:16, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Image uploaded as part of vandalism attack on the Stephen Watson article. It is probably of the vandal or one of the friends, and has nothing to do with Stephen Watson Greenman (talk) 15:03, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Skier Dude (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 07:04, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:JoelMchale.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Diegomgarcia (notify | contribs).
- Images are orphaned and Joel McHale's representative from Sonesta Entertainment, LLC claims the uploader is not the copyright holder as claimed. See my talk page. The second image is a cropped version of the first and is orphaned also. Nv8200p talk 16:51, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by MBisanz (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 02:01, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Borland Delphi 2006.png (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Dybdahl (notify | contribs).
- This image violates Wikipedia Non-Free Contents Criteria policy clause 3: Minimal extents of use, as there is already another file, designated File:Delphi 2009 Screenshot.jpg is serving the same purpose in the same Wikipedia article, Embarcadero Delphi. In addition, this file lacks a non-free use rationale. Fleet Command (talk) 19:08, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. The argument about NFCC #8 is persuasive. The image adds little that a text description could not. kmccoy (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WLEssentials.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Damaster98 (notify | contribs).
- This image fails to comply with Wikipedia Non-free Contents Criteria policy, clause 8: Contextual significance as it is used in Windows Live Essentials without aiding or even participating in a critical commentry of any kind. Fleet Command (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- This image is discussed in context within the article itself and the removal of this image will lead to significant reader confusion regarding the original Windows Live Essentials website with the current Windows Live Essentials application, as the two are vastly different products while confusingly branded with the same name. It is of utter importance to retain this image such that readers are not confused between the two products. --Damaster98 (talk) 01:02, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete. The argument about NFCC #8 is persuasive. The image adds little that a text description could not. kmccoy (talk) 19:26, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:Windows Live Dashboard.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Damaster98 (notify | contribs).
- This image fails to comply with Wikipedia Non-free Contents Criteria policy, clause 8: Contextual significance as it is used in Windows Live Essentials without aiding or even participating in a critical commentry of any kind. Fleet Command (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Please refer to the comments made regarding File:WLEssentials.jpg above. --Damaster98 (talk) 01:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WLInstaller Website.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Damaster98 (notify | contribs).
- This image fails to comply with Wikipedia Non-free Contents Criteria policy, clause 3: Minimal extent of usage as it is only used in Windows Live Essentials article, in which another image, designated File:Windows Live Essentials.PNG, serves the purpose of illustrating Windows Live Essentials website. As for being a historic product, it also fails Wikipedia Non-free Contents Criteria policy, clause 8: Contextual significance as it does not aid or even participate in a critical commentry of any kind which regards the history of Windows Live Essentials. Fleet Command (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: This image is now unused and meets the criterion F5 for speedy deletion. Fleet Command (talk) 16:48, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Drilnoth (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 19:09, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:WLInstaller Application.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Damaster98 (notify | contribs).
- This image fails to comply with Wikipedia Non-free Contents Criteria policy, clause 3: Minimal extent of usage as it is only used in Windows Live Essentials article, in which another image, designated File:Windows Live Essentials Installer.png, serves the purpose of illustrating Windows Live Essentials installer application. As for being a historic product, it also fails Wikipedia Non-free Contents Criteria policy, clause 8: Contextual significance as it does not aid or even participate in a critical commentry of any kind which regards the history of Windows Live Essentials. Fleet Command (talk) 19:35, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Update: This image is now unused and meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Fleet Command (talk) 16:45, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Orphaned file, not exactly the best quality. No foreseeable encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 21:59, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:33531796E.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Tmarino331 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 22:05, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:600kyleinmakeupsb2.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Kdc102 (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 22:06, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:H.Mills+M.Sinden.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Captainclegg (notify | contribs).
- Non-free image used in Heather Mills and Marc Sinden to show that they know each other. Not necessary at all for reader comprehension (WP:NFCC #8 violation). howcheng {chat} 22:27, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by Sherool (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT⚡ 00:01, 30 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- File:BFImage.jpg (delete | talk | history | logs) - uploaded by Action Hank (notify | contribs).
- Orphaned file, no encyclopedic use. — ξxplicit 23:40, 21 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Probably an image of the author (maybe to use in user space?). The editor only made less than 15 edits four years ago, so it might be fine to delete it. ZooFari 00:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.